Assessing the impacts of human disturbance on wildlife: insights from wildfowl on the Exe Estuary.
In the subject area of conservation and ecology, human disturbance is classified as any anthropogenic activity that elicits a response in an animal that would otherwise not occur under non-human related conditions. When this change in behaviour negatively impacts an animal’s energy budget it has the...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Thesis |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2020
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/34210/ https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/34210/1/BIERMANN,%20Lindsay%20Katherine_Ph.D._2020.pdf |
| Summary: | In the subject area of conservation and ecology, human disturbance is classified as any anthropogenic activity that elicits a response in an animal that would otherwise not occur under non-human related conditions. When this change in behaviour negatively impacts an animal’s energy budget it has the potential to reduce reproductive output and survival, and so ultimately, human disturbance may affect animal populations. Therefore, understanding mechanisms that lead to human disturbance and its energetic cost are vital in understanding if human disturbance may affect animal populations in the present and the future. To investigate these topics, this study looked at different aspects of human disturbance relative to two species of wildfowl, Brent goose (Branta bernicla, L.) and wigeon (Mareca penelope, L.), on the Exe Estuary, during the winters of 2017-2018 and 2018-2019. This included: identifying environmental variables that lead to overlaps in space and time between wildfowl and humans, assessing the disturbance cost within those overlaps, differentiating costs of disturbance relative to human disturbance types, understanding the compensation ability of wildfowl to deal with human disturbance, and identifying the thresholds of human disturbance wildfowl are capable of experiencing without negative impacts. Primary findings indicated that conditions associated with overlaps between wildfowl and humans were predominantly associated with food availability for wildfowl and site accessibility conditions for humans. Within these overlaps, wildfowl were found to be disturbed for a minority of the time, with Brent goose being disturbed approximately 6% of the time, and wigeon being disturbed approximately 5% of the time. Costs associated with these disturbances were found to increase if wildfowl were feeding when disturbed compared to resting. Additionally, overlaps and disturbances from different human activity types were found to vary, indicating that some human activity types may be more threatening, in terms of ... |
|---|