Something Has to Give: Why Delays Are the New Reality of Canada’s Defence Procurement Strategy

Recent waves of political controversy over military procurement programs, most notably the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter project, are symptoms of an ongoing and increasingly strategic choice Canada is making in the way it equips its military. From the failure to settle on a design for the Arctic/Offshor...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sloan, Elinor
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: University of Calgary 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/sppp/article/view/42485
id ftunivcalgaryojs:oai:journalhosting.ucalgary.ca:article/42485
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivcalgaryojs:oai:journalhosting.ucalgary.ca:article/42485 2024-09-09T19:28:00+00:00 Something Has to Give: Why Delays Are the New Reality of Canada’s Defence Procurement Strategy Sloan, Elinor 2014-10-20 application/pdf https://journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/sppp/article/view/42485 eng eng University of Calgary https://journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/sppp/article/view/42485/30376 https://journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/sppp/article/view/42485 Copyright (c) 2017 The School of Public Policy Publications The School of Public Policy Publications; Vol. 7 (2014) 2560-8320 2560-8312 10.11575/sppp.v7i0 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion "Peer-reviewed Article" 2014 ftunivcalgaryojs https://doi.org/10.11575/sppp.v7i0 2024-07-25T03:16:02Z Recent waves of political controversy over military procurement programs, most notably the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter project, are symptoms of an ongoing and increasingly strategic choice Canada is making in the way it equips its military. From the failure to settle on a design for the Arctic/Offshore Patrol Ship (which had an originally planned delivery date of 2013), to the un-awarded contracts for new fixed-wing search and rescue aircraft (initially anticipated nearly a decade ago) and the incomplete Integrated Soldier-System Project (once expected to be active by this year); to the delay in cutting the steel for the Joint Support Ship (initial delivery planned for 2012) needed to replace vessels that are now being decommissioned, Canadians are witnessing the results of a new philosophy behind the government’s procurement process. Canadian governments have always insisted on industrial and regional benefits for Canada when buying military equipment. But the massive defence spending promised under the 2008 Canada First Defence Strategy exacerbated this approach. The emphasis has now formally been placed on favouring industrial benefits for Canada in defence acquisitions, while heightened political cautiousness has placed a higher priority on ensuring maximum value for taxpayer money with a zero tolerance for mistakes environment.A relatively small Canadian defence budget has put pressure on military officials to be creative about ordering new equipment — in some cases, perhaps too creative. Officials have taken to commissioning vehicles and equipment that are more versatile and are capable of carrying out more than their traditional functions. In certain instances, this has meant wish lists that cannot be fulfilled in the expected time frame, or even at all. This is the case, for example, with the Joint Support Ship, which went from a plan for new refuelling and replenishment ships to one for vessels that could also provide a command and control centre for forces ashore and sealift for ground forces, including ... Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic University of Calgary Journal Hosting Arctic Canada
institution Open Polar
collection University of Calgary Journal Hosting
op_collection_id ftunivcalgaryojs
language English
description Recent waves of political controversy over military procurement programs, most notably the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter project, are symptoms of an ongoing and increasingly strategic choice Canada is making in the way it equips its military. From the failure to settle on a design for the Arctic/Offshore Patrol Ship (which had an originally planned delivery date of 2013), to the un-awarded contracts for new fixed-wing search and rescue aircraft (initially anticipated nearly a decade ago) and the incomplete Integrated Soldier-System Project (once expected to be active by this year); to the delay in cutting the steel for the Joint Support Ship (initial delivery planned for 2012) needed to replace vessels that are now being decommissioned, Canadians are witnessing the results of a new philosophy behind the government’s procurement process. Canadian governments have always insisted on industrial and regional benefits for Canada when buying military equipment. But the massive defence spending promised under the 2008 Canada First Defence Strategy exacerbated this approach. The emphasis has now formally been placed on favouring industrial benefits for Canada in defence acquisitions, while heightened political cautiousness has placed a higher priority on ensuring maximum value for taxpayer money with a zero tolerance for mistakes environment.A relatively small Canadian defence budget has put pressure on military officials to be creative about ordering new equipment — in some cases, perhaps too creative. Officials have taken to commissioning vehicles and equipment that are more versatile and are capable of carrying out more than their traditional functions. In certain instances, this has meant wish lists that cannot be fulfilled in the expected time frame, or even at all. This is the case, for example, with the Joint Support Ship, which went from a plan for new refuelling and replenishment ships to one for vessels that could also provide a command and control centre for forces ashore and sealift for ground forces, including ...
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Sloan, Elinor
spellingShingle Sloan, Elinor
Something Has to Give: Why Delays Are the New Reality of Canada’s Defence Procurement Strategy
author_facet Sloan, Elinor
author_sort Sloan, Elinor
title Something Has to Give: Why Delays Are the New Reality of Canada’s Defence Procurement Strategy
title_short Something Has to Give: Why Delays Are the New Reality of Canada’s Defence Procurement Strategy
title_full Something Has to Give: Why Delays Are the New Reality of Canada’s Defence Procurement Strategy
title_fullStr Something Has to Give: Why Delays Are the New Reality of Canada’s Defence Procurement Strategy
title_full_unstemmed Something Has to Give: Why Delays Are the New Reality of Canada’s Defence Procurement Strategy
title_sort something has to give: why delays are the new reality of canada’s defence procurement strategy
publisher University of Calgary
publishDate 2014
url https://journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/sppp/article/view/42485
geographic Arctic
Canada
geographic_facet Arctic
Canada
genre Arctic
genre_facet Arctic
op_source The School of Public Policy Publications; Vol. 7 (2014)
2560-8320
2560-8312
10.11575/sppp.v7i0
op_relation https://journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/sppp/article/view/42485/30376
https://journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/sppp/article/view/42485
op_rights Copyright (c) 2017 The School of Public Policy Publications
op_doi https://doi.org/10.11575/sppp.v7i0
_version_ 1809897299775586304