Assessing animal welfare impact of fourteen control and dispatch methods for house mouse (Mus musculus), Norway rat (Rattus norvegicus) and black rat (Rattus rattus)

Abstract: Population control of the house mouse (Mus musculus), Norway rat (Rattus norvegicus) and black rat (Rattus rattus) is common practice worldwide. Our objective was to assess the impact on animal welfare of lethal and non-lethal control methods, including three dispatch methods. We used the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Animal Welfare
Main Authors: De Ruyver, Ciska, Baert, Kristof, Cartuyvels, Emma, Beernaert, Lies A.L., Tuyttens, Frank A.M., Leirs, Herwig, Moons, Christel P.H.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10067/1983460151162165141
https://repository.uantwerpen.be/docstore/d:irua:18877
id ftunivantwerpen:c:irua:198346
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivantwerpen:c:irua:198346 2024-05-19T07:47:43+00:00 Assessing animal welfare impact of fourteen control and dispatch methods for house mouse (Mus musculus), Norway rat (Rattus norvegicus) and black rat (Rattus rattus) De Ruyver, Ciska Baert, Kristof Cartuyvels, Emma Beernaert, Lies A.L. Tuyttens, Frank A.M. Leirs, Herwig Moons, Christel P.H. 2023 https://hdl.handle.net/10067/1983460151162165141 https://repository.uantwerpen.be/docstore/d:irua:18877 eng eng info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1017/AWF.2022.2 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/isi/001039413800002 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess 0962-7286 Animal welfare Biology Veterinary medicine info:eu-repo/semantics/article 2023 ftunivantwerpen https://doi.org/10.1017/AWF.2022.2 2024-05-01T00:01:05Z Abstract: Population control of the house mouse (Mus musculus), Norway rat (Rattus norvegicus) and black rat (Rattus rattus) is common practice worldwide. Our objective was to assess the impact on animal welfare of lethal and non-lethal control methods, including three dispatch methods. We used the Sharp and Saunders welfare assessment model with eight experts scoring eleven control methods and three dispatch methods used on the three species. We presumed the methods were performed as prescribed, only taking into account the effect on the target animal (and not, for example, on non-target catches). We did not assess population control efficacy of the methods. Methods considered to induce the least suffering to the target animal were captive-bolt traps, electrocution traps and cervical dislocation, while those with the greatest impact were anticoagulants, cholecalciferol and deprivation. Experts indicated considerable uncertainty regarding their evaluation of certain methods, which emphasises the need for further scientific research. In particular, the impact of hydrogen cyanide, chloralose and aluminium phosphide on animal welfare ought to be investigated. The experts also stressed the need to improve Standard Operating Procedures and to incorporate animal welfare assessments in Integrated Pest Management (IPM). The results of our study can help laypeople, professionals, regulatory agencies and legislators making well-informed decisions as to which methods to use when controlling commensal rodents. Article in Journal/Newspaper Rattus rattus IRUA - Institutional Repository van de Universiteit Antwerpen Animal Welfare 32
institution Open Polar
collection IRUA - Institutional Repository van de Universiteit Antwerpen
op_collection_id ftunivantwerpen
language English
topic Biology
Veterinary medicine
spellingShingle Biology
Veterinary medicine
De Ruyver, Ciska
Baert, Kristof
Cartuyvels, Emma
Beernaert, Lies A.L.
Tuyttens, Frank A.M.
Leirs, Herwig
Moons, Christel P.H.
Assessing animal welfare impact of fourteen control and dispatch methods for house mouse (Mus musculus), Norway rat (Rattus norvegicus) and black rat (Rattus rattus)
topic_facet Biology
Veterinary medicine
description Abstract: Population control of the house mouse (Mus musculus), Norway rat (Rattus norvegicus) and black rat (Rattus rattus) is common practice worldwide. Our objective was to assess the impact on animal welfare of lethal and non-lethal control methods, including three dispatch methods. We used the Sharp and Saunders welfare assessment model with eight experts scoring eleven control methods and three dispatch methods used on the three species. We presumed the methods were performed as prescribed, only taking into account the effect on the target animal (and not, for example, on non-target catches). We did not assess population control efficacy of the methods. Methods considered to induce the least suffering to the target animal were captive-bolt traps, electrocution traps and cervical dislocation, while those with the greatest impact were anticoagulants, cholecalciferol and deprivation. Experts indicated considerable uncertainty regarding their evaluation of certain methods, which emphasises the need for further scientific research. In particular, the impact of hydrogen cyanide, chloralose and aluminium phosphide on animal welfare ought to be investigated. The experts also stressed the need to improve Standard Operating Procedures and to incorporate animal welfare assessments in Integrated Pest Management (IPM). The results of our study can help laypeople, professionals, regulatory agencies and legislators making well-informed decisions as to which methods to use when controlling commensal rodents.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author De Ruyver, Ciska
Baert, Kristof
Cartuyvels, Emma
Beernaert, Lies A.L.
Tuyttens, Frank A.M.
Leirs, Herwig
Moons, Christel P.H.
author_facet De Ruyver, Ciska
Baert, Kristof
Cartuyvels, Emma
Beernaert, Lies A.L.
Tuyttens, Frank A.M.
Leirs, Herwig
Moons, Christel P.H.
author_sort De Ruyver, Ciska
title Assessing animal welfare impact of fourteen control and dispatch methods for house mouse (Mus musculus), Norway rat (Rattus norvegicus) and black rat (Rattus rattus)
title_short Assessing animal welfare impact of fourteen control and dispatch methods for house mouse (Mus musculus), Norway rat (Rattus norvegicus) and black rat (Rattus rattus)
title_full Assessing animal welfare impact of fourteen control and dispatch methods for house mouse (Mus musculus), Norway rat (Rattus norvegicus) and black rat (Rattus rattus)
title_fullStr Assessing animal welfare impact of fourteen control and dispatch methods for house mouse (Mus musculus), Norway rat (Rattus norvegicus) and black rat (Rattus rattus)
title_full_unstemmed Assessing animal welfare impact of fourteen control and dispatch methods for house mouse (Mus musculus), Norway rat (Rattus norvegicus) and black rat (Rattus rattus)
title_sort assessing animal welfare impact of fourteen control and dispatch methods for house mouse (mus musculus), norway rat (rattus norvegicus) and black rat (rattus rattus)
publishDate 2023
url https://hdl.handle.net/10067/1983460151162165141
https://repository.uantwerpen.be/docstore/d:irua:18877
genre Rattus rattus
genre_facet Rattus rattus
op_source 0962-7286
Animal welfare
op_relation info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1017/AWF.2022.2
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/isi/001039413800002
op_rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1017/AWF.2022.2
container_title Animal Welfare
container_volume 32
_version_ 1799488181122367488