Assessing Variabilities of Extreme Precipitation and Snow Depth Using Climate and Stochastic Models

• Main Author: Abdelmoaty, Hebatallah
• Other Authors: Papalexiou, Simon, Pietroniro, Alain, Huang, Wendy
• Format: Doctoral or Postdoctoral Thesis
• Language: English
• Published: Graduate Studies 2024
• Subjects: Stochastic Hydrology; Water Resources; Hydrology; Frequency Analysis; Climate Change; Climate Models; Education > Sciences; Climate change
• Online Access: https://hdl.handle.net/1880/117905; https://doi.org/10.11575/PRISM/42748

Floods are natural disasters with a significant impact on regions worldwide. They cause extensive damage to infrastructure, disrupt transportation and communication networks, and lead to the displacement of populations. Moreover, floods have long-term consequences on ecosystems, agriculture, and economies. In recent years, Canada has experienced several devastating flood events, highlighting the nation’s vulnerability to such disasters. Climate change, with its associated extreme weather patterns, has exacerbated the frequency and intensity of these events. Specifically, heavy rainfall and rapid snowmelt have triggered extensive flooding in multiple provinces. As global temperatures rise and weather patterns change, the world must remain vigilant and adapt approaches to address the evolving threat of floods. To address this issue, we present an extensive investigation of climate models’ performance in reproducing annual maxima of daily precipitation (AMP) globally and daily snow depth (SD) in Canadian catchments. We analyze projections for extreme precipitation, emphasizing the importance of adopting non-stationary models. Additionally, we introduce a stochastic model replicating SD time series with the same observed statistical properties to overcome limited observed SD data. These studies employ advanced and novel statistical methods, including bivariate analyses, L-moment metrics, Monte Carlo analysis, and autoregressive models. To accurately assess climate models, we use numerous unique observational datasets, along with the latest generation of climate models, the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6), to reflect recent advances in climate change impacts. First, the results show that 70% of CMIP6 models exhibit a percentage difference of ±10% in annual maxima mean and variation. However, CMIP6 simulations generally overestimate daily SD by at least 10%, with some regions challenging to simulate due to their complex atmospheric and land interactions, such as the Arctic and tropical regions. ...