Alaska as a Case Study of OJJDP-Mandated Jail Monitoring

The Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency prevention has mandated that all states monitor jail records for the presence of juveniles and inspect jails and lock-ups in which juveniles might be detained for sight and sound separation. The experience of Alaska in complying with this mandate is ins...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Schafer, N. E., Read, Emily E.
Format: Report
Language:English
Published: Justice Center, University of Alaska Anchorage 1990
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/11122/7566
id ftunivalaska:oai:scholarworks.alaska.edu:11122/7566
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivalaska:oai:scholarworks.alaska.edu:11122/7566 2023-05-15T17:40:12+02:00 Alaska as a Case Study of OJJDP-Mandated Jail Monitoring Schafer, N. E. Read, Emily E. 1990-10-03 http://hdl.handle.net/11122/7566 en_US eng Justice Center, University of Alaska Anchorage Schafer, N.E.; & Read, Emily E. (1990). "Alaska as a Case Study of OJJDP-Mandated Jail Monitoring." Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwestern Criminal Justice Association, Chicago, Oct 1990. JC 9106.01 http://hdl.handle.net/11122/7566 Alaska jails juvenile corrections juvenile jail monitoring Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act (JJDPA) Working Paper 1990 ftunivalaska 2023-02-23T21:36:51Z The Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency prevention has mandated that all states monitor jail records for the presence of juveniles and inspect jails and lock-ups in which juveniles might be detained for sight and sound separation. The experience of Alaska in complying with this mandate is instructive. In the largest state in the union 99 facilities in a monitoring universe of 111 (89.1 %) are accessible only by air or water. Alaska's jail monitoring plan accommodated this inaccessibility. The plan and 1989 monitoring activities are explained and discussed. As the largest state in the Union Alaska has had some unique problems complying with the mandate of the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Act to monitor secure facilities for the presence of juveniles. In spite of these problems Alaska has produced a model monitoring plan and has successfully completed three years of compliance monitoring activities. The monitoring process and the problems associated with monitoring activities are useful for other states to consider as they review their monitoring plans. Abstract / Introduction / Jail Monitoring in Alaska / Special Problems / Discussion / References / FIGURES / Figure 1. Monitoring Universe — Secure Facilities / Figure 2. The North Slope Borough / Figure 3. JJDP Violations — 1988 Report north slope Alaska University of Alaska: ScholarWorks@UA
institution Open Polar
collection University of Alaska: ScholarWorks@UA
op_collection_id ftunivalaska
language English
topic Alaska
jails
juvenile corrections
juvenile jail monitoring
Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act (JJDPA)
spellingShingle Alaska
jails
juvenile corrections
juvenile jail monitoring
Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act (JJDPA)
Schafer, N. E.
Read, Emily E.
Alaska as a Case Study of OJJDP-Mandated Jail Monitoring
topic_facet Alaska
jails
juvenile corrections
juvenile jail monitoring
Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act (JJDPA)
description The Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency prevention has mandated that all states monitor jail records for the presence of juveniles and inspect jails and lock-ups in which juveniles might be detained for sight and sound separation. The experience of Alaska in complying with this mandate is instructive. In the largest state in the union 99 facilities in a monitoring universe of 111 (89.1 %) are accessible only by air or water. Alaska's jail monitoring plan accommodated this inaccessibility. The plan and 1989 monitoring activities are explained and discussed. As the largest state in the Union Alaska has had some unique problems complying with the mandate of the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Act to monitor secure facilities for the presence of juveniles. In spite of these problems Alaska has produced a model monitoring plan and has successfully completed three years of compliance monitoring activities. The monitoring process and the problems associated with monitoring activities are useful for other states to consider as they review their monitoring plans. Abstract / Introduction / Jail Monitoring in Alaska / Special Problems / Discussion / References / FIGURES / Figure 1. Monitoring Universe — Secure Facilities / Figure 2. The North Slope Borough / Figure 3. JJDP Violations — 1988
format Report
author Schafer, N. E.
Read, Emily E.
author_facet Schafer, N. E.
Read, Emily E.
author_sort Schafer, N. E.
title Alaska as a Case Study of OJJDP-Mandated Jail Monitoring
title_short Alaska as a Case Study of OJJDP-Mandated Jail Monitoring
title_full Alaska as a Case Study of OJJDP-Mandated Jail Monitoring
title_fullStr Alaska as a Case Study of OJJDP-Mandated Jail Monitoring
title_full_unstemmed Alaska as a Case Study of OJJDP-Mandated Jail Monitoring
title_sort alaska as a case study of ojjdp-mandated jail monitoring
publisher Justice Center, University of Alaska Anchorage
publishDate 1990
url http://hdl.handle.net/11122/7566
genre north slope
Alaska
genre_facet north slope
Alaska
op_relation Schafer, N.E.; & Read, Emily E. (1990). "Alaska as a Case Study of OJJDP-Mandated Jail Monitoring." Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwestern Criminal Justice Association, Chicago, Oct 1990.
JC 9106.01
http://hdl.handle.net/11122/7566
_version_ 1766141069853982720