Grizzly bear habitat selection is scale dependent
The purpose of our study is to show how ecologists' interpretation of habitat selection by grizzly bears (Ursus arctos) is altered by the scale of observation and also how management questions would be best addressed using predetermined scales of analysis. Using resource selection functions (RS...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2007
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://era.library.ualberta.ca/items/3b2f8ae0-e8ff-4240-bf85-62d9a0a1435f https://doi.org/10.7939/R3BR9Z |
_version_ | 1833106477103972352 |
---|---|
author | Ciarniello, L. M. Heard, D. C. Boyce, M. S. Seip, D. R. |
author_facet | Ciarniello, L. M. Heard, D. C. Boyce, M. S. Seip, D. R. |
author_sort | Ciarniello, L. M. |
collection | University of Alberta: Era - Education and Research Archive |
description | The purpose of our study is to show how ecologists' interpretation of habitat selection by grizzly bears (Ursus arctos) is altered by the scale of observation and also how management questions would be best addressed using predetermined scales of analysis. Using resource selection functions (RSF) we examined how variation in the spatial extent of availability affected our interpretation of habitat selection by grizzly bears inhabiting mountain and plateau landscapes. We estimated separate models for females and males using three spatial extents: within the study area, within the home range, and within predetermined movement buffers. We employed two methods for evaluating the effects of scale on our RSF designs. First, we chose a priori six candidate models, estimated at each scale, and ranked them using Akaike Information Criteria. Using this method, results changed among scales for males but not for females. For female bears, models that included the full suite of covariates predicted habitat use best at each scale. For male bears that resided in the mountains, models based on forest successional stages ranked highest at the study-wide and home range extents, whereas models containing covariates based on terrain features ranked highest at the buffer extent. For male bears on the plateau, each scale estimated a different highest-ranked model. Second, we examined differences among model coefficients across the three scales for one candidate model. We found that both the magnitude and direction of coefficients were dependent upon the scale examined; results varied between landscapes, scales, and sexes. Greenness, reflecting lush green vegetation, was a strong predictor of the presence of female bears in both landscapes and males that resided in the mountains. Male bears on the plateau were the only animals to select areas that exposed them to a high risk of mortality by humans. Our results show that grizzly bear habitat selection is scale dependent. Further, the selection of resources can be dependent upon the ... |
format | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
genre | Ursus arctos |
genre_facet | Ursus arctos |
geographic | Canada British Columbia |
geographic_facet | Canada British Columbia |
id | ftunivalberta:oai:era.library.ualberta.ca:3b2f8ae0-e8ff-4240-bf85-62d9a0a1435f |
institution | Open Polar |
language | English |
long_lat | ENVELOPE(-125.003,-125.003,54.000,54.000) |
op_collection_id | ftunivalberta |
op_doi | https://doi.org/10.7939/R3BR9Z |
op_relation | doi:10.7939/R3BR9Z |
op_rights | © 2007 Ecological Society of America. This version of this article is open access and can be downloaded and shared. The original author(s) and source must be cited. |
publishDate | 2007 |
record_format | openpolar |
spelling | ftunivalberta:oai:era.library.ualberta.ca:3b2f8ae0-e8ff-4240-bf85-62d9a0a1435f 2025-05-25T13:54:15+00:00 Grizzly bear habitat selection is scale dependent Ciarniello, L. M. Heard, D. C. Boyce, M. S. Seip, D. R. 2007 https://era.library.ualberta.ca/items/3b2f8ae0-e8ff-4240-bf85-62d9a0a1435f https://doi.org/10.7939/R3BR9Z English eng doi:10.7939/R3BR9Z © 2007 Ecological Society of America. This version of this article is open access and can be downloaded and shared. The original author(s) and source must be cited. Ursus arctos Habitat selection Canada Grizzly bears Spatial extent Telemetry British Columbia Resource selection function Article (Published) 2007 ftunivalberta https://doi.org/10.7939/R3BR9Z 2025-04-28T14:33:56Z The purpose of our study is to show how ecologists' interpretation of habitat selection by grizzly bears (Ursus arctos) is altered by the scale of observation and also how management questions would be best addressed using predetermined scales of analysis. Using resource selection functions (RSF) we examined how variation in the spatial extent of availability affected our interpretation of habitat selection by grizzly bears inhabiting mountain and plateau landscapes. We estimated separate models for females and males using three spatial extents: within the study area, within the home range, and within predetermined movement buffers. We employed two methods for evaluating the effects of scale on our RSF designs. First, we chose a priori six candidate models, estimated at each scale, and ranked them using Akaike Information Criteria. Using this method, results changed among scales for males but not for females. For female bears, models that included the full suite of covariates predicted habitat use best at each scale. For male bears that resided in the mountains, models based on forest successional stages ranked highest at the study-wide and home range extents, whereas models containing covariates based on terrain features ranked highest at the buffer extent. For male bears on the plateau, each scale estimated a different highest-ranked model. Second, we examined differences among model coefficients across the three scales for one candidate model. We found that both the magnitude and direction of coefficients were dependent upon the scale examined; results varied between landscapes, scales, and sexes. Greenness, reflecting lush green vegetation, was a strong predictor of the presence of female bears in both landscapes and males that resided in the mountains. Male bears on the plateau were the only animals to select areas that exposed them to a high risk of mortality by humans. Our results show that grizzly bear habitat selection is scale dependent. Further, the selection of resources can be dependent upon the ... Article in Journal/Newspaper Ursus arctos University of Alberta: Era - Education and Research Archive Canada British Columbia ENVELOPE(-125.003,-125.003,54.000,54.000) |
spellingShingle | Ursus arctos Habitat selection Canada Grizzly bears Spatial extent Telemetry British Columbia Resource selection function Ciarniello, L. M. Heard, D. C. Boyce, M. S. Seip, D. R. Grizzly bear habitat selection is scale dependent |
title | Grizzly bear habitat selection is scale dependent |
title_full | Grizzly bear habitat selection is scale dependent |
title_fullStr | Grizzly bear habitat selection is scale dependent |
title_full_unstemmed | Grizzly bear habitat selection is scale dependent |
title_short | Grizzly bear habitat selection is scale dependent |
title_sort | grizzly bear habitat selection is scale dependent |
topic | Ursus arctos Habitat selection Canada Grizzly bears Spatial extent Telemetry British Columbia Resource selection function |
topic_facet | Ursus arctos Habitat selection Canada Grizzly bears Spatial extent Telemetry British Columbia Resource selection function |
url | https://era.library.ualberta.ca/items/3b2f8ae0-e8ff-4240-bf85-62d9a0a1435f https://doi.org/10.7939/R3BR9Z |