Roads to Autonomy. Similar paths, different outcomes in two Inuit regions

The purpose of this study is to analyze and explain why two Inuit regions in Canada, Nunavik and Nunatsiavut, experienced different outcomes after extensive tripartite negotiations for self-government. Although both regions appear to have similar basic features, the Nunavik self-government agreement...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Knapskog, Arild
Format: Master Thesis
Language:English
Published: The University of Bergen 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/1956/17419
id ftunivbergen:oai:bora.uib.no:1956/17419
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivbergen:oai:bora.uib.no:1956/17419 2023-05-15T16:54:58+02:00 Roads to Autonomy. Similar paths, different outcomes in two Inuit regions Knapskog, Arild 2017-12-11T23:00:03Z application/pdf https://hdl.handle.net/1956/17419 eng eng The University of Bergen https://hdl.handle.net/1956/17419 Copyright the author. All rights reserved. Canada case study qualitative research self-government process tracing 731114 Master thesis 2017 ftunivbergen 2023-03-14T17:43:33Z The purpose of this study is to analyze and explain why two Inuit regions in Canada, Nunavik and Nunatsiavut, experienced different outcomes after extensive tripartite negotiations for self-government. Although both regions appear to have similar basic features, the Nunavik self-government agreement failed in a referendum in 2011, while the Nunatsiavut agreement was ratified six years earlier. I present a set of factors that have been known to influence outcomes in self-government negotiations. The factors I consider are the compatibility of government and Aboriginal group goals, minimal use of confrontational tactics, Aboriginal group cohesion and government perceptions of Aboriginal group. I also pay heed to institutional and contextual factors, such as the evolving institutional framework of Canada’s self-government policy and the emergence of multilevel governance structures in Inuit regions. In order to investigate this puzzle, I do a multiple case study and utilize the strategy of process tracing. Using semi-structured interviews, newspaper data, government reports, meeting minutes and scholarly literature I seek to identify the factors that might have contributed to Nunavik and Nunatsiavut’s different outcomes. The findings indicate that the divergent outcomes in the two cases best can be explained by the lack of group cohesion in Nunavik as compared to Nunatsiavut. In addition, I find that the layering of self-government policy and the emergence of a multilevel governance structure in Nunavik affected the self-government negotiation outcome in Nunavik negatively. In contrast to Nunatsiavut where there did not exist any multilevel governance structure, and which was positively impacted by the more extensive self-government policy that emerged over the years. Masteroppgåve SAMPOL350 Master Thesis inuit Nunavik University of Bergen: Bergen Open Research Archive (BORA-UiB) Canada Nunavik
institution Open Polar
collection University of Bergen: Bergen Open Research Archive (BORA-UiB)
op_collection_id ftunivbergen
language English
topic Canada
case study
qualitative research
self-government
process tracing
731114
spellingShingle Canada
case study
qualitative research
self-government
process tracing
731114
Knapskog, Arild
Roads to Autonomy. Similar paths, different outcomes in two Inuit regions
topic_facet Canada
case study
qualitative research
self-government
process tracing
731114
description The purpose of this study is to analyze and explain why two Inuit regions in Canada, Nunavik and Nunatsiavut, experienced different outcomes after extensive tripartite negotiations for self-government. Although both regions appear to have similar basic features, the Nunavik self-government agreement failed in a referendum in 2011, while the Nunatsiavut agreement was ratified six years earlier. I present a set of factors that have been known to influence outcomes in self-government negotiations. The factors I consider are the compatibility of government and Aboriginal group goals, minimal use of confrontational tactics, Aboriginal group cohesion and government perceptions of Aboriginal group. I also pay heed to institutional and contextual factors, such as the evolving institutional framework of Canada’s self-government policy and the emergence of multilevel governance structures in Inuit regions. In order to investigate this puzzle, I do a multiple case study and utilize the strategy of process tracing. Using semi-structured interviews, newspaper data, government reports, meeting minutes and scholarly literature I seek to identify the factors that might have contributed to Nunavik and Nunatsiavut’s different outcomes. The findings indicate that the divergent outcomes in the two cases best can be explained by the lack of group cohesion in Nunavik as compared to Nunatsiavut. In addition, I find that the layering of self-government policy and the emergence of a multilevel governance structure in Nunavik affected the self-government negotiation outcome in Nunavik negatively. In contrast to Nunatsiavut where there did not exist any multilevel governance structure, and which was positively impacted by the more extensive self-government policy that emerged over the years. Masteroppgåve SAMPOL350
format Master Thesis
author Knapskog, Arild
author_facet Knapskog, Arild
author_sort Knapskog, Arild
title Roads to Autonomy. Similar paths, different outcomes in two Inuit regions
title_short Roads to Autonomy. Similar paths, different outcomes in two Inuit regions
title_full Roads to Autonomy. Similar paths, different outcomes in two Inuit regions
title_fullStr Roads to Autonomy. Similar paths, different outcomes in two Inuit regions
title_full_unstemmed Roads to Autonomy. Similar paths, different outcomes in two Inuit regions
title_sort roads to autonomy. similar paths, different outcomes in two inuit regions
publisher The University of Bergen
publishDate 2017
url https://hdl.handle.net/1956/17419
geographic Canada
Nunavik
geographic_facet Canada
Nunavik
genre inuit
Nunavik
genre_facet inuit
Nunavik
op_relation https://hdl.handle.net/1956/17419
op_rights Copyright the author. All rights reserved.
_version_ 1766045912236294144