Mass-diameter regressions for moose browse on the Copper River Delta, Alaska.

Regression equations were developed to predict 3 mass components of 7 browse species important to moose (Alces gigas) on the Copper River Delta in southcentral Alaska. The accuracy of model predictions was the criterion for model selection. Model accuracy was evaluated using data splitting or jackkn...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: MacCracken, J.G., Van Ballenberghe, V.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Rangeland Ecology & Management / Journal of Range Management Archives 1993
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.uair.arizona.edu/index.php/jrm/article/view/8842
id ftunivarizonaojs:oai:journals.uair.arizona.edu:article/8842
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivarizonaojs:oai:journals.uair.arizona.edu:article/8842 2023-05-15T13:13:24+02:00 Mass-diameter regressions for moose browse on the Copper River Delta, Alaska. MacCracken, J.G. Van Ballenberghe, V. 1993-07-01 application/pdf https://journals.uair.arizona.edu/index.php/jrm/article/view/8842 eng eng Rangeland Ecology & Management / Journal of Range Management Archives https://journals.uair.arizona.edu/index.php/jrm/article/view/8842/8454 https://journals.uair.arizona.edu/index.php/jrm/article/view/8842 Rangeland Ecology & Management / Journal of Range Management Archives; Vol 46, No 4 (July 1993); 302-308 1550-7424 0022-409X mass;Alces alces;leaves;stems;browse plants;Alaska;regression analysis;botanical composition info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion 1993 ftunivarizonaojs 2020-11-14T16:32:52Z Regression equations were developed to predict 3 mass components of 7 browse species important to moose (Alces gigas) on the Copper River Delta in southcentral Alaska. The accuracy of model predictions was the criterion for model selection. Model accuracy was evaluated using data splitting or jackknife procedures. Annual production of twigs and leaves and available twig mass on a stem were most accurately predicted from stem basal diameter with zero intercept models, zero intercept log-linear models, or log-log models. Twig mass eaten by moose was most accurately predicted from the diameter at the point of browsing of a twig with zero intercept or full linear models. Heteroskedasticity was significant (P < 0.05) in most of the data sets and could not be significantly reduced with log transformations or use of weighted least squares models. Heteroskedasticity appeared to have a relatively minor effect on model predictions. Most of the models gave mean predictions within +/- 20% of the actual values, particularly for the most ubiquitous species that were also the most important to moose. For each species, there were few differences (P < 0.05) in model coefficients between years and among habitat types. Differences in coefficient estimates appeared to be related to differences in stem morphology that were related to both site conditions and past browsing by moose. Article in Journal/Newspaper Alces alces Alaska Journals at the University of Arizona
institution Open Polar
collection Journals at the University of Arizona
op_collection_id ftunivarizonaojs
language English
topic mass;Alces alces;leaves;stems;browse plants;Alaska;regression analysis;botanical composition
spellingShingle mass;Alces alces;leaves;stems;browse plants;Alaska;regression analysis;botanical composition
MacCracken, J.G.
Van Ballenberghe, V.
Mass-diameter regressions for moose browse on the Copper River Delta, Alaska.
topic_facet mass;Alces alces;leaves;stems;browse plants;Alaska;regression analysis;botanical composition
description Regression equations were developed to predict 3 mass components of 7 browse species important to moose (Alces gigas) on the Copper River Delta in southcentral Alaska. The accuracy of model predictions was the criterion for model selection. Model accuracy was evaluated using data splitting or jackknife procedures. Annual production of twigs and leaves and available twig mass on a stem were most accurately predicted from stem basal diameter with zero intercept models, zero intercept log-linear models, or log-log models. Twig mass eaten by moose was most accurately predicted from the diameter at the point of browsing of a twig with zero intercept or full linear models. Heteroskedasticity was significant (P < 0.05) in most of the data sets and could not be significantly reduced with log transformations or use of weighted least squares models. Heteroskedasticity appeared to have a relatively minor effect on model predictions. Most of the models gave mean predictions within +/- 20% of the actual values, particularly for the most ubiquitous species that were also the most important to moose. For each species, there were few differences (P < 0.05) in model coefficients between years and among habitat types. Differences in coefficient estimates appeared to be related to differences in stem morphology that were related to both site conditions and past browsing by moose.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author MacCracken, J.G.
Van Ballenberghe, V.
author_facet MacCracken, J.G.
Van Ballenberghe, V.
author_sort MacCracken, J.G.
title Mass-diameter regressions for moose browse on the Copper River Delta, Alaska.
title_short Mass-diameter regressions for moose browse on the Copper River Delta, Alaska.
title_full Mass-diameter regressions for moose browse on the Copper River Delta, Alaska.
title_fullStr Mass-diameter regressions for moose browse on the Copper River Delta, Alaska.
title_full_unstemmed Mass-diameter regressions for moose browse on the Copper River Delta, Alaska.
title_sort mass-diameter regressions for moose browse on the copper river delta, alaska.
publisher Rangeland Ecology & Management / Journal of Range Management Archives
publishDate 1993
url https://journals.uair.arizona.edu/index.php/jrm/article/view/8842
genre Alces alces
Alaska
genre_facet Alces alces
Alaska
op_source Rangeland Ecology & Management / Journal of Range Management Archives; Vol 46, No 4 (July 1993); 302-308
1550-7424
0022-409X
op_relation https://journals.uair.arizona.edu/index.php/jrm/article/view/8842/8454
https://journals.uair.arizona.edu/index.php/jrm/article/view/8842
_version_ 1766258104340578304