Long-Term Statistics of Observed Bubble Depth Versus Modeled Wave Dissipation

Air bubble penetration depths are investigated with a bottom‐mounted echosounder at a seabed observatory in northern Norway. We compare a 1‐year time series of observed bubble depth against modeled and estimated turbulent kinetic energy flux from breaking waves as well as wind speed and sea state. W...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans
Main Authors: Strand, Kjersti Opstad, Breivik, Øyvind, Pedersen, Geir, Vikebø, Frode Bendiksen, Sundby, Svein, Christensen, Kai Håkon
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2734627
https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JC015906
id ftunivbergen:oai:bora.uib.no:11250/2734627
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivbergen:oai:bora.uib.no:11250/2734627 2023-05-15T17:43:28+02:00 Long-Term Statistics of Observed Bubble Depth Versus Modeled Wave Dissipation Strand, Kjersti Opstad Breivik, Øyvind Pedersen, Geir Vikebø, Frode Bendiksen Sundby, Svein Christensen, Kai Håkon 2020 application/pdf https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2734627 https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JC015906 eng eng Wiley SIVA: 237906 Norges forskningsråd: 244262 urn:issn:2169-9380 https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2734627 https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JC015906 cristin:1819881 Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics. 2020, 125 (2), e2019JC015906. Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no Copyright 2020. The Authors. e2019JC015906 Journal of Geophysical Research (JGR): Space Physics 125 2 Journal article Peer reviewed 2020 ftunivbergen https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JC015906 2023-03-14T17:38:55Z Air bubble penetration depths are investigated with a bottom‐mounted echosounder at a seabed observatory in northern Norway. We compare a 1‐year time series of observed bubble depth against modeled and estimated turbulent kinetic energy flux from breaking waves as well as wind speed and sea state. We find that the hourly mean and maximum bubble depths are highly variable, reaching 18 and 38 m, respectively, and strongly correlated with wind and sea state. The bubble depth is shallowest during summer following the seasonal variations in wind speed and wave height. Summertime shallowing of the mixed layer depth is not limiting the penetration depth. A strong relationship between bubble depth and modeled turbulent kinetic energy flux from breaking waves is found, similar in strength to the relationship between bubble depth and wind speed. The wind sea is more strongly correlated with bubble depth than the total significant wave height, and the swell is only weakly correlated, suggesting that the wave model does a reasonable separation of swell and wind sea. publishedVersion Article in Journal/Newspaper Northern Norway University of Bergen: Bergen Open Research Archive (BORA-UiB) Norway Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans 125 2
institution Open Polar
collection University of Bergen: Bergen Open Research Archive (BORA-UiB)
op_collection_id ftunivbergen
language English
description Air bubble penetration depths are investigated with a bottom‐mounted echosounder at a seabed observatory in northern Norway. We compare a 1‐year time series of observed bubble depth against modeled and estimated turbulent kinetic energy flux from breaking waves as well as wind speed and sea state. We find that the hourly mean and maximum bubble depths are highly variable, reaching 18 and 38 m, respectively, and strongly correlated with wind and sea state. The bubble depth is shallowest during summer following the seasonal variations in wind speed and wave height. Summertime shallowing of the mixed layer depth is not limiting the penetration depth. A strong relationship between bubble depth and modeled turbulent kinetic energy flux from breaking waves is found, similar in strength to the relationship between bubble depth and wind speed. The wind sea is more strongly correlated with bubble depth than the total significant wave height, and the swell is only weakly correlated, suggesting that the wave model does a reasonable separation of swell and wind sea. publishedVersion
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Strand, Kjersti Opstad
Breivik, Øyvind
Pedersen, Geir
Vikebø, Frode Bendiksen
Sundby, Svein
Christensen, Kai Håkon
spellingShingle Strand, Kjersti Opstad
Breivik, Øyvind
Pedersen, Geir
Vikebø, Frode Bendiksen
Sundby, Svein
Christensen, Kai Håkon
Long-Term Statistics of Observed Bubble Depth Versus Modeled Wave Dissipation
author_facet Strand, Kjersti Opstad
Breivik, Øyvind
Pedersen, Geir
Vikebø, Frode Bendiksen
Sundby, Svein
Christensen, Kai Håkon
author_sort Strand, Kjersti Opstad
title Long-Term Statistics of Observed Bubble Depth Versus Modeled Wave Dissipation
title_short Long-Term Statistics of Observed Bubble Depth Versus Modeled Wave Dissipation
title_full Long-Term Statistics of Observed Bubble Depth Versus Modeled Wave Dissipation
title_fullStr Long-Term Statistics of Observed Bubble Depth Versus Modeled Wave Dissipation
title_full_unstemmed Long-Term Statistics of Observed Bubble Depth Versus Modeled Wave Dissipation
title_sort long-term statistics of observed bubble depth versus modeled wave dissipation
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2020
url https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2734627
https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JC015906
geographic Norway
geographic_facet Norway
genre Northern Norway
genre_facet Northern Norway
op_source e2019JC015906
Journal of Geophysical Research (JGR): Space Physics
125
2
op_relation SIVA: 237906
Norges forskningsråd: 244262
urn:issn:2169-9380
https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2734627
https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JC015906
cristin:1819881
Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics. 2020, 125 (2), e2019JC015906.
op_rights Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no
Copyright 2020. The Authors.
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JC015906
container_title Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans
container_volume 125
container_issue 2
_version_ 1766145540032036864