Programs of socio-economic impact management : the Norman Wells project

Social and economic impacts are often by-products of large scale resource development projects. These socio-economic impacts have become an important component of assessment and review processes during the 1970's and are beginning to attract attention as an issue within impact management. Effec...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kerr, Muriel Ann
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: University of British Columbia 1985
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2429/25426
id ftunivbritcolcir:oai:circle.library.ubc.ca:2429/25426
record_format openpolar
institution Open Polar
collection University of British Columbia: cIRcle - UBC's Information Repository
op_collection_id ftunivbritcolcir
language English
topic Norman Wells Project
Oil fields -- Social aspects -- Northwest Territories -- Mackenzie Valley
Environmental impact analysis -- Northwest Territories -- Mackenzie Valley
spellingShingle Norman Wells Project
Oil fields -- Social aspects -- Northwest Territories -- Mackenzie Valley
Environmental impact analysis -- Northwest Territories -- Mackenzie Valley
Kerr, Muriel Ann
Programs of socio-economic impact management : the Norman Wells project
topic_facet Norman Wells Project
Oil fields -- Social aspects -- Northwest Territories -- Mackenzie Valley
Environmental impact analysis -- Northwest Territories -- Mackenzie Valley
description Social and economic impacts are often by-products of large scale resource development projects. These socio-economic impacts have become an important component of assessment and review processes during the 1970's and are beginning to attract attention as an issue within impact management. Effective measures of socio-economic impact management are being sought by industry, government and communities who wish to mitigate or avoid negative impacts and/or to enhance potential positive impacts of development. The Norman Wells Oilfield Expansion and Pipeline Project, approved by the Federal Cabinet on July 30, 1981 was formally assessed as having potentially significant socio-economic impacts. The Federal Government therefore created a number of measures that constituted a socio-economic impact management plan. One of these measures was a benefits package of $21.4 million "to ensure that the training objectives, jobs and business opportunities which we have insisted be part of this project are real and meaningful." The federal government's "coordination approach" to management associated with the Norman Wells Project has been vetted as a model for the management of future development projects. The subject of this thesis is the implementation of two of the impact funding programs within this benefits package. The thesis purpose is to assess the effectiveness of these impact funding initiatives as programs of socio-economic impact management. The descriptions of the two initiatives chosen for this analysis indicate that their general purpose was to involve the Dene Nation and the Metis Association of the Northwest Territories in the initiation of programs of community and social development and of planning support and monitoring for the communities of the Mackenzie Valley. These two programs are the subject of some debate between federal government representatives and representatives of the two native organizations involved in the Norman Wells Project. The key parties-at-interest disagree over the effectiveness of the two initiatives as instruments of socio-economic impact management for the Norman Wells Project. In preparation for the actual analysis of these programs, I first developed a process model for socio-economic impact management. This process model provides the framework within which programs of socio-economic impact management are located. Next, I examined the relationship between the socio-economic issues and anticipated problems identified during the Norman Well's Project review processes and the impact fund initiatives under study. This was achieved through a content analysis of documents produced by the Norman Wells Environmental Assessment and Review Panel (E.A.R.P.) and the National Energy Board. I then examined in full the implementation of the initiatives. This was accomplished through a review of documentation and interviews with the relevant actors associated with the two study impact funding programs. My assessment of the effectiveness of the two study initiatives as programs of socio-economic management is based on a comparison of the implementation of these programs to a set of criteria that reflect the basic requirements of programs of impact management. The two study initiatives failed to satisfy all but the program effectiveness criteria that required a relationship with the public review process concerns. The thesis conclusion, therefore, is that as programs of socio-economic impact management for the Norman Wells Project, the two study initiatives have not been effective. I discuss the basis of this conclusion and propose three recommendations toward the planning for future programs of socio-economic impact management. This thesis contributes to the assessment of the impact management efforts associated with the overall approach to management of the Norman Wells Project. It should be useful for parties involved in the determination of impact management programs in future development projects. This analysis will aid in the planning of effective procedures to reduce negative impacts, thus serving the interests of both those affected directly, and the nation at large. Applied Science, Faculty of Community and Regional Planning (SCARP), School of Graduate
format Thesis
author Kerr, Muriel Ann
author_facet Kerr, Muriel Ann
author_sort Kerr, Muriel Ann
title Programs of socio-economic impact management : the Norman Wells project
title_short Programs of socio-economic impact management : the Norman Wells project
title_full Programs of socio-economic impact management : the Norman Wells project
title_fullStr Programs of socio-economic impact management : the Norman Wells project
title_full_unstemmed Programs of socio-economic impact management : the Norman Wells project
title_sort programs of socio-economic impact management : the norman wells project
publisher University of British Columbia
publishDate 1985
url http://hdl.handle.net/2429/25426
long_lat ENVELOPE(-126.070,-126.070,52.666,52.666)
ENVELOPE(-126.833,-126.833,65.282,65.282)
geographic Mackenzie Valley
Norman Wells
Northwest Territories
geographic_facet Mackenzie Valley
Norman Wells
Northwest Territories
genre Mackenzie Valley
Northwest Territories
genre_facet Mackenzie Valley
Northwest Territories
op_rights For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use.
