Heavy Oil Development: The Economic Impact

The extension of North Slope oil production, through new discoveries, enhanced recovery techniques, and development of marginal fields, has received considerable public policy _ attention. Less discussed have been the reserves of heavy crude oil. While more difficult to produce, there are billions o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Tuck, Bradford
Format: Report
Language:English
Published: Institute of Social and Economic Research, University of Alaska. 1995
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/11122/12439
id ftunivalaska:oai:scholarworks.alaska.edu:11122/12439
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivalaska:oai:scholarworks.alaska.edu:11122/12439 2023-05-15T17:40:13+02:00 Heavy Oil Development: The Economic Impact Tuck