Dissipation of Bromide and Metribuzin Affected by Tillage and Crop Residue Management in Subarctic Alaska

Prudent use of agricultural fertilizers and herbicides is paramount for sustaining or improving surface and ground water quality in Subarctic regions, but little information is available that documents the loss of chemicals from agricultural lands in the Subarctic. This study aimed to ascertain more...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:ARCTIC
Main Authors: Sharratt, Brenton S., Knight, Charles W.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: The Arctic Institute of North America 2010
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/arctic/article/view/63488
_version_ 1835009121329348608
author Sharratt, Brenton S.
Knight, Charles W.
author_facet Sharratt, Brenton S.
Knight, Charles W.
author_sort Sharratt, Brenton S.
collection Unknown
container_issue 3
container_title ARCTIC
container_volume 58
description Prudent use of agricultural fertilizers and herbicides is paramount for sustaining or improving surface and ground water quality in Subarctic regions, but little information is available that documents the loss of chemicals from agricultural lands in the Subarctic. This study aimed to ascertain more clearly how time of application and land management practices affect the loss of bromide and metribuzin in a Subarctic soil. Potassium bromide (KBr), a surrogate for nitrate, and metribuzin, commonly used to control broadleaf weeds, were applied in the autumn of 1996 and the spring of 1997 to a silt loam that had been subjected to conventional tillage (CT), minimum tillage (disk once [DO]), and no tillage (NT) since 1983. Superimposed on the tillage treatments were the removal or retention of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) stubble and loose straw. Loss of these chemicals was ascertained by sampling the soil profile at the time of heading of barley, before freeze-up of the soil in autumn, and after spring thaw until September 1998. Tillage and residue treatments did not influence the recovery of autumn-applied or spring-applied Br. However, recovery of Br diminished with time: about 30% of the Br applied in autumn and 45% of that applied in spring remained in the soil profile by September 1998. Tillage, but not residue, treatments influenced the recovery of metribuzin. Recovery of metribuzin at the termination of this study was 6% or more in NT soil and 2% or less in CT and DO soil; greater recovery in NT soil was presumably a result of slower degradation in NT than in CT and DO. This study suggests that bromide (and thus nitrate) and metribuzin are more prone to leaching when applied in autumn and that tillage practices affect retention of metribuzin, but not nitrate, in the soil of Subarctic Alaska. Une utilisation prudente des engrais et des herbicides est cruciale au maintien ou à l’amélioration de la qualité de l’eau de surface et de l’eau souterraine dans les régions subarctiques, mais il existe peu de ...
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
genre Arctic
Subarctic
subarctique*
Alaska
genre_facet Arctic
Subarctic
subarctique*
Alaska
id ftunivcalgaryojs:oai:journalhosting.ucalgary.ca:article/63488
institution Open Polar
language English
op_collection_id ftunivcalgaryojs
op_relation https://journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/arctic/article/view/63488/47425
https://journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/arctic/article/view/63488
op_source ARCTIC; Vol. 58 No. 3 (2005): September: 233–329; 260-267
1923-1245
0004-0843
publishDate 2010
publisher The Arctic Institute of North America
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivcalgaryojs:oai:journalhosting.ucalgary.ca:article/63488 2025-06-15T14:14:54+00:00 Dissipation of Bromide and Metribuzin Affected by Tillage and Crop Residue Management in Subarctic Alaska Sharratt, Brenton S. Knight, Charles W. 2010-01-29 application/pdf https://journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/arctic/article/view/63488 eng eng The Arctic Institute of North America https://journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/arctic/article/view/63488/47425 https://journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/arctic/article/view/63488 ARCTIC; Vol. 58 No. 3 (2005): September: 233–329; 260-267 1923-1245 0004-0843 herbicide retention leaching solute nitrate rétention lessivage soluté info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion research-article 2010 ftunivcalgaryojs 2025-05-27T03:29:43Z Prudent use of agricultural fertilizers and herbicides is paramount for sustaining or improving surface and ground water quality in Subarctic regions, but little information is available that documents the loss of chemicals from agricultural lands in the Subarctic. This study aimed to ascertain more clearly how time of application and land management practices affect the loss of bromide and metribuzin in a Subarctic soil. Potassium bromide (KBr), a surrogate for nitrate, and metribuzin, commonly used to control broadleaf weeds, were applied in the autumn of 1996 and the spring of 1997 to a silt loam that had been subjected to conventional tillage (CT), minimum tillage (disk once [DO]), and no tillage (NT) since 1983. Superimposed on the tillage treatments were the removal or retention of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) stubble and loose straw. Loss of these chemicals was ascertained by sampling the soil profile at the time of heading of barley, before freeze-up of the soil in autumn, and after spring thaw until September 1998. Tillage and residue treatments did not influence the recovery of autumn-applied or spring-applied Br. However, recovery of Br diminished with time: about 30% of the Br applied in autumn and 45% of that applied in spring remained in the soil profile by September 1998. Tillage, but not residue, treatments influenced the recovery of metribuzin. Recovery of metribuzin at the termination of this study was 6% or more in NT soil and 2% or less in CT and DO soil; greater recovery in NT soil was presumably a result of slower degradation in NT than in CT and DO. This study suggests that bromide (and thus nitrate) and metribuzin are more prone to leaching when applied in autumn and that tillage practices affect retention of metribuzin, but not nitrate, in the soil of Subarctic Alaska. Une utilisation prudente des engrais et des herbicides est cruciale au maintien ou à l’amélioration de la qualité de l’eau de surface et de l’eau souterraine dans les régions subarctiques, mais il existe peu de ... Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Subarctic subarctique* Alaska Unknown ARCTIC 58 3
spellingShingle herbicide
retention
leaching
solute
nitrate
rétention
lessivage
soluté
Sharratt, Brenton S.
Knight, Charles W.
Dissipation of Bromide and Metribuzin Affected by Tillage and Crop Residue Management in Subarctic Alaska
title Dissipation of Bromide and Metribuzin Affected by Tillage and Crop Residue Management in Subarctic Alaska
title_full Dissipation of Bromide and Metribuzin Affected by Tillage and Crop Residue Management in Subarctic Alaska
title_fullStr Dissipation of Bromide and Metribuzin Affected by Tillage and Crop Residue Management in Subarctic Alaska
title_full_unstemmed Dissipation of Bromide and Metribuzin Affected by Tillage and Crop Residue Management in Subarctic Alaska
title_short Dissipation of Bromide and Metribuzin Affected by Tillage and Crop Residue Management in Subarctic Alaska
title_sort dissipation of bromide and metribuzin affected by tillage and crop residue management in subarctic alaska
topic herbicide
retention
leaching
solute
nitrate
rétention
lessivage
soluté
topic_facet herbicide
retention
leaching
solute
nitrate
rétention
lessivage
soluté
url https://journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/arctic/article/view/63488