The effect of photoperiod manipulation on Atlantic salmon growth, smoltification and sexual maturation: A case study of a commercial RAS
The effect of photoperiod manipulation on growth, smoltification and maturation was assessed in Atlantic salmon through an observational study performed in a commercial RAS facility from June (25.0 ± 11.0 g) to October 2018 (151.1 ± 25.5 g). Half of the commercial cohort 721 was raised in continuous...
Published in: | Aquaculture Research |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2021
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2769977 https://doi.org/10.1111/are.15107 |
id |
ftunivbergen:oai:bora.uib.no:11250/2769977 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftunivbergen:oai:bora.uib.no:11250/2769977 2023-05-15T15:31:35+02:00 The effect of photoperiod manipulation on Atlantic salmon growth, smoltification and sexual maturation: A case study of a commercial RAS Pino, Enrique Balseiro Vigo, Pablo Pedrosa, Cindy Haugen, Tilde Fleming, Mitchell Stewart Handeland, Sigurd Olav 2021 application/pdf https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2769977 https://doi.org/10.1111/are.15107 eng eng Wiley urn:issn:1355-557X https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2769977 https://doi.org/10.1111/are.15107 cristin:1885935 Aquaculture Research. 2021, 52 (6), 2593-2608. Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no Copyright 2021 The Authors. Aquaculture Research 2593-2608 52 6 Journal article Peer reviewed 2021 ftunivbergen https://doi.org/10.1111/are.15107 2023-03-14T17:41:09Z The effect of photoperiod manipulation on growth, smoltification and maturation was assessed in Atlantic salmon through an observational study performed in a commercial RAS facility from June (25.0 ± 11.0 g) to October 2018 (151.1 ± 25.5 g). Half of the commercial cohort 721 was raised in continuous light LD24:0 (LL) while the other received a 6-week LD12:12 winter signal (WS) for smoltification from 12 August to 21 September. Parameters related to growth (body weight, gene expression of pituitary gh1 and gh2, and liver ghr1, igf1 and igfbp1a), smoltification (condition factor, plasma sodium and cortisol, gill NKA activity and nka1a, nka1b and nkcc1a expression) and maturation (GSI and pituitary fshb and lhb expression) were analysed. Afterwards, a multivariate analysis was performed on production data from five commercial cohorts raised in the facility (including 721) to identify variables potentially linked to early maturation in RAS. Results from the observational study indicated weak compensatory growth and slightly better smoltification in WS, although signs of size-induced smoltification were present in LL. Smoltification indicators were poor in both treatments, suggesting that smolts may not be yet ready for seawater. No maturation was observed in any photoperiod treatment; however, the multivariate assessment suggested that such lack of maturation might be rather linked to the low mean temperature and SGR experienced by our cohort. publishedVersion Article in Journal/Newspaper Atlantic salmon University of Bergen: Bergen Open Research Archive (BORA-UiB) Aquaculture Research 52 6 2593 2608 |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
University of Bergen: Bergen Open Research Archive (BORA-UiB) |
op_collection_id |
ftunivbergen |
language |
English |
description |
The effect of photoperiod manipulation on growth, smoltification and maturation was assessed in Atlantic salmon through an observational study performed in a commercial RAS facility from June (25.0 ± 11.0 g) to October 2018 (151.1 ± 25.5 g). Half of the commercial cohort 721 was raised in continuous light LD24:0 (LL) while the other received a 6-week LD12:12 winter signal (WS) for smoltification from 12 August to 21 September. Parameters related to growth (body weight, gene expression of pituitary gh1 and gh2, and liver ghr1, igf1 and igfbp1a), smoltification (condition factor, plasma sodium and cortisol, gill NKA activity and nka1a, nka1b and nkcc1a expression) and maturation (GSI and pituitary fshb and lhb expression) were analysed. Afterwards, a multivariate analysis was performed on production data from five commercial cohorts raised in the facility (including 721) to identify variables potentially linked to early maturation in RAS. Results from the observational study indicated weak compensatory growth and slightly better smoltification in WS, although signs of size-induced smoltification were present in LL. Smoltification indicators were poor in both treatments, suggesting that smolts may not be yet ready for seawater. No maturation was observed in any photoperiod treatment; however, the multivariate assessment suggested that such lack of maturation might be rather linked to the low mean temperature and SGR experienced by our cohort. publishedVersion |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Pino, Enrique Balseiro Vigo, Pablo Pedrosa, Cindy Haugen, Tilde Fleming, Mitchell Stewart Handeland, Sigurd Olav |
spellingShingle |
Pino, Enrique Balseiro Vigo, Pablo Pedrosa, Cindy Haugen, Tilde Fleming, Mitchell Stewart Handeland, Sigurd Olav The effect of photoperiod manipulation on Atlantic salmon growth, smoltification and sexual maturation: A case study of a commercial RAS |
author_facet |
Pino, Enrique Balseiro Vigo, Pablo Pedrosa, Cindy Haugen, Tilde Fleming, Mitchell Stewart Handeland, Sigurd Olav |
author_sort |
Pino, Enrique |
title |
The effect of photoperiod manipulation on Atlantic salmon growth, smoltification and sexual maturation: A case study of a commercial RAS |
title_short |
The effect of photoperiod manipulation on Atlantic salmon growth, smoltification and sexual maturation: A case study of a commercial RAS |
title_full |
The effect of photoperiod manipulation on Atlantic salmon growth, smoltification and sexual maturation: A case study of a commercial RAS |
title_fullStr |
The effect of photoperiod manipulation on Atlantic salmon growth, smoltification and sexual maturation: A case study of a commercial RAS |
title_full_unstemmed |
The effect of photoperiod manipulation on Atlantic salmon growth, smoltification and sexual maturation: A case study of a commercial RAS |
title_sort |
effect of photoperiod manipulation on atlantic salmon growth, smoltification and sexual maturation: a case study of a commercial ras |
publisher |
Wiley |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2769977 https://doi.org/10.1111/are.15107 |
genre |
Atlantic salmon |
genre_facet |
Atlantic salmon |
op_source |
Aquaculture Research 2593-2608 52 6 |
op_relation |
urn:issn:1355-557X https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2769977 https://doi.org/10.1111/are.15107 cristin:1885935 Aquaculture Research. 2021, 52 (6), 2593-2608. |
op_rights |
Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no Copyright 2021 The Authors. |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.1111/are.15107 |
container_title |
Aquaculture Research |
container_volume |
52 |
container_issue |
6 |
container_start_page |
2593 |
op_container_end_page |
2608 |
_version_ |
1766362113037565952 |