Studies of Ground Conductivity in the Territory of Alaska

The effective ground conductivity of Alaska has been determined by a comparison of experimental and theoretical field strengths. The experimental field strengths have been obtained by use of an airborne receiver, flown along radial paths from a large number of CAA radio ranges and beacons. The surfa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Stanley, Glenn M.
Format: Report
Language:English
Published: Geophysical Institute at the University of Alaska 1958
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/11122/3537
id ftunivalaska:oai:scholarworks.alaska.edu:11122/3537
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivalaska:oai:scholarworks.alaska.edu:11122/3537 2023-05-15T15:39:41+02:00 Studies of Ground Conductivity in the Territory of Alaska Stanley, Glenn M. 1958-10-31 http://hdl.handle.net/11122/3537 en_US eng Geophysical Institute at the University of Alaska http://hdl.handle.net/11122/3537 Geophysical Institute Report 1958 ftunivalaska 2023-02-23T21:36:02Z The effective ground conductivity of Alaska has been determined by a comparison of experimental and theoretical field strengths. The experimental field strengths have been obtained by use of an airborne receiver, flown along radial paths from a large number of CAA radio ranges and beacons. The surface wave attenuation factor was computed for both a plane and a curved, homogeneous earth by methods presented by Norton. The experimentally determined relative field strengths were plotted as a function of distance and were compared with a family of curves for assumed values of conductivity and dielectric constant. From this comparison, that value of conductivity that best fits the experimental data is taken as the effective conductivity over the path. An investigation of the effect at dielectric constant on the transmitted signal shows that, within the frequency range used, a change of dielectric constant from 1 to 20 has but little effect on the attenuation of the transmitted signal for values of conductivity between 1 and 5 mmho/m. The experimental results indicate that for most sections of Alaska, the effective conductivity falls within this range. In some cases the earth was not homogeneous over the entire flight path as evidenced by changes in the slope of the field strength vs distance curves. In such cases, the data were replotted with an initial point at the discontinuity and new theoretical curves were drawn for each section of the field strength vs distance curves. Investigation of the variation of effective conductivity with change of frequency and at different seasons was made. In addition, wave tilt methods of determining the conductivity were used. A 'Ground Constants Measuring Set' was obtained from the Signal Corps and measurements were made in selected areas in Alaska. Attempts were made to use 1height-gain' and 'mutual coupling of loops' techniques but these were not successful. An investigation of anomolous propagation in the vicinity of Point Barrow was made. It was determined that this anomolous ... Report Barrow Point Barrow Alaska University of Alaska: ScholarWorks@UA
institution Open Polar
collection University of Alaska: ScholarWorks@UA
op_collection_id ftunivalaska
language English
description The effective ground conductivity of Alaska has been determined by a comparison of experimental and theoretical field strengths. The experimental field strengths have been obtained by use of an airborne receiver, flown along radial paths from a large number of CAA radio ranges and beacons. The surface wave attenuation factor was computed for both a plane and a curved, homogeneous earth by methods presented by Norton. The experimentally determined relative field strengths were plotted as a function of distance and were compared with a family of curves for assumed values of conductivity and dielectric constant. From this comparison, that value of conductivity that best fits the experimental data is taken as the effective conductivity over the path. An investigation of the effect at dielectric constant on the transmitted signal shows that, within the frequency range used, a change of dielectric constant from 1 to 20 has but little effect on the attenuation of the transmitted signal for values of conductivity between 1 and 5 mmho/m. The experimental results indicate that for most sections of Alaska, the effective conductivity falls within this range. In some cases the earth was not homogeneous over the entire flight path as evidenced by changes in the slope of the field strength vs distance curves. In such cases, the data were replotted with an initial point at the discontinuity and new theoretical curves were drawn for each section of the field strength vs distance curves. Investigation of the variation of effective conductivity with change of frequency and at different seasons was made. In addition, wave tilt methods of determining the conductivity were used. A 'Ground Constants Measuring Set' was obtained from the Signal Corps and measurements were made in selected areas in Alaska. Attempts were made to use 1height-gain' and 'mutual coupling of loops' techniques but these were not successful. An investigation of anomolous propagation in the vicinity of Point Barrow was made. It was determined that this anomolous ...
format Report
author Stanley, Glenn M.
spellingShingle Stanley, Glenn M.
Studies of Ground Conductivity in the Territory of Alaska
author_facet Stanley, Glenn M.
author_sort Stanley, Glenn M.
title Studies of Ground Conductivity in the Territory of Alaska
title_short Studies of Ground Conductivity in the Territory of Alaska
title_full Studies of Ground Conductivity in the Territory of Alaska
title_fullStr Studies of Ground Conductivity in the Territory of Alaska
title_full_unstemmed Studies of Ground Conductivity in the Territory of Alaska
title_sort studies of ground conductivity in the territory of alaska
publisher Geophysical Institute at the University of Alaska
publishDate 1958
url http://hdl.handle.net/11122/3537
genre Barrow
Point Barrow
Alaska
genre_facet Barrow
Point Barrow
Alaska
op_source Geophysical Institute
op_relation http://hdl.handle.net/11122/3537
_version_ 1766371723672813568