Meridional Ocean Carbon Transport
The ocean's ability to take up and store CO2 is a key factor for understanding past and future climate variability. However, qualitative and quantitative understanding of surface-to-interior pathways, and how the ocean circulation affects the CO2 uptake, is limited. Consequently, how changes in...
Published in: | Global Biogeochemical Cycles |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
AGU
2020
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2766233 https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GB006336 |
id |
ftunivbergen:oai:bora.uib.no:11250/2766233 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftunivbergen:oai:bora.uib.no:11250/2766233 2023-05-15T13:56:36+02:00 Meridional Ocean Carbon Transport Aldama-Campino, Aitor Fransner, Filippa Ödalen, Malin Groeskamp, Sjoerd Yool, Andrew Döös, Kristofer Nycander, Jonas 2020 application/pdf https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2766233 https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GB006336 eng eng AGU urn:issn:0886-6236 https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2766233 https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GB006336 cristin:1865941 Global Biogeochemical Cycles. 2020, 34(9), e2019GB006336 Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no Copyright 2020 The Authors e2019GB006336 Global Biogeochemical Cycles 34 9 Journal article Peer reviewed 2020 ftunivbergen https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GB006336 2023-03-14T17:40:05Z The ocean's ability to take up and store CO2 is a key factor for understanding past and future climate variability. However, qualitative and quantitative understanding of surface-to-interior pathways, and how the ocean circulation affects the CO2 uptake, is limited. Consequently, how changes in ocean circulation may influence carbon uptake and storage and therefore the future climate remains ambiguous. Here we quantify the roles played by ocean circulation and various water masses in the meridional redistribution of carbon. We do so by calculating streamfunctions defined in dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) and latitude coordinates, using output from a coupled biogeochemical-physical model. By further separating DIC into components originating from the solubility pump and a residual including the biological pump, air-sea disequilibrium, and anthropogenic CO2, we are able to distinguish the dominant pathways of how carbon enters particular water masses. With this new tool, we show that the largest meridional carbon transport occurs in a pole-to-equator transport in the subtropical gyres in the upper ocean. We are able to show that this pole-to-equator DIC transport and the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation (AMOC)-related DIC transport are mainly driven by the solubility pump. By contrast, the DIC transport associated with deep circulation, including that in Antarctic bottom water and Pacific deep water, is mostly driven by the biological pump. As these two pumps, as well as ocean circulation, are widely expected to be impacted by anthropogenic changes, these findings have implications for the future role of the ocean as a climate-buffering carbon reservoir. publishedVersion Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctic University of Bergen: Bergen Open Research Archive (BORA-UiB) Antarctic Pacific Global Biogeochemical Cycles 34 9 |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
University of Bergen: Bergen Open Research Archive (BORA-UiB) |
op_collection_id |
ftunivbergen |
language |
English |
description |
The ocean's ability to take up and store CO2 is a key factor for understanding past and future climate variability. However, qualitative and quantitative understanding of surface-to-interior pathways, and how the ocean circulation affects the CO2 uptake, is limited. Consequently, how changes in ocean circulation may influence carbon uptake and storage and therefore the future climate remains ambiguous. Here we quantify the roles played by ocean circulation and various water masses in the meridional redistribution of carbon. We do so by calculating streamfunctions defined in dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) and latitude coordinates, using output from a coupled biogeochemical-physical model. By further separating DIC into components originating from the solubility pump and a residual including the biological pump, air-sea disequilibrium, and anthropogenic CO2, we are able to distinguish the dominant pathways of how carbon enters particular water masses. With this new tool, we show that the largest meridional carbon transport occurs in a pole-to-equator transport in the subtropical gyres in the upper ocean. We are able to show that this pole-to-equator DIC transport and the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation (AMOC)-related DIC transport are mainly driven by the solubility pump. By contrast, the DIC transport associated with deep circulation, including that in Antarctic bottom water and Pacific deep water, is mostly driven by the biological pump. As these two pumps, as well as ocean circulation, are widely expected to be impacted by anthropogenic changes, these findings have implications for the future role of the ocean as a climate-buffering carbon reservoir. publishedVersion |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Aldama-Campino, Aitor Fransner, Filippa Ödalen, Malin Groeskamp, Sjoerd Yool, Andrew Döös, Kristofer Nycander, Jonas |
spellingShingle |
Aldama-Campino, Aitor Fransner, Filippa Ödalen, Malin Groeskamp, Sjoerd Yool, Andrew Döös, Kristofer Nycander, Jonas Meridional Ocean Carbon Transport |
author_facet |
Aldama-Campino, Aitor Fransner, Filippa Ödalen, Malin Groeskamp, Sjoerd Yool, Andrew Döös, Kristofer Nycander, Jonas |
author_sort |
Aldama-Campino, Aitor |
title |
Meridional Ocean Carbon Transport |
title_short |
Meridional Ocean Carbon Transport |
title_full |
Meridional Ocean Carbon Transport |
title_fullStr |
Meridional Ocean Carbon Transport |
title_full_unstemmed |
Meridional Ocean Carbon Transport |
title_sort |
meridional ocean carbon transport |
publisher |
AGU |
publishDate |
2020 |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2766233 https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GB006336 |
geographic |
Antarctic Pacific |
geographic_facet |
Antarctic Pacific |
genre |
Antarc* Antarctic |
genre_facet |
Antarc* Antarctic |
op_source |
e2019GB006336 Global Biogeochemical Cycles 34 9 |
op_relation |
urn:issn:0886-6236 https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2766233 https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GB006336 cristin:1865941 Global Biogeochemical Cycles. 2020, 34(9), e2019GB006336 |
op_rights |
Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no Copyright 2020 The Authors |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GB006336 |
container_title |
Global Biogeochemical Cycles |
container_volume |
34 |
container_issue |
9 |
_version_ |
1766264152299405312 |