Evaluation of wolf density estimation from radiotelemetry data

Thesis (M.S.) University of Alaska Fairbanks, 2001 Density estimation of wolves (Canis lupus) requires a count of individuals and an estimate of area those individuals inhabit. With radiomarked wolves, the count is straightforward but estimation of area is more difficult and often given inadequate a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Burch, John W.
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: 2001
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/11122/4934
id ftunivalaska:oai:scholarworks.alaska.edu:11122/4934
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivalaska:oai:scholarworks.alaska.edu:11122/4934 2023-05-15T15:50:11+02:00 Evaluation of wolf density estimation from radiotelemetry data Burch, John W. 2001-05 http://hdl.handle.net/11122/4934 en_US eng http://hdl.handle.net/11122/4934 Department of Biology and Wildlife Thesis ms 2001 ftunivalaska 2023-02-23T21:36:19Z Thesis (M.S.) University of Alaska Fairbanks, 2001 Density estimation of wolves (Canis lupus) requires a count of individuals and an estimate of area those individuals inhabit. With radiomarked wolves, the count is straightforward but estimation of area is more difficult and often given inadequate attention. The population area, based on the mosaic of pack territories, is influenced by sampling intensity similar to individual home ranges. If sampling intensity is low, population area will be underestimated and wolf density will be inflated. Using data from studies in Denali National Park and Preserve, I investigated these relationships using Monte Carlo simulation to evaluate effects of radiolocation effort and number of marked packs on density estimation. As the number of adjoining pack home ranges increase, fewer relocations are necessary to define a given percentage of population area. I evaluated the utility of nonlinear regression to adjust for biases associated with under sampling and present recommendations for monitoring wolves via radiotelemetry. Thesis Canis lupus Alaska University of Alaska: ScholarWorks@UA Fairbanks
institution Open Polar
collection University of Alaska: ScholarWorks@UA
op_collection_id ftunivalaska
language English
description Thesis (M.S.) University of Alaska Fairbanks, 2001 Density estimation of wolves (Canis lupus) requires a count of individuals and an estimate of area those individuals inhabit. With radiomarked wolves, the count is straightforward but estimation of area is more difficult and often given inadequate attention. The population area, based on the mosaic of pack territories, is influenced by sampling intensity similar to individual home ranges. If sampling intensity is low, population area will be underestimated and wolf density will be inflated. Using data from studies in Denali National Park and Preserve, I investigated these relationships using Monte Carlo simulation to evaluate effects of radiolocation effort and number of marked packs on density estimation. As the number of adjoining pack home ranges increase, fewer relocations are necessary to define a given percentage of population area. I evaluated the utility of nonlinear regression to adjust for biases associated with under sampling and present recommendations for monitoring wolves via radiotelemetry.
format Thesis
author Burch, John W.
spellingShingle Burch, John W.
Evaluation of wolf density estimation from radiotelemetry data
author_facet Burch, John W.
author_sort Burch, John W.
title Evaluation of wolf density estimation from radiotelemetry data
title_short Evaluation of wolf density estimation from radiotelemetry data
title_full Evaluation of wolf density estimation from radiotelemetry data
title_fullStr Evaluation of wolf density estimation from radiotelemetry data
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of wolf density estimation from radiotelemetry data
title_sort evaluation of wolf density estimation from radiotelemetry data
publishDate 2001
url http://hdl.handle.net/11122/4934
geographic Fairbanks
geographic_facet Fairbanks
genre Canis lupus
Alaska
genre_facet Canis lupus
Alaska
op_relation http://hdl.handle.net/11122/4934
Department of Biology and Wildlife
_version_ 1766385161398648832