Reconciliation 'at the end of the day' : decolonizing territorial governance in British Columbia after Delgamuukw

This dissertation examines new relationships and reconciliation processes between First Nations and the province of British Columbia after the 1997 Supreme Court of Canada ruling in Delgamuukw, a decision that confirmed the continuing existence of Aboriginal title in the absence of treaties. Beginni...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kotaska, Janalyn Gail
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: University of British Columbia 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2429/45003
id ftunivbritcolcir:oai:circle.library.ubc.ca:2429/45003
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivbritcolcir:oai:circle.library.ubc.ca:2429/45003 2023-05-15T16:15:02+02:00 Reconciliation 'at the end of the day' : decolonizing territorial governance in British Columbia after Delgamuukw Kotaska, Janalyn Gail 2013 http://hdl.handle.net/2429/45003 eng eng University of British Columbia Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ CC-BY-NC-ND Text Thesis/Dissertation 2013 ftunivbritcolcir 2019-10-15T18:11:20Z This dissertation examines new relationships and reconciliation processes between First Nations and the province of British Columbia after the 1997 Supreme Court of Canada ruling in Delgamuukw, a decision that confirmed the continuing existence of Aboriginal title in the absence of treaties. Beginning with existing theories and critiques of reconciliation, I construct a framework for evaluating if reconciliation processes, and particularly those related to territorial governance, are genuine. The framework is then applied to an examination of new relationships, including co-governance, and a new Indigenous system of territorial governance: the Coastal First Nations’ Regional Monitoring System. In order to better understand how relationships are changing and competing claims to land and resources are being reconciled, I interviewed First Nation and provincial policy- and decision-makers, engaged in participant-observation as an employee of various First Nation groups, studied a case of Indigenous territorial governance, and analysed documentary evidence. I found that by strategically using the uncertainty of undefined Aboriginal rights, some First Nations are regaining governing power over their territories and inculcating a new vision for reconciliation in the province. Instead of focusing on treaties in a process designed to create certainty for settler governments, reconciliation is now seen by decision-makers on both sides as an incremental and ongoing process of building relationships, creating sustainable economies, co-governing with a common vision, and building capacity to meet these goals. I also argue that, despite systemic change, the relationship between the province and First Nations remains colonial. Ultimately, genuine reconciliation will require a relationship to which First Nations agree. Other requirements include the province relinquishing territorial control and observing Indigenous sovereignty in practice, the province compensating Indigenous peoples for their losses, and both parties negotiating on equal footing the sharing of decision-making authority and revenues where First Nations agree to co-govern. Overall, the study addresses power as yielded not in a single decolonizing act, but through many small acts in an ongoing process of reconciliation, thereby illuminating decolonization as it is currently and arguably occurring. Science, Faculty of Resources, Environment and Sustainability (IRES), Institute for Graduate Thesis First Nations University of British Columbia: cIRcle - UBC's Information Repository British Columbia ENVELOPE(-125.003,-125.003,54.000,54.000) Canada
institution Open Polar
collection University of British Columbia: cIRcle - UBC's Information Repository
op_collection_id ftunivbritcolcir
language English
description This dissertation examines new relationships and reconciliation processes between First Nations and the province of British Columbia after the 1997 Supreme Court of Canada ruling in Delgamuukw, a decision that confirmed the continuing existence of Aboriginal title in the absence of treaties. Beginning with existing theories and critiques of reconciliation, I construct a framework for evaluating if reconciliation processes, and particularly those related to territorial governance, are genuine. The framework is then applied to an examination of new relationships, including co-governance, and a new Indigenous system of territorial governance: the Coastal First Nations’ Regional Monitoring System. In order to better understand how relationships are changing and competing claims to land and resources are being reconciled, I interviewed First Nation and provincial policy- and decision-makers, engaged in participant-observation as an employee of various First Nation groups, studied a case of Indigenous territorial governance, and analysed documentary evidence. I found that by strategically using the uncertainty of undefined Aboriginal rights, some First Nations are regaining governing power over their territories and inculcating a new vision for reconciliation in the province. Instead of focusing on treaties in a process designed to create certainty for settler governments, reconciliation is now seen by decision-makers on both sides as an incremental and ongoing process of building relationships, creating sustainable economies, co-governing with a common vision, and building capacity to meet these goals. I also argue that, despite systemic change, the relationship between the province and First Nations remains colonial. Ultimately, genuine reconciliation will require a relationship to which First Nations agree. Other requirements include the province relinquishing territorial control and observing Indigenous sovereignty in practice, the province compensating Indigenous peoples for their losses, and both parties negotiating on equal footing the sharing of decision-making authority and revenues where First Nations agree to co-govern. Overall, the study addresses power as yielded not in a single decolonizing act, but through many small acts in an ongoing process of reconciliation, thereby illuminating decolonization as it is currently and arguably occurring. Science, Faculty of Resources, Environment and Sustainability (IRES), Institute for Graduate
format Thesis
author Kotaska, Janalyn Gail
spellingShingle Kotaska, Janalyn Gail
Reconciliation 'at the end of the day' : decolonizing territorial governance in British Columbia after Delgamuukw
author_facet Kotaska, Janalyn Gail
author_sort Kotaska, Janalyn Gail
title Reconciliation 'at the end of the day' : decolonizing territorial governance in British Columbia after Delgamuukw
title_short Reconciliation 'at the end of the day' : decolonizing territorial governance in British Columbia after Delgamuukw
title_full Reconciliation 'at the end of the day' : decolonizing territorial governance in British Columbia after Delgamuukw
title_fullStr Reconciliation 'at the end of the day' : decolonizing territorial governance in British Columbia after Delgamuukw
title_full_unstemmed Reconciliation 'at the end of the day' : decolonizing territorial governance in British Columbia after Delgamuukw
title_sort reconciliation 'at the end of the day' : decolonizing territorial governance in british columbia after delgamuukw
publisher University of British Columbia
publishDate 2013
url http://hdl.handle.net/2429/45003
long_lat ENVELOPE(-125.003,-125.003,54.000,54.000)
geographic British Columbia
Canada
geographic_facet British Columbia
Canada
genre First Nations
genre_facet First Nations
op_rights Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
op_rightsnorm CC-BY-NC-ND
_version_ 1766000762756792320