Comparison of wind speed and wave height trends from twentieth-century models and satellite altimeters

The trends in marine 10-m wind speed U10 and significant wave height Hs found in two century-long reanalyses are compared against a model-only integration. Reanalyses show spurious trends due to the assimilation of an increasing number of observations over time. The comparisons between model and rea...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Climate
Main Authors: Meucci, Alberto, Young, Ian R., Aarnes, Ole Johan, Breivik, Øyvind
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: American Meteorological Society 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2761403
https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0540.1
id ftunivbergen:oai:bora.uib.no:11250/2761403
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivbergen:oai:bora.uib.no:11250/2761403 2023-05-15T17:33:26+02:00 Comparison of wind speed and wave height trends from twentieth-century models and satellite altimeters Meucci, Alberto Young, Ian R. Aarnes, Ole Johan Breivik, Øyvind 2020 application/pdf https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2761403 https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0540.1 eng eng American Meteorological Society Norges forskningsråd: 256466 EC/H2020/JPI Cliamte ERA4CS WINDSURFER urn:issn:0894-8755 https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2761403 https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0540.1 cristin:1819876 Journal of Climate. 2020, 33 (2), 611–624. Copyright 2019 American Meteorological Society Journal of Climate 33 2 611-624 Journal article Peer reviewed 2020 ftunivbergen https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0540.1 2023-03-14T17:41:28Z The trends in marine 10-m wind speed U10 and significant wave height Hs found in two century-long reanalyses are compared against a model-only integration. Reanalyses show spurious trends due to the assimilation of an increasing number of observations over time. The comparisons between model and reanalyses show that the areas where the discrepancies in U10 and Hs trends are greatest are also the areas where there is a marked increase in assimilated observations. Large differences in the yearly averages call into question the quality of the observations assimilated by the reanalyses, resulting in unreliable U10 and Hs trends before the 1950s. Four main regions of the world’s oceans are identified where the trends between model and reanalyses deviate strongly. These are the North Atlantic, the North Pacific, the Tasman Sea, and the western South Atlantic. The trends at +24-h lead time are markedly weaker and less correlated with the observation count. A 1985–2010 comparison with an extensive dataset of calibrated satellite altimeters shows contrasting results in Hs trends but similar U10 spatial trend distributions, with general agreement between model, reanalyses, and satellite altimeters on a broad increase in wind speed over the Southern Hemisphere. publishedVersion Article in Journal/Newspaper North Atlantic University of Bergen: Bergen Open Research Archive (BORA-UiB) Pacific Journal of Climate 33 2 611 624
institution Open Polar
collection University of Bergen: Bergen Open Research Archive (BORA-UiB)
op_collection_id ftunivbergen
language English
description The trends in marine 10-m wind speed U10 and significant wave height Hs found in two century-long reanalyses are compared against a model-only integration. Reanalyses show spurious trends due to the assimilation of an increasing number of observations over time. The comparisons between model and reanalyses show that the areas where the discrepancies in U10 and Hs trends are greatest are also the areas where there is a marked increase in assimilated observations. Large differences in the yearly averages call into question the quality of the observations assimilated by the reanalyses, resulting in unreliable U10 and Hs trends before the 1950s. Four main regions of the world’s oceans are identified where the trends between model and reanalyses deviate strongly. These are the North Atlantic, the North Pacific, the Tasman Sea, and the western South Atlantic. The trends at +24-h lead time are markedly weaker and less correlated with the observation count. A 1985–2010 comparison with an extensive dataset of calibrated satellite altimeters shows contrasting results in Hs trends but similar U10 spatial trend distributions, with general agreement between model, reanalyses, and satellite altimeters on a broad increase in wind speed over the Southern Hemisphere. publishedVersion
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Meucci, Alberto
Young, Ian R.
Aarnes, Ole Johan
Breivik, Øyvind
spellingShingle Meucci, Alberto
Young, Ian R.
Aarnes, Ole Johan
Breivik, Øyvind
Comparison of wind speed and wave height trends from twentieth-century models and satellite altimeters
author_facet Meucci, Alberto
Young, Ian R.
Aarnes, Ole Johan
Breivik, Øyvind
author_sort Meucci, Alberto
title Comparison of wind speed and wave height trends from twentieth-century models and satellite altimeters
title_short Comparison of wind speed and wave height trends from twentieth-century models and satellite altimeters
title_full Comparison of wind speed and wave height trends from twentieth-century models and satellite altimeters
title_fullStr Comparison of wind speed and wave height trends from twentieth-century models and satellite altimeters
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of wind speed and wave height trends from twentieth-century models and satellite altimeters
title_sort comparison of wind speed and wave height trends from twentieth-century models and satellite altimeters
publisher American Meteorological Society
publishDate 2020
url https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2761403
https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0540.1
geographic Pacific
geographic_facet Pacific
genre North Atlantic
genre_facet North Atlantic
op_source Journal of Climate
33
2
611-624
op_relation Norges forskningsråd: 256466
EC/H2020/JPI Cliamte ERA4CS WINDSURFER
urn:issn:0894-8755
https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2761403
https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0540.1
cristin:1819876
Journal of Climate. 2020, 33 (2), 611–624.
op_rights Copyright 2019 American Meteorological Society
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0540.1
container_title Journal of Climate
container_volume 33
container_issue 2
container_start_page 611
op_container_end_page 624
_version_ 1766131932815425536