A quantitative comparison of microfossil extraction methods from ice cores

Microfossil records from ice archives allow vegetation, fire and land-use activity reconstructions on broad spatial scales. Samples typically contain low microfossil concentrations. Therefore, large ice volumes are often needed for palynology. Hence, it is crucial to extract maximum microfossil numb...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Glaciology
Main Authors: Brügger, Sandra O., Gobet, Erika, Schanz, Federica R., Heiri, Oliver, Schwörer, Christoph, Sigl, Michael, Schwikowski, Margit, Tinner, Willy
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: International Glaciological Society 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://boris.unibe.ch/117127/1/2018_JGlaciol_64_432.pdf
https://boris.unibe.ch/117127/
id ftunivbern:oai:boris.unibe.ch:117127
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivbern:oai:boris.unibe.ch:117127 2023-08-20T04:07:38+02:00 A quantitative comparison of microfossil extraction methods from ice cores Brügger, Sandra O. Gobet, Erika Schanz, Federica R. Heiri, Oliver Schwörer, Christoph Sigl, Michael Schwikowski, Margit Tinner, Willy 2018-06 application/pdf https://boris.unibe.ch/117127/1/2018_JGlaciol_64_432.pdf https://boris.unibe.ch/117127/ eng eng International Glaciological Society https://boris.unibe.ch/117127/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Brügger, Sandra O.; Gobet, Erika; Schanz, Federica R.; Heiri, Oliver; Schwörer, Christoph; Sigl, Michael; Schwikowski, Margit; Tinner, Willy (2018). A quantitative comparison of microfossil extraction methods from ice cores. Journal of glaciology, 64(245), pp. 432-442. International Glaciological Society 10.1017/jog.2018.31 <http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/jog.2018.31> 540 Chemistry 570 Life sciences biology 580 Plants (Botany) info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion PeerReviewed 2018 ftunivbern https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2018.31 2023-07-31T21:44:40Z Microfossil records from ice archives allow vegetation, fire and land-use activity reconstructions on broad spatial scales. Samples typically contain low microfossil concentrations. Therefore, large ice volumes are often needed for palynology. Hence, it is crucial to extract maximum microfossil numbers through appropriate physical-chemical treatments. We compare six methods covering the main water reduction procedures: evaporation, filtration and centrifugation with snow samples. Adding a known number of Lycopodium marker spores prior to sample treatment and a second marker (Eucalyptus) after laboratory processing allows a quantitative microfossil loss assessment during pollen extraction. We applied the best-performing method (average loss of 22%) to high-alpine firn cores from Colle Gnifetti glacier for validation with a natural archive containing extremely low microfossil concentrations. We conclude that samples processed with different microfossil extraction protocols may give different results for pollen concentrations, percentages and ratios between different pollen types, especially if vesiculate conifer pollen is an important pollen assemblage component. We recommend a new evaporation-based method which delivers the smallest and least variable losses among the tested approaches. Since microfossil losses are inevitable during laboratory procedure, adding markers prior to sample processing is mandatory to achieve reliable microfossil concentration and influx estimates. Article in Journal/Newspaper Journal of Glaciology BORIS (Bern Open Repository and Information System, University of Bern) Journal of Glaciology 64 245 432 442
institution Open Polar
collection BORIS (Bern Open Repository and Information System, University of Bern)
op_collection_id ftunivbern
language English
topic 540 Chemistry
570 Life sciences
biology
580 Plants (Botany)
spellingShingle 540 Chemistry
570 Life sciences
biology
580 Plants (Botany)
Brügger, Sandra O.
Gobet, Erika
Schanz, Federica R.
Heiri, Oliver
Schwörer, Christoph
Sigl, Michael
Schwikowski, Margit
Tinner, Willy
A quantitative comparison of microfossil extraction methods from ice cores
topic_facet 540 Chemistry
570 Life sciences
biology
580 Plants (Botany)
description Microfossil records from ice archives allow vegetation, fire and land-use activity reconstructions on broad spatial scales. Samples typically contain low microfossil concentrations. Therefore, large ice volumes are often needed for palynology. Hence, it is crucial to extract maximum microfossil numbers through appropriate physical-chemical treatments. We compare six methods covering the main water reduction procedures: evaporation, filtration and centrifugation with snow samples. Adding a known number of Lycopodium marker spores prior to sample treatment and a second marker (Eucalyptus) after laboratory processing allows a quantitative microfossil loss assessment during pollen extraction. We applied the best-performing method (average loss of 22%) to high-alpine firn cores from Colle Gnifetti glacier for validation with a natural archive containing extremely low microfossil concentrations. We conclude that samples processed with different microfossil extraction protocols may give different results for pollen concentrations, percentages and ratios between different pollen types, especially if vesiculate conifer pollen is an important pollen assemblage component. We recommend a new evaporation-based method which delivers the smallest and least variable losses among the tested approaches. Since microfossil losses are inevitable during laboratory procedure, adding markers prior to sample processing is mandatory to achieve reliable microfossil concentration and influx estimates.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Brügger, Sandra O.
Gobet, Erika
Schanz, Federica R.
Heiri, Oliver
Schwörer, Christoph
Sigl, Michael
Schwikowski, Margit
Tinner, Willy
author_facet Brügger, Sandra O.
Gobet, Erika
Schanz, Federica R.
Heiri, Oliver
Schwörer, Christoph
Sigl, Michael
Schwikowski, Margit
Tinner, Willy
author_sort Brügger, Sandra O.
title A quantitative comparison of microfossil extraction methods from ice cores
title_short A quantitative comparison of microfossil extraction methods from ice cores
title_full A quantitative comparison of microfossil extraction methods from ice cores
title_fullStr A quantitative comparison of microfossil extraction methods from ice cores
title_full_unstemmed A quantitative comparison of microfossil extraction methods from ice cores
title_sort quantitative comparison of microfossil extraction methods from ice cores
publisher International Glaciological Society
publishDate 2018
url https://boris.unibe.ch/117127/1/2018_JGlaciol_64_432.pdf
https://boris.unibe.ch/117127/
genre Journal of Glaciology
genre_facet Journal of Glaciology
op_source Brügger, Sandra O.; Gobet, Erika; Schanz, Federica R.; Heiri, Oliver; Schwörer, Christoph; Sigl, Michael; Schwikowski, Margit; Tinner, Willy (2018). A quantitative comparison of microfossil extraction methods from ice cores. Journal of glaciology, 64(245), pp. 432-442. International Glaciological Society 10.1017/jog.2018.31 <http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/jog.2018.31>
op_relation https://boris.unibe.ch/117127/
op_rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2018.31
container_title Journal of Glaciology
container_volume 64
container_issue 245
container_start_page 432
op_container_end_page 442
_version_ 1774719419778334720