The legal capture of British Columbia’s fisheries: a study of law and colonialism
This is a study of the human conflict over fish in late nineteenth and early twentieth century British Columbia, and of how that conflict was shaped by law. Law, understood broadly to include both the legal forms of the Canadian state and those of Native peoples, defined and in part created both Nat...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Thesis |
Language: | English |
Published: |
1998
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/2429/8144 |
id |
ftunivbritcolcir:oai:circle.library.ubc.ca:2429/8144 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftunivbritcolcir:oai:circle.library.ubc.ca:2429/8144 2023-05-15T16:17:11+02:00 The legal capture of British Columbia’s fisheries: a study of law and colonialism Harris, Douglas C. 1998 19063506 bytes application/pdf http://hdl.handle.net/2429/8144 eng eng For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use. Fisheries--British Columbia Fishery law and legislation--Canada First Nations--British Columbia--Fishing Text Thesis/Dissertation 1998 ftunivbritcolcir 2019-10-15T17:47:22Z This is a study of the human conflict over fish in late nineteenth and early twentieth century British Columbia, and of how that conflict was shaped by law. Law, understood broadly to include both the legal forms of the Canadian state and those of Native peoples, defined and in part created both Native and state fisheries. When those fisheries clashed, one finds conflict between legal systems. When one fishery sought to replace the other, its laws had to replace the other. Thus, this is a study of law and colonialism, seen through a close analysis of the conflict over fish. Native fisheries and the web of regulation surrounding them preceded non-Native interest in British Columbia's fish. The fishery was not an open-access resource, but rather a commons, defined by entitlements, prohibitions and sanctions that allowed certain activity, proscribed others, permitted one group to catch fish at certain times in particular locations with particular technology, and prohibited others. The Canadian state denied the legitimacy and even the existence of Native fisheries law in imposing its law on the fishery. This study, based largely on government records and a secondary anthropological literature, describes the legal apparatus constructed by the Canadian state to reduce Native control of the fisheries in British Columbia through the creation, in law, of the "Indian food fishery". Law became a means of constructing a particular economic and social order that marginalized Native participation in the fishery and eliminated Native control. It was a "rhetoric of legitimation" that supported state domination, but also local resistance. Native peoples and their supporters used law, both Native and state law, to defend their fisheries. The history of the conflict over fish is the history of competing legal cultures, and the struggle on the Cowichan River and the Babine River over fish weirs reveals those cultures, constructed in opposition to each other. The study concludes by integrating the local conflicts over fish into a wider literature on law and colonialism, reflecting on the role of law in particular colonial settings. Law, Peter A. Allard School of Graduate Thesis First Nations University of British Columbia: cIRcle - UBC's Information Repository Canada Indian British Columbia ENVELOPE(-125.003,-125.003,54.000,54.000) Babine River ENVELOPE(-127.704,-127.704,55.683,55.683) |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
University of British Columbia: cIRcle - UBC's Information Repository |
op_collection_id |
ftunivbritcolcir |
language |
English |
topic |
Fisheries--British Columbia Fishery law and legislation--Canada First Nations--British Columbia--Fishing |
spellingShingle |
Fisheries--British Columbia Fishery law and legislation--Canada First Nations--British Columbia--Fishing Harris, Douglas C. The legal capture of British Columbia’s fisheries: a study of law and colonialism |
topic_facet |
Fisheries--British Columbia Fishery law and legislation--Canada First Nations--British Columbia--Fishing |
description |
This is a study of the human conflict over fish in late nineteenth and early twentieth century British Columbia, and of how that conflict was shaped by law. Law, understood broadly to include both the legal forms of the Canadian state and those of Native peoples, defined and in part created both Native and state fisheries. When those fisheries clashed, one finds conflict between legal systems. When one fishery sought to replace the other, its laws had to replace the other. Thus, this is a study of law and colonialism, seen through a close analysis of the conflict over fish. Native fisheries and the web of regulation surrounding them preceded non-Native interest in British Columbia's fish. The fishery was not an open-access resource, but rather a commons, defined by entitlements, prohibitions and sanctions that allowed certain activity, proscribed others, permitted one group to catch fish at certain times in particular locations with particular technology, and prohibited others. The Canadian state denied the legitimacy and even the existence of Native fisheries law in imposing its law on the fishery. This study, based largely on government records and a secondary anthropological literature, describes the legal apparatus constructed by the Canadian state to reduce Native control of the fisheries in British Columbia through the creation, in law, of the "Indian food fishery". Law became a means of constructing a particular economic and social order that marginalized Native participation in the fishery and eliminated Native control. It was a "rhetoric of legitimation" that supported state domination, but also local resistance. Native peoples and their supporters used law, both Native and state law, to defend their fisheries. The history of the conflict over fish is the history of competing legal cultures, and the struggle on the Cowichan River and the Babine River over fish weirs reveals those cultures, constructed in opposition to each other. The study concludes by integrating the local conflicts over fish into a wider literature on law and colonialism, reflecting on the role of law in particular colonial settings. Law, Peter A. Allard School of Graduate |
format |
Thesis |
author |
Harris, Douglas C. |
author_facet |
Harris, Douglas C. |
author_sort |
Harris, Douglas C. |
title |
The legal capture of British Columbia’s fisheries: a study of law and colonialism |
title_short |
The legal capture of British Columbia’s fisheries: a study of law and colonialism |
title_full |
The legal capture of British Columbia’s fisheries: a study of law and colonialism |
title_fullStr |
The legal capture of British Columbia’s fisheries: a study of law and colonialism |
title_full_unstemmed |
The legal capture of British Columbia’s fisheries: a study of law and colonialism |
title_sort |
legal capture of british columbia’s fisheries: a study of law and colonialism |
publishDate |
1998 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/2429/8144 |
long_lat |
ENVELOPE(-125.003,-125.003,54.000,54.000) ENVELOPE(-127.704,-127.704,55.683,55.683) |
geographic |
Canada Indian British Columbia Babine River |
geographic_facet |
Canada Indian British Columbia Babine River |
genre |
First Nations |
genre_facet |
First Nations |
op_rights |
For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use. |
_version_ |
1766003022114062336 |