Assessment of Atmospheric Reanalyses With Independent Observations in the Weddell Sea, the Antarctic

Surface layer and upper‐air in situ observations from two research vessel cruises and an ice station in the Weddell Sea from 1992 and 1996 are used to validate four current atmospheric reanalysis products: ERA‐Interim, CFSR, JRA‐55, and MERRA‐2. Three of the observation data sets were not available...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Main Authors: Jonassen, Marius Opsanger, Valisuo, Ilona, Vihma, Timo, Uotila, Petteri, Makshtas, Alexander, P., Launiainen, Jouko
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: AGU 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/1956/22943
https://doi.org/10.1029/2019jd030897
id ftunivbergen:oai:bora.uib.no:1956/22943
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivbergen:oai:bora.uib.no:1956/22943 2023-05-15T13:49:22+02:00 Assessment of Atmospheric Reanalyses With Independent Observations in the Weddell Sea, the Antarctic Jonassen, Marius Opsanger Valisuo, Ilona Vihma, Timo Uotila, Petteri Makshtas, Alexander, P. Launiainen, Jouko 2020-02-10T14:44:27Z application/pdf https://hdl.handle.net/1956/22943 https://doi.org/10.1029/2019jd030897 eng eng AGU urn:issn:2169-9402 urn:issn:2169-9380 https://hdl.handle.net/1956/22943 https://doi.org/10.1029/2019jd030897 cristin:1784077 Attribution CC BY http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 Copyright 2019 The Author(s) Journal of Geophysical Research (JGR): Space Physics Peer reviewed Journal article 2020 ftunivbergen https://doi.org/10.1029/2019jd030897 2023-03-14T17:43:33Z Surface layer and upper‐air in situ observations from two research vessel cruises and an ice station in the Weddell Sea from 1992 and 1996 are used to validate four current atmospheric reanalysis products: ERA‐Interim, CFSR, JRA‐55, and MERRA‐2. Three of the observation data sets were not available for assimilation, providing a rare opportunity to validate the reanalyses in the otherwise datasparse region of the Antarctic against independent data. All four reanalyses produce 2 m temperatures warmer than the observations, and the biases vary from +2.0 K in CFSR to +2.8 K in MERRA‐2. All four reanalyses are generally too warm also higher up in the atmospheric boundary layer (ABL), with biases up to +1.4 K (ERA‐Interim). Cloud fractions are relatively poorly reproduced by the reanalyses, MERRA‐2 and JRA‐55 having the strongest positive and negative biases of about +30 % and −17 %, respectively. Skill scores of the error statistics reveal that ERA‐Interim compares generally the most favorably against both the surface layer and the upper‐air observations. CFSR compares the second best and JRA‐55 and MERRA‐2 have the least favorable scores. The ABL warm bias is consistent with previous evaluation studies in high latitudes, where more recent observations have been applied. As the amount of observations has varied depending on the decade, season, and region, the consistency of the warm bias suggests a need to improve the modeling systems, including data assimilation as well as ABL and surface parameterizations. publishedVersion Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctic Weddell Sea University of Bergen: Bergen Open Research Archive (BORA-UiB) Antarctic Merra ENVELOPE(12.615,12.615,65.816,65.816) The Antarctic Weddell Weddell Sea Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 124 23 12468 12484
institution Open Polar
collection University of Bergen: Bergen Open Research Archive (BORA-UiB)
op_collection_id ftunivbergen
language English
description Surface layer and upper‐air in situ observations from two research vessel cruises and an ice station in the Weddell Sea from 1992 and 1996 are used to validate four current atmospheric reanalysis products: ERA‐Interim, CFSR, JRA‐55, and MERRA‐2. Three of the observation data sets were not available for assimilation, providing a rare opportunity to validate the reanalyses in the otherwise datasparse region of the Antarctic against independent data. All four reanalyses produce 2 m temperatures warmer than the observations, and the biases vary from +2.0 K in CFSR to +2.8 K in MERRA‐2. All four reanalyses are generally too warm also higher up in the atmospheric boundary layer (ABL), with biases up to +1.4 K (ERA‐Interim). Cloud fractions are relatively poorly reproduced by the reanalyses, MERRA‐2 and JRA‐55 having the strongest positive and negative biases of about +30 % and −17 %, respectively. Skill scores of the error statistics reveal that ERA‐Interim compares generally the most favorably against both the surface layer and the upper‐air observations. CFSR compares the second best and JRA‐55 and MERRA‐2 have the least favorable scores. The ABL warm bias is consistent with previous evaluation studies in high latitudes, where more recent observations have been applied. As the amount of observations has varied depending on the decade, season, and region, the consistency of the warm bias suggests a need to improve the modeling systems, including data assimilation as well as ABL and surface parameterizations. publishedVersion
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Jonassen, Marius Opsanger
Valisuo, Ilona
Vihma, Timo
Uotila, Petteri
Makshtas, Alexander, P.
Launiainen, Jouko
spellingShingle Jonassen, Marius Opsanger
Valisuo, Ilona
Vihma, Timo
Uotila, Petteri
Makshtas, Alexander, P.
Launiainen, Jouko
Assessment of Atmospheric Reanalyses With Independent Observations in the Weddell Sea, the Antarctic
author_facet Jonassen, Marius Opsanger
Valisuo, Ilona
Vihma, Timo
Uotila, Petteri
Makshtas, Alexander, P.
Launiainen, Jouko
author_sort Jonassen, Marius Opsanger
title Assessment of Atmospheric Reanalyses With Independent Observations in the Weddell Sea, the Antarctic
title_short Assessment of Atmospheric Reanalyses With Independent Observations in the Weddell Sea, the Antarctic
title_full Assessment of Atmospheric Reanalyses With Independent Observations in the Weddell Sea, the Antarctic
title_fullStr Assessment of Atmospheric Reanalyses With Independent Observations in the Weddell Sea, the Antarctic
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of Atmospheric Reanalyses With Independent Observations in the Weddell Sea, the Antarctic
title_sort assessment of atmospheric reanalyses with independent observations in the weddell sea, the antarctic
publisher AGU
publishDate 2020
url https://hdl.handle.net/1956/22943
https://doi.org/10.1029/2019jd030897
long_lat ENVELOPE(12.615,12.615,65.816,65.816)
geographic Antarctic
Merra
The Antarctic
Weddell
Weddell Sea
geographic_facet Antarctic
Merra
The Antarctic
Weddell
Weddell Sea
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
Weddell Sea
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
Weddell Sea
op_source Journal of Geophysical Research (JGR): Space Physics
op_relation urn:issn:2169-9402
urn:issn:2169-9380
https://hdl.handle.net/1956/22943
https://doi.org/10.1029/2019jd030897
cristin:1784077
op_rights Attribution CC BY
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
Copyright 2019 The Author(s)
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1029/2019jd030897
container_title Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
container_volume 124
container_issue 23
container_start_page 12468
op_container_end_page 12484
_version_ 1766251274275127296