An intercomparison between the surface heat flux feedback in five coupled models, COADS and the NCEP reanalysis

The surface heat flux feedback is estimated in the Atlantic and the extra-tropical Indo-Pacific, using monthly heat flux and sea surface temperature anomaly data from control simulations with five global climate models, and it is compared to estimates derived from COADS and the NCEP reanalysis. In a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Climate Dynamics
Main Authors: Frankignoul, C., Kestenare, E., Botzet, M., Carril, A. F., Drange, Helge, Pardaens, A., Terray, L., Sutton, R.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Springer Verlag 2004
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/1956/621
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-003-0388-3
id ftunivbergen:oai:bora.uib.no:1956/621
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivbergen:oai:bora.uib.no:1956/621 2023-05-15T17:36:31+02:00 An intercomparison between the surface heat flux feedback in five coupled models, COADS and the NCEP reanalysis Frankignoul, C. Kestenare, E. Botzet, M. Carril, A. F. Drange, Helge Pardaens, A. Terray, L. Sutton, R. 2004-04 1602960 bytes application/pdf https://hdl.handle.net/1956/621 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-003-0388-3 eng eng Springer Verlag urn:issn:0930-7575 https://hdl.handle.net/1956/621 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-003-0388-3 Copyright Springer-Verlag 2004 Climate Dynamics 22 4 373-388 Journal article Peer reviewed 2004 ftunivbergen https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-003-0388-3 2023-03-14T17:39:58Z The surface heat flux feedback is estimated in the Atlantic and the extra-tropical Indo-Pacific, using monthly heat flux and sea surface temperature anomaly data from control simulations with five global climate models, and it is compared to estimates derived from COADS and the NCEP reanalysis. In all data sets, the heat flux feedback is negative nearly everywhere and damps the sea surface temperature anomalies. At extratropical latitudes, it is strongly dominated by the turbulent fluxes. The radiative feedback can be positive or negative, depending on location and season, but it remains small, except in some models in the tropical Atlantic. The negative heat flux feedback is strong in the mid-latitude storm tracks, exceeding 40 W m-2 K-1 at place, but in the Northern Hemisphere it is substantially underestimated in several models. The negative feedback weakens at high latitudes, although the models do not reproduce the weak positive feedback found in NCEP in the northern North Atlantic. The main differences are found in the tropical Atlantic where the heat flux feedback is weakly negative in some models , as in the observations, and strongly negative in others where it can exceed 30 W m-2 K-1 at large scales, in part because of a strong contribution of the radiative fluxes, in particular during spring. A comparison between models with similar atmospheric or oceanic components suggests that the atmospheric model is primarily responsible for the heat flux feedback differences at extra-tropical latitudes. In the tropical Atlantic, the ocean behavior plays an equal role. The differences in heat flux feedback in the tropical Atlantic are reflected in the sea surface temperature anomaly persistence, which is too small in models where the heat flux damping is large. A good representation of the heat flux feedback is thus required to simulate climate variability realistically. acceptedVersion Article in Journal/Newspaper North Atlantic University of Bergen: Bergen Open Research Archive (BORA-UiB) Pacific Climate Dynamics 22 4 373 388
institution Open Polar
collection University of Bergen: Bergen Open Research Archive (BORA-UiB)
op_collection_id ftunivbergen
language English
description The surface heat flux feedback is estimated in the Atlantic and the extra-tropical Indo-Pacific, using monthly heat flux and sea surface temperature anomaly data from control simulations with five global climate models, and it is compared to estimates derived from COADS and the NCEP reanalysis. In all data sets, the heat flux feedback is negative nearly everywhere and damps the sea surface temperature anomalies. At extratropical latitudes, it is strongly dominated by the turbulent fluxes. The radiative feedback can be positive or negative, depending on location and season, but it remains small, except in some models in the tropical Atlantic. The negative heat flux feedback is strong in the mid-latitude storm tracks, exceeding 40 W m-2 K-1 at place, but in the Northern Hemisphere it is substantially underestimated in several models. The negative feedback weakens at high latitudes, although the models do not reproduce the weak positive feedback found in NCEP in the northern North Atlantic. The main differences are found in the tropical Atlantic where the heat flux feedback is weakly negative in some models , as in the observations, and strongly negative in others where it can exceed 30 W m-2 K-1 at large scales, in part because of a strong contribution of the radiative fluxes, in particular during spring. A comparison between models with similar atmospheric or oceanic components suggests that the atmospheric model is primarily responsible for the heat flux feedback differences at extra-tropical latitudes. In the tropical Atlantic, the ocean behavior plays an equal role. The differences in heat flux feedback in the tropical Atlantic are reflected in the sea surface temperature anomaly persistence, which is too small in models where the heat flux damping is large. A good representation of the heat flux feedback is thus required to simulate climate variability realistically. acceptedVersion
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Frankignoul, C.
Kestenare, E.
Botzet, M.
Carril, A. F.
Drange, Helge
Pardaens, A.
Terray, L.
Sutton, R.
spellingShingle Frankignoul, C.
Kestenare, E.
Botzet, M.
Carril, A. F.
Drange, Helge
Pardaens, A.
Terray, L.
Sutton, R.
An intercomparison between the surface heat flux feedback in five coupled models, COADS and the NCEP reanalysis
author_facet Frankignoul, C.
Kestenare, E.
Botzet, M.
Carril, A. F.
Drange, Helge
Pardaens, A.
Terray, L.
Sutton, R.
author_sort Frankignoul, C.
title An intercomparison between the surface heat flux feedback in five coupled models, COADS and the NCEP reanalysis
title_short An intercomparison between the surface heat flux feedback in five coupled models, COADS and the NCEP reanalysis
title_full An intercomparison between the surface heat flux feedback in five coupled models, COADS and the NCEP reanalysis
title_fullStr An intercomparison between the surface heat flux feedback in five coupled models, COADS and the NCEP reanalysis
title_full_unstemmed An intercomparison between the surface heat flux feedback in five coupled models, COADS and the NCEP reanalysis
title_sort intercomparison between the surface heat flux feedback in five coupled models, coads and the ncep reanalysis
publisher Springer Verlag
publishDate 2004
url https://hdl.handle.net/1956/621
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-003-0388-3
geographic Pacific
geographic_facet Pacific
genre North Atlantic
genre_facet North Atlantic
op_source Climate Dynamics
22
4
373-388
op_relation urn:issn:0930-7575
https://hdl.handle.net/1956/621
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-003-0388-3
op_rights Copyright Springer-Verlag 2004
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-003-0388-3
container_title Climate Dynamics
container_volume 22
container_issue 4
container_start_page 373
op_container_end_page 388
_version_ 1766136023555768320