_version_ 1766065882844364800
spelling ftunivbritcolcir:oai:circle.library.ubc.ca:2429/25426 2023-05-15T17:09:44+02:00 Programs of socio-economic impact management : the Norman Wells project Kerr, Muriel Ann 1985 http://hdl.handle.net/2429/25426 eng eng University of British Columbia For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use. Norman Wells Project Oil fields -- Social aspects -- Northwest Territories -- Mackenzie Valley Environmental impact analysis -- Northwest Territories -- Mackenzie Valley Text Thesis/Dissertation 1985 ftunivbritcolcir 2019-10-15T17:57:44Z Social and economic impacts are often by-products of large scale resource development projects. These socio-economic impacts have become an important component of assessment and review processes during the 1970's and are beginning to attract attention as an issue within impact management. Effective measures of socio-economic impact management are being sought by industry, government and communities who wish to mitigate or avoid negative impacts and/or to enhance potential positive impacts of development. The Norman Wells Oilfield Expansion and Pipeline Project, approved by the Federal Cabinet on July 30, 1981 was formally assessed as having potentially significant socio-economic impacts. The Federal Government therefore created a number of measures that constituted a socio-economic impact management plan. One of these measures was a benefits package of $21.4 million "to ensure that the training objectives, jobs and business opportunities which we have insisted be part of this project are real and meaningful." The federal government's "coordination approach" to management associated with the Norman Wells Project has been vetted as a model for the management of future development projects. The subject of this thesis is the implementation of two of the impact funding programs within this benefits package. The thesis purpose is to assess the effectiveness of these impact funding initiatives as programs of socio-economic impact management. The descriptions of the two initiatives chosen for this analysis indicate that their general purpose was to involve the Dene Nation and the Metis Association of the Northwest Territories in the initiation of programs of community and social development and of planning support and monitoring for the communities of the Mackenzie Valley. These two programs are the subject of some debate between federal government representatives and representatives of the two native organizations involved in the Norman Wells Project. The key parties-at-interest disagree over the effectiveness of the two initiatives as instruments of socio-economic impact management for the Norman Wells Project. In preparation for the actual analysis of these programs, I first developed a process model for socio-economic impact management. This process model provides the framework within which programs of socio-economic impact management are located. Next, I examined the relationship between the socio-economic issues and anticipated problems identified during the Norman Well's Project review processes and the impact fund initiatives under study. This was achieved through a content analysis of documents produced by the Norman Wells Environmental Assessment and Review Panel (E.A.R.P.) and the National Energy Board. I then examined in full the implementation of the initiatives. This was accomplished through a review of documentation and interviews with the relevant actors associated with the two study impact funding programs. My assessment of the effectiveness of the two study initiatives as programs of socio-economic management is based on a comparison of the implementation of these programs to a set of criteria that reflect the basic requirements of programs of impact management. The two study initiatives failed to satisfy all but the program effectiveness criteria that required a relationship with the public review process concerns. The thesis conclusion, therefore, is that as programs of socio-economic impact management for the Norman Wells Project, the two study initiatives have not been effective. I discuss the basis of this conclusion and propose three recommendations toward the planning for future programs of socio-economic impact management. This thesis contributes to the assessment of the impact management efforts associated with the overall approach to management of the Norman Wells Project. It should be useful for parties involved in the determination of impact management programs in future development projects. This analysis will aid in the planning of effective procedures to reduce negative impacts, thus serving the interests of both those affected directly, and the nation at large. Applied Science, Faculty of Community and Regional Planning (SCARP), School of Graduate Thesis Mackenzie Valley Northwest Territories University of British Columbia: cIRcle - UBC's Information Repository Mackenzie Valley ENVELOPE(-126.070,-126.070,52.666,52.666) Norman Wells ENVELOPE(-126.833,-126.833,65.282,65.282) Northwest Territories