Il ricorso per annullamento ed i limiti alla tutela dei ricorrenti non privilegiati
The Annulment Proceeding and the Limits to the Protection of Individuals’ Right The essay focuses on the Locus Standi of Private Applicants under Article 263.4 TFEU and the limit to the Principle of Judicial Protection in the European Union system. In particular it highlights that notwithstanding th...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | Italian |
Published: |
2013
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/11586/66041 |
id |
ftunivbari:oai:ricerca.uniba.it:11586/66041 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftunivbari:oai:ricerca.uniba.it:11586/66041 2024-01-28T10:06:51+01:00 Il ricorso per annullamento ed i limiti alla tutela dei ricorrenti non privilegiati ROMITO, Angela Maria Romito, Angela Maria 2013 http://hdl.handle.net/11586/66041 ita ita volume:VIII issue:3 firstpage:525 lastpage:544 numberofpages:20 journal:STUDI SULL'INTEGRAZIONE EUROPEA http://hdl.handle.net/11586/66041 info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess UNIONE EUROPEA tutela giurisdizionale ricorso alla Corte di giustizia info:eu-repo/semantics/article 2013 ftunivbari 2024-01-03T17:45:00Z The Annulment Proceeding and the Limits to the Protection of Individuals’ Right The essay focuses on the Locus Standi of Private Applicants under Article 263.4 TFEU and the limit to the Principle of Judicial Protection in the European Union system. In particular it highlights that notwithstanding the new formula of the norm of the Treaty, which introduces new rules of standing for private parties concerning “regulatory acts not entailing implementing measures”, there are still some grey areas in the protection of private parties under the annulment proceeding. After the analysis of the previous Article 230.3 TEC, and the position of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) which has refused to relax its approach to standing on various occasions, despite strong criticism from many quarters, the paper describes the origin and the reasons that leads the drafters of the Treaty of Lisbon to revise the article relating to the standing of private parties adding a third category to the existing two (addressee, party directly and individually concerned): a natural or legal person may challenge “a regulatory act which is of direct concern to them and does not entail implementing measures”. Due to the lack of definitions, the effect that the revision has on applicants depends on the judicial interpretation of the provision. The notion of these acts had raised doubts until the General Court has given a definition in case Inuit in October 2013. Before the judgment of ECJ the EU Tribunal in cases Inuit and Microban defined the “regulatory acts” as general non-legislative acts on the basis of a formal point of view. The ECJ had a chance to adopt in the appeal in Inuit a more extensive approach, but it did not. The issue raised a great debate among scholars too, dividing them between those who advocate a wider definition of “regulatory acts”, and the ones who support the ECJ interpretation. This essay will present criticisms of the latest definition set out by the ECJ and the overall effect of the new version of Article 263.4 TFEU ... Article in Journal/Newspaper inuit Università degli Studi di Bari Aldo Moro: CINECA IRIS |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Università degli Studi di Bari Aldo Moro: CINECA IRIS |
op_collection_id |
ftunivbari |
language |
Italian |
topic |
UNIONE EUROPEA tutela giurisdizionale ricorso alla Corte di giustizia |
spellingShingle |
UNIONE EUROPEA tutela giurisdizionale ricorso alla Corte di giustizia ROMITO, Angela Maria Il ricorso per annullamento ed i limiti alla tutela dei ricorrenti non privilegiati |
topic_facet |
UNIONE EUROPEA tutela giurisdizionale ricorso alla Corte di giustizia |
description |
The Annulment Proceeding and the Limits to the Protection of Individuals’ Right The essay focuses on the Locus Standi of Private Applicants under Article 263.4 TFEU and the limit to the Principle of Judicial Protection in the European Union system. In particular it highlights that notwithstanding the new formula of the norm of the Treaty, which introduces new rules of standing for private parties concerning “regulatory acts not entailing implementing measures”, there are still some grey areas in the protection of private parties under the annulment proceeding. After the analysis of the previous Article 230.3 TEC, and the position of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) which has refused to relax its approach to standing on various occasions, despite strong criticism from many quarters, the paper describes the origin and the reasons that leads the drafters of the Treaty of Lisbon to revise the article relating to the standing of private parties adding a third category to the existing two (addressee, party directly and individually concerned): a natural or legal person may challenge “a regulatory act which is of direct concern to them and does not entail implementing measures”. Due to the lack of definitions, the effect that the revision has on applicants depends on the judicial interpretation of the provision. The notion of these acts had raised doubts until the General Court has given a definition in case Inuit in October 2013. Before the judgment of ECJ the EU Tribunal in cases Inuit and Microban defined the “regulatory acts” as general non-legislative acts on the basis of a formal point of view. The ECJ had a chance to adopt in the appeal in Inuit a more extensive approach, but it did not. The issue raised a great debate among scholars too, dividing them between those who advocate a wider definition of “regulatory acts”, and the ones who support the ECJ interpretation. This essay will present criticisms of the latest definition set out by the ECJ and the overall effect of the new version of Article 263.4 TFEU ... |
author2 |
Romito, Angela Maria |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
ROMITO, Angela Maria |
author_facet |
ROMITO, Angela Maria |
author_sort |
ROMITO, Angela Maria |
title |
Il ricorso per annullamento ed i limiti alla tutela dei ricorrenti non privilegiati |
title_short |
Il ricorso per annullamento ed i limiti alla tutela dei ricorrenti non privilegiati |
title_full |
Il ricorso per annullamento ed i limiti alla tutela dei ricorrenti non privilegiati |
title_fullStr |
Il ricorso per annullamento ed i limiti alla tutela dei ricorrenti non privilegiati |
title_full_unstemmed |
Il ricorso per annullamento ed i limiti alla tutela dei ricorrenti non privilegiati |
title_sort |
il ricorso per annullamento ed i limiti alla tutela dei ricorrenti non privilegiati |
publishDate |
2013 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11586/66041 |
genre |
inuit |
genre_facet |
inuit |
op_relation |
volume:VIII issue:3 firstpage:525 lastpage:544 numberofpages:20 journal:STUDI SULL'INTEGRAZIONE EUROPEA http://hdl.handle.net/11586/66041 |
op_rights |
info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess |
_version_ |
1789334023564165120 |