Contested extractivism: impact assessment, public engagement, and environmental knowledge production in Alaska's Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta

For large extractive mineral projects, Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) processes function in part as a procedural tool to adjudicate the legitimacy of divergent environmental truth claims. Successful anti-extraction movements work to litigate divergent knowledge claims in the public arena, but...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Political Ecology
Main Authors: Tollefson, Jonathan, Panikkar, Bindu
Other Authors: National Science Foundation Award #1642226
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: University of Arizona 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.uair.arizona.edu/index.php/JPE/article/view/23828
https://doi.org/10.2458/v27i1.23828
id ftunivarizonaojs:oai:journals.uair.arizona.edu:article/23828
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivarizonaojs:oai:journals.uair.arizona.edu:article/23828 2023-05-15T17:05:40+02:00 Contested extractivism: impact assessment, public engagement, and environmental knowledge production in Alaska's Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta Tollefson, Jonathan Panikkar, Bindu National Science Foundation Award #1642226 2020-12-30 application/pdf https://journals.uair.arizona.edu/index.php/JPE/article/view/23828 https://doi.org/10.2458/v27i1.23828 eng eng University of Arizona https://journals.uair.arizona.edu/index.php/JPE/article/view/23828/22507 https://journals.uair.arizona.edu/index.php/JPE/article/downloadSuppFile/23828/788 https://journals.uair.arizona.edu/index.php/JPE/article/view/23828 doi:10.2458/v27i1.23828 Copyright (c) 2020 Jonathan Tollefson, Bindu Panikkar http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 CC-BY Journal of Political Ecology; Vol 27, No 1 (2020); 1166-1188 1073-0451 10.2458/jpe.v27i1 Human Geography Social Science Environmental Policy Environmental Justice Natural Resource Management info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Peer-reviewed Article 2020 ftunivarizonaojs https://doi.org/10.2458/v27i1.23828 https://doi.org/10.2458/jpe.v27i1 2021-02-22T09:20:19Z For large extractive mineral projects, Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) processes function in part as a procedural tool to adjudicate the legitimacy of divergent environmental truth claims. Successful anti-extraction movements work to litigate divergent knowledge claims in the public arena, but few anti-extraction communities have access to a broad public audience. This article examines the proposed Donlin Gold mine in southwestern Alaska, a locally divisive yet publicly invisible extraction controversy, to understand how communities contest the boundaries of knowledge production and legitimacy set out by EIS procedures without the benefit of broad public awareness. Through a multi-method analysis of the public engagement segment of Donlin's Draft EIS, we find that anti-Donlin activists worked to construct environmental knowledge that drew jointly on claims to local knowledge and scientific expertise through a temporary assemblage of local activists and external consultants. The contested epistemic understandings of residents, expert consultants, and state and federal regulators further reveal the role of regulatory processes in constructing and maintaining boundaries of epistemic legitimacy, while also pointing to emergent possibilities for social action based in locally-situated environmental truth claims.Key Words: Environmental Impact Statement, mining, truth claims, Donlin Gold mine, Alaska Article in Journal/Newspaper Kuskokwim Alaska Yukon Journals at the University of Arizona Yukon Journal of Political Ecology 27 1
institution Open Polar
collection Journals at the University of Arizona
op_collection_id ftunivarizonaojs
language English
topic Human Geography
Social Science
Environmental Policy
Environmental Justice
Natural Resource Management
spellingShingle Human Geography
Social Science
Environmental Policy
Environmental Justice
Natural Resource Management
Tollefson, Jonathan
Panikkar, Bindu
Contested extractivism: impact assessment, public engagement, and environmental knowledge production in Alaska's Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta
topic_facet Human Geography
Social Science
Environmental Policy
Environmental Justice
Natural Resource Management
description For large extractive mineral projects, Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) processes function in part as a procedural tool to adjudicate the legitimacy of divergent environmental truth claims. Successful anti-extraction movements work to litigate divergent knowledge claims in the public arena, but few anti-extraction communities have access to a broad public audience. This article examines the proposed Donlin Gold mine in southwestern Alaska, a locally divisive yet publicly invisible extraction controversy, to understand how communities contest the boundaries of knowledge production and legitimacy set out by EIS procedures without the benefit of broad public awareness. Through a multi-method analysis of the public engagement segment of Donlin's Draft EIS, we find that anti-Donlin activists worked to construct environmental knowledge that drew jointly on claims to local knowledge and scientific expertise through a temporary assemblage of local activists and external consultants. The contested epistemic understandings of residents, expert consultants, and state and federal regulators further reveal the role of regulatory processes in constructing and maintaining boundaries of epistemic legitimacy, while also pointing to emergent possibilities for social action based in locally-situated environmental truth claims.Key Words: Environmental Impact Statement, mining, truth claims, Donlin Gold mine, Alaska
author2 National Science Foundation Award #1642226
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Tollefson, Jonathan
Panikkar, Bindu
author_facet Tollefson, Jonathan
Panikkar, Bindu
author_sort Tollefson, Jonathan
title Contested extractivism: impact assessment, public engagement, and environmental knowledge production in Alaska's Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta
title_short Contested extractivism: impact assessment, public engagement, and environmental knowledge production in Alaska's Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta
title_full Contested extractivism: impact assessment, public engagement, and environmental knowledge production in Alaska's Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta
title_fullStr Contested extractivism: impact assessment, public engagement, and environmental knowledge production in Alaska's Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta
title_full_unstemmed Contested extractivism: impact assessment, public engagement, and environmental knowledge production in Alaska's Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta
title_sort contested extractivism: impact assessment, public engagement, and environmental knowledge production in alaska's yukon-kuskokwim delta
publisher University of Arizona
publishDate 2020
url https://journals.uair.arizona.edu/index.php/JPE/article/view/23828
https://doi.org/10.2458/v27i1.23828
geographic Yukon
geographic_facet Yukon
genre Kuskokwim
Alaska
Yukon
genre_facet Kuskokwim
Alaska
Yukon
op_source Journal of Political Ecology; Vol 27, No 1 (2020); 1166-1188
1073-0451
10.2458/jpe.v27i1
op_relation https://journals.uair.arizona.edu/index.php/JPE/article/view/23828/22507
https://journals.uair.arizona.edu/index.php/JPE/article/downloadSuppFile/23828/788
https://journals.uair.arizona.edu/index.php/JPE/article/view/23828
doi:10.2458/v27i1.23828
op_rights Copyright (c) 2020 Jonathan Tollefson, Bindu Panikkar
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
op_rightsnorm CC-BY
op_doi https://doi.org/10.2458/v27i1.23828
https://doi.org/10.2458/jpe.v27i1
container_title Journal of Political Ecology
container_volume 27
container_issue 1
_version_ 1766060355511910400