Assessment of Global Ocean Biogeochemistry Models for Ocean Carbon Sink Estimates in RECCAP2 and Recommendations for Future Studies

The ocean is a major carbon sink and takes up 25%–30% of the anthropogenically emitted CO2. A state-of-the-art method to quantify this sink are global ocean biogeochemistry models (GOBMs), but their simulated CO2 uptake differs between models and is systematically lower than estimates based on stati...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
Main Authors: Terhaar, Jens, Goris, Nadine, Müller, Jens D., DeVries, Tim, Gruber, Nicolas, Hauck, Judith, Perez, Fiz F., Séférian, Roland
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: American Geophysical Union 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:https://boris.unibe.ch/194339/1/J_Adv_Model_Earth_Syst_-_2024_-_Terhaar_-_Assessment_of_Global_Ocean_Biogeochemistry_Models_for_Ocean_Carbon_Sink_Estimates.pdf
https://boris.unibe.ch/194339/
id ftunivbern:oai:boris.unibe.ch:194339
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivbern:oai:boris.unibe.ch:194339 2024-04-21T08:12:17+00:00 Assessment of Global Ocean Biogeochemistry Models for Ocean Carbon Sink Estimates in RECCAP2 and Recommendations for Future Studies Terhaar, Jens Goris, Nadine Müller, Jens D. DeVries, Tim Gruber, Nicolas Hauck, Judith Perez, Fiz F. Séférian, Roland 2024 application/pdf https://boris.unibe.ch/194339/1/J_Adv_Model_Earth_Syst_-_2024_-_Terhaar_-_Assessment_of_Global_Ocean_Biogeochemistry_Models_for_Ocean_Carbon_Sink_Estimates.pdf https://boris.unibe.ch/194339/ eng eng American Geophysical Union https://boris.unibe.ch/194339/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Terhaar, Jens; Goris, Nadine; Müller, Jens D.; DeVries, Tim; Gruber, Nicolas; Hauck, Judith; Perez, Fiz F.; Séférian, Roland (2024). Assessment of Global Ocean Biogeochemistry Models for Ocean Carbon Sink Estimates in RECCAP2 and Recommendations for Future Studies. Journal of advances in modeling earth systems : JAMES, 16(3) American Geophysical Union 10.1029/2023MS003840 <http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2023MS003840> 530 Physics 550 Earth sciences & geology info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion PeerReviewed 2024 ftunivbern https://doi.org/10.1029/2023MS003840 2024-03-27T15:06:35Z The ocean is a major carbon sink and takes up 25%–30% of the anthropogenically emitted CO2. A state-of-the-art method to quantify this sink are global ocean biogeochemistry models (GOBMs), but their simulated CO2 uptake differs between models and is systematically lower than estimates based on statistical methods using surface ocean pCO2 and interior ocean measurements. Here, we provide an in-depth evaluation of ocean carbon sink estimates from 1980 to 2018 from a GOBM ensemble. As sources of inter-model differences and ensemble-mean biases our study identifies (a) the model setup, such as the length of the spin-up, the starting date of the simulation, and carbon fluxes from rivers and into sediments, (b) the simulated ocean circulation, such as Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation and Southern Ocean mode and intermediate water formation, and (c) the simulated oceanic buffer capacity. Our analysis suggests that a late starting date and biases in the ocean circulation cause a too low anthropogenic CO2 uptake across the GOBM ensemble. Surface ocean biogeochemistry biases might also cause simulated anthropogenic fluxes to be too low, but the current setup prevents a robust assessment. For simulations of the ocean carbon sink, we recommend in the short-term to (a) start simulations at a common date before the industrialization and the associated atmospheric CO2 increase, (b) conduct a sufficiently long spin-up such that the GOBMs reach steady-state, and (c) provide key metrics for circulation, biogeochemistry, and the land-ocean interface. In the long-term, we recommend improving the representation of these metrics in the GOBMs. Article in Journal/Newspaper Southern Ocean BORIS (Bern Open Repository and Information System, University of Bern) Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems 16 3
institution Open Polar
collection BORIS (Bern Open Repository and Information System, University of Bern)
op_collection_id ftunivbern
language English
topic 530 Physics
550 Earth sciences & geology
spellingShingle 530 Physics
550 Earth sciences & geology
Terhaar, Jens
Goris, Nadine
Müller, Jens D.
