Plant community type and small-scale disturbances, but not altitude, influence the invasibility in subarctic ecosystems

Abstract: Little of our knowledge about invasibility comes from arctic and alpine ecosystems, despite increasing plant migration and invasion in those regions. Here, we examine how community type, altitude, and small-scale disturbances affect invasibility in a subarctic ecosystem. Over a period of 4...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:New Phytologist
Main Authors: Milbau, Ann, Shevtsova, Anna, Osler, Nora, Mooshammer, Maria, Graae, Bente J.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10067/1100830151162165141
id ftunivantwerpen:c:irua:110083
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivantwerpen:c:irua:110083 2023-07-16T03:56:58+02:00 Plant community type and small-scale disturbances, but not altitude, influence the invasibility in subarctic ecosystems Milbau, Ann Shevtsova, Anna Osler, Nora Mooshammer, Maria Graae, Bente J. 2013 https://hdl.handle.net/10067/1100830151162165141 eng eng info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1111/NPH.12054 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/isi/000313266000032 info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess 0028-646X New phytologist Biology info:eu-repo/semantics/article 2013 ftunivantwerpen https://doi.org/10.1111/NPH.12054 2023-06-26T22:16:53Z Abstract: Little of our knowledge about invasibility comes from arctic and alpine ecosystems, despite increasing plant migration and invasion in those regions. Here, we examine how community type, altitude, and small-scale disturbances affect invasibility in a subarctic ecosystem. Over a period of 4 yr, we studied seedling emergence and establishment in 17 species sown in gaps or undisturbed vegetation in four subarctic community types (Salix scrub, meadow, rich heath, poor heath) along an elevation gradient. Invasibility was lowest in rich heath and highest in Salix scrub. Small disturbances significantly increased the invasibility in most communities, thereby showing the importance of biotic resistance to invasion in subarctic regions. Unexpectedly, invasibility did not decrease with increasing elevation, and it was also not related to summer temperature. Our data suggest that biotic resistance might be more important than abiotic stress for invasibility in subarctic tundra and that low temperatures do not necessarily limit seedling establishment at high altitudes. High elevations are therefore potentially more vulnerable to invasion than was originally thought. Changes in community composition as a result of species migration or invasion are most likely to occur in Salix scrub and meadow, whereas Empetrum-dominated rich heath will largely remain unchanged. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Subarctic Tundra IRUA - Institutional Repository van de Universiteit Antwerpen Arctic New Phytologist 197 3 1002 1011
institution Open Polar
collection IRUA - Institutional Repository van de Universiteit Antwerpen
op_collection_id ftunivantwerpen
language English
topic Biology
spellingShingle Biology
Milbau, Ann
Shevtsova, Anna
Osler, Nora
Mooshammer, Maria
Graae, Bente J.
Plant community type and small-scale disturbances, but not altitude, influence the invasibility in subarctic ecosystems
topic_facet Biology
description Abstract: Little of our knowledge about invasibility comes from arctic and alpine ecosystems, despite increasing plant migration and invasion in those regions. Here, we examine how community type, altitude, and small-scale disturbances affect invasibility in a subarctic ecosystem. Over a period of 4 yr, we studied seedling emergence and establishment in 17 species sown in gaps or undisturbed vegetation in four subarctic community types (Salix scrub, meadow, rich heath, poor heath) along an elevation gradient. Invasibility was lowest in rich heath and highest in Salix scrub. Small disturbances significantly increased the invasibility in most communities, thereby showing the importance of biotic resistance to invasion in subarctic regions. Unexpectedly, invasibility did not decrease with increasing elevation, and it was also not related to summer temperature. Our data suggest that biotic resistance might be more important than abiotic stress for invasibility in subarctic tundra and that low temperatures do not necessarily limit seedling establishment at high altitudes. High elevations are therefore potentially more vulnerable to invasion than was originally thought. Changes in community composition as a result of species migration or invasion are most likely to occur in Salix scrub and meadow, whereas Empetrum-dominated rich heath will largely remain unchanged.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Milbau, Ann
Shevtsova, Anna
Osler, Nora
Mooshammer, Maria
Graae, Bente J.
author_facet Milbau, Ann
Shevtsova, Anna
Osler, Nora
Mooshammer, Maria
Graae, Bente J.
author_sort Milbau, Ann
title Plant community type and small-scale disturbances, but not altitude, influence the invasibility in subarctic ecosystems
title_short Plant community type and small-scale disturbances, but not altitude, influence the invasibility in subarctic ecosystems
title_full Plant community type and small-scale disturbances, but not altitude, influence the invasibility in subarctic ecosystems
title_fullStr Plant community type and small-scale disturbances, but not altitude, influence the invasibility in subarctic ecosystems
title_full_unstemmed Plant community type and small-scale disturbances, but not altitude, influence the invasibility in subarctic ecosystems
title_sort plant community type and small-scale disturbances, but not altitude, influence the invasibility in subarctic ecosystems
publishDate 2013
url https://hdl.handle.net/10067/1100830151162165141
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
Subarctic
Tundra
genre_facet Arctic
Subarctic
Tundra
op_source 0028-646X
New phytologist
op_relation info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1111/NPH.12054
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/isi/000313266000032
op_rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1111/NPH.12054
container_title New Phytologist
container_volume 197
container_issue 3
container_start_page 1002
op_container_end_page 1011
_version_ 1771543499687067648