Traditional Ecological Knowledge in Environmental Assessment and Management

It is now a policy requirement that "traditional ecological knowledge" (TEK) be incorporated into environmental assessment and resource management in the North. However, there is little common understanding about what TEK is, and no guidance on how to implement the policy in public arenas...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:ARCTIC
Main Author: Usher, Peter J.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: The Arctic Institute of North America 2000
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/arctic/article/view/63906
_version_ 1835009116528967680
author Usher, Peter J.
author_facet Usher, Peter J.
author_sort Usher, Peter J.
collection Unknown
container_issue 2
container_title ARCTIC
container_volume 53
description It is now a policy requirement that "traditional ecological knowledge" (TEK) be incorporated into environmental assessment and resource management in the North. However, there is little common understanding about what TEK is, and no guidance on how to implement the policy in public arenas where knowledge claims must be tested. The problems are inconsistent and unclear definitions of TEK, and insufficient attention to appropriate methods of organizing and presenting it for assessment and management purposes. TEK can be classified as knowledge about the environment, knowledge about the use of the environment, values about the environment, and the knowledge system itself. All categories are required for environmental assessment, but each must be presented and examined differently. TEK and "Western" science provide partially different information, based on different sets of observations and procedures, and sometimes on different knowledge claims. It is important that TEK be comprehensible and testable as a knowledge claim in public reviews, and usable for ongoing public monitoring and co-management processes. To this end, certain procedures are recommended for recording, organizing, and presenting TEK, with particular emphasis on the need to differentiate between observation and inference or association. Documenting TEK as recommended usually requires trained intermediaries, but they in turn require the support and cooperation of those who have TEK. One consequence is that it is often both impractical and inappropriate to require development proponents to incorporate TEK into their environmental impact statements. However, the environmental assessment process must facilitate the use of TEK in the public review phase. Les politiques publiques exigent maintenant que le «savoir écologique traditionnel» (SÉT) soit inclus dans les évaluations environnementales et la gestion des ressources du Nord. On ne s'accorde toutefois pas très bien sur la nature du SÉT et il n'existe pas de principes directeurs sur la façon ...
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
genre Arctic
genre_facet Arctic
geographic Canada
geographic_facet Canada
id ftunivcalgaryojs:oai:journalhosting.ucalgary.ca:article/63906
institution Open Polar
language English
op_collection_id ftunivcalgaryojs
op_relation https://journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/arctic/article/view/63906/47841
https://journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/arctic/article/view/63906
op_source ARCTIC; Vol. 53 No. 2 (2000): June: 101–212; 183-193
1923-1245
0004-0843
publishDate 2000
publisher The Arctic Institute of North America
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivcalgaryojs:oai:journalhosting.ucalgary.ca:article/63906 2025-06-15T14:14:53+00:00 Traditional Ecological Knowledge in Environmental Assessment and Management Usher, Peter J. 2000-01-01 application/pdf https://journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/arctic/article/view/63906 eng eng The Arctic Institute of North America https://journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/arctic/article/view/63906/47841 https://journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/arctic/article/view/63906 ARCTIC; Vol. 53 No. 2 (2000): June: 101–212; 183-193 1923-1245 0004-0843 traditional ecological knowledge environmental assessment co-management research methods public policy Canada savoir écologique traditionnel évaluation environnementale cogestion méthodes de recherche politique publique info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion research-article 2000 ftunivcalgaryojs 2025-05-27T03:29:43Z It is now a policy requirement that "traditional ecological knowledge" (TEK) be incorporated into environmental assessment and resource management in the North. However, there is little common understanding about what TEK is, and no guidance on how to implement the policy in public arenas where knowledge claims must be tested. The problems are inconsistent and unclear definitions of TEK, and insufficient attention to appropriate methods of organizing and presenting it for assessment and management purposes. TEK can be classified as knowledge about the environment, knowledge about the use of the environment, values about the environment, and the knowledge system itself. All categories are required for environmental assessment, but each must be presented and examined differently. TEK and "Western" science provide partially different information, based on different sets of observations and procedures, and sometimes on different knowledge claims. It is important that TEK be comprehensible and testable as a knowledge claim in public reviews, and usable for ongoing public monitoring and co-management processes. To this end, certain procedures are recommended for recording, organizing, and presenting TEK, with particular emphasis on the need to differentiate between observation and inference or association. Documenting TEK as recommended usually requires trained intermediaries, but they in turn require the support and cooperation of those who have TEK. One consequence is that it is often both impractical and inappropriate to require development proponents to incorporate TEK into their environmental impact statements. However, the environmental assessment process must facilitate the use of TEK in the public review phase. Les politiques publiques exigent maintenant que le «savoir écologique traditionnel» (SÉT) soit inclus dans les évaluations environnementales et la gestion des ressources du Nord. On ne s'accorde toutefois pas très bien sur la nature du SÉT et il n'existe pas de principes directeurs sur la façon ... Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Unknown Canada ARCTIC 53 2
spellingShingle traditional ecological knowledge
environmental assessment
co-management
research methods
public policy
Canada
savoir écologique traditionnel
évaluation environnementale
cogestion
méthodes de recherche
politique publique
Usher, Peter J.
Traditional Ecological Knowledge in Environmental Assessment and Management
title Traditional Ecological Knowledge in Environmental Assessment and Management
title_full Traditional Ecological Knowledge in Environmental Assessment and Management
title_fullStr Traditional Ecological Knowledge in Environmental Assessment and Management
title_full_unstemmed Traditional Ecological Knowledge in Environmental Assessment and Management
title_short Traditional Ecological Knowledge in Environmental Assessment and Management
title_sort traditional ecological knowledge in environmental assessment and management
topic traditional ecological knowledge
environmental assessment
co-management
research methods
public policy
Canada
savoir écologique traditionnel
évaluation environnementale
cogestion
méthodes de recherche
politique publique
topic_facet traditional ecological knowledge
environmental assessment
co-management
research methods
public policy
Canada
savoir écologique traditionnel
évaluation environnementale
cogestion
méthodes de recherche
politique publique
url https://journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/arctic/article/view/63906