Getting to the table: making the decision to negotiate comprehensive land claims in British Columbia

Although the rest of Canada has a long history of treaty making, British Columbia has refused to negotiate treaties with Natives since 1854. In 1991, B.C. reversed this position. Events across Canada in the years 1990 and 1991 provide a case study to explain why this decision was made. Quebec’s Oka...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Thomas, Patty
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: 1994
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2429/5151
id ftunivbritcolcir:oai:circle.library.ubc.ca:2429/5151
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivbritcolcir:oai:circle.library.ubc.ca:2429/5151 2023-05-15T16:15:23+02:00 Getting to the table: making the decision to negotiate comprehensive land claims in British Columbia Thomas, Patty 1994 2024993 bytes application/pdf http://hdl.handle.net/2429/5151 eng eng For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use. First Nations--Canada--Land tenure First Nations--Canada--Government relations--1951- First Nations--Canada--Treaties Oka Crisis Québec 1990 Text Thesis/Dissertation 1994 ftunivbritcolcir 2019-10-15T17:45:34Z Although the rest of Canada has a long history of treaty making, British Columbia has refused to negotiate treaties with Natives since 1854. In 1991, B.C. reversed this position. Events across Canada in the years 1990 and 1991 provide a case study to explain why this decision was made. Quebec’s Oka crisis catalyzed the decision making process underway in B.C. First, during the Oka crisis, B.C. agreed to cooperate with the federal government on a strategy to settle Indian land claims. Second, following the Oka crisis, the First Nations and the federal and provincial governments set up the B.C. Claims Task Force to recommend how these negotiations should proceed. Third, the Task Force made recommendations to address numerous Native grievances and to prevent “another Oka.” Fourth, because of the changed political environment in B.C., both governments accepted all the Task Force’s recommendations by December 10, 1991. It can be argued that B.C. took a rational approach in making this decision to negotiate. The B.C. comprehensive claims conflict can be viewed as part of the evolution of the Native/non—Native relationship in Canada. In early Canada, the two parties initially cooperated through trading and military alliances. Next, in the coercive phase of their relationship, the parties interacted through treaty making and assimilation attempts. Starting in 1969, Natives used protests, lobbying, and legal cases to confront non—Natives. Although B.C. followed a similar pattern, this province’s most notable difference is that no major treaties were signed here. Now, by agreeing to negotiate comprehensive land claims, B.C. is starting to re—establish the cooperative relationship that Natives and non—Natives initially had. Applied Science, Faculty of Community and Regional Planning (SCARP), School of Graduate Thesis First Nations University of British Columbia: cIRcle - UBC's Information Repository Canada Indian British Columbia ENVELOPE(-125.003,-125.003,54.000,54.000)
institution Open Polar
collection University of British Columbia: cIRcle - UBC's Information Repository
op_collection_id ftunivbritcolcir
language English
topic First Nations--Canada--Land tenure
First Nations--Canada--Government relations--1951-
First Nations--Canada--Treaties
Oka Crisis
Québec
1990
spellingShingle First Nations--Canada--Land tenure
First Nations--Canada--Government relations--1951-
First Nations--Canada--Treaties
Oka Crisis
Québec
1990
Thomas, Patty
Getting to the table: making the decision to negotiate comprehensive land claims in British Columbia
topic_facet First Nations--Canada--Land tenure
First Nations--Canada--Government relations--1951-
First Nations--Canada--Treaties
Oka Crisis
Québec
1990
description Although the rest of Canada has a long history of treaty making, British Columbia has refused to negotiate treaties with Natives since 1854. In 1991, B.C. reversed this position. Events across Canada in the years 1990 and 1991 provide a case study to explain why this decision was made. Quebec’s Oka crisis catalyzed the decision making process underway in B.C. First, during the Oka crisis, B.C. agreed to cooperate with the federal government on a strategy to settle Indian land claims. Second, following the Oka crisis, the First Nations and the federal and provincial governments set up the B.C. Claims Task Force to recommend how these negotiations should proceed. Third, the Task Force made recommendations to address numerous Native grievances and to prevent “another Oka.” Fourth, because of the changed political environment in B.C., both governments accepted all the Task Force’s recommendations by December 10, 1991. It can be argued that B.C. took a rational approach in making this decision to negotiate. The B.C. comprehensive claims conflict can be viewed as part of the evolution of the Native/non—Native relationship in Canada. In early Canada, the two parties initially cooperated through trading and military alliances. Next, in the coercive phase of their relationship, the parties interacted through treaty making and assimilation attempts. Starting in 1969, Natives used protests, lobbying, and legal cases to confront non—Natives. Although B.C. followed a similar pattern, this province’s most notable difference is that no major treaties were signed here. Now, by agreeing to negotiate comprehensive land claims, B.C. is starting to re—establish the cooperative relationship that Natives and non—Natives initially had. Applied Science, Faculty of Community and Regional Planning (SCARP), School of Graduate
format Thesis
author Thomas, Patty
author_facet Thomas, Patty
author_sort Thomas, Patty
title Getting to the table: making the decision to negotiate comprehensive land claims in British Columbia
title_short Getting to the table: making the decision to negotiate comprehensive land claims in British Columbia
title_full Getting to the table: making the decision to negotiate comprehensive land claims in British Columbia
title_fullStr Getting to the table: making the decision to negotiate comprehensive land claims in British Columbia
title_full_unstemmed Getting to the table: making the decision to negotiate comprehensive land claims in British Columbia
title_sort getting to the table: making the decision to negotiate comprehensive land claims in british columbia
publishDate 1994
url http://hdl.handle.net/2429/5151
long_lat ENVELOPE(-125.003,-125.003,54.000,54.000)
geographic Canada
Indian
British Columbia
geographic_facet Canada
Indian
British Columbia
genre First Nations
genre_facet First Nations
op_rights For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use.
_version_ 1766001123873783808