DeVries, Tim
Gruber, Nicolas
Hauck, Judith
Perez, Fiz F.
Séférian, Roland
Assessment of Global Ocean Biogeochemistry Models for Ocean Carbon Sink Estimates in RECCAP2 and Recommendations for Future Studies
topic_facet 530 Physics
550 Earth sciences & geology
description The ocean is a major carbon sink and takes up 25%–30% of the anthropogenically emitted CO2. A state-of-the-art method to quantify this sink are global ocean biogeochemistry models (GOBMs), but their simulated CO2 uptake differs between models and is systematically lower than estimates based on statistical methods using surface ocean pCO2 and interior ocean measurements. Here, we provide an in-depth evaluation of ocean carbon sink estimates from 1980 to 2018 from a GOBM ensemble. As sources of inter-model differences and ensemble-mean biases our study identifies (a) the model setup, such as the length of the spin-up, the starting date of the simulation, and carbon fluxes from rivers and into sediments, (b) the simulated ocean circulation, such as Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation and Southern Ocean mode and intermediate water formation, and (c) the simulated oceanic buffer capacity. Our analysis suggests that a late starting date and biases in the ocean circulation cause a too low anthropogenic CO2 uptake across the GOBM ensemble. Surface ocean biogeochemistry biases might also cause simulated anthropogenic fluxes to be too low, but the current setup prevents a robust assessment. For simulations of the ocean carbon sink, we recommend in the short-term to (a) start simulations at a common date before the industrialization and the associated atmospheric CO2 increase, (b) conduct a sufficiently long spin-up such that the GOBMs reach steady-state, and (c) provide key metrics for circulation, biogeochemistry, and the land-ocean interface. In the long-term, we recommend improving the representation of these metrics in the GOBMs.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Terhaar, Jens
Goris, Nadine
Müller, Jens D.
DeVries, Tim
Gruber, Nicolas
Hauck, Judith
Perez, Fiz F.
Séférian, Roland
author_facet Terhaar, Jens
Goris, Nadine
Müller, Jens D.
DeVries, Tim
Gruber, Nicolas
Hauck, Judith
Perez, Fiz F.
Séférian, Roland
author_sort Terhaar, Jens
title Assessment of Global Ocean Biogeochemistry Models for Ocean Carbon Sink Estimates in RECCAP2 and Recommendations for Future Studies
title_short Assessment of Global Ocean Biogeochemistry Models for Ocean Carbon Sink Estimates in RECCAP2 and Recommendations for Future Studies
title_full Assessment of Global Ocean Biogeochemistry Models for Ocean Carbon Sink Estimates in RECCAP2 and Recommendations for Future Studies
title_fullStr Assessment of Global Ocean Biogeochemistry Models for Ocean Carbon Sink Estimates in RECCAP2 and Recommendations for Future Studies
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of Global Ocean Biogeochemistry Models for Ocean Carbon Sink Estimates in RECCAP2 and Recommendations for Future Studies
title_sort assessment of global ocean biogeochemistry models for ocean carbon sink estimates in reccap2 and recommendations for future studies
publisher American Geophysical Union
publishDate 2024
url https://boris.unibe.ch/194339/1/J_Adv_Model_Earth_Syst_-_2024_-_Terhaar_-_Assessment_of_Global_Ocean_Biogeochemistry_Models_for_Ocean_Carbon_Sink_Estimates.pdf
https://boris.unibe.ch/194339/
genre Southern Ocean
genre_facet Southern Ocean
op_source Terhaar, Jens; Goris, Nadine; Müller, Jens D.; DeVries, Tim; Gruber, Nicolas; Hauck, Judith; Perez, Fiz F.; Séférian, Roland (2024). Assessment of Global Ocean Biogeochemistry Models for Ocean Carbon Sink Estimates in RECCAP2 and Recommendations for Future Studies. Journal of advances in modeling earth systems : JAMES, 16(3) American Geophysical Union 10.1029/2023MS003840 <http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2023MS003840>
op_relation https://boris.unibe.ch/194339/
op_rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1029/2023MS003840
container_title Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
container_volume 16
container_issue 3
_version_ 1796932283111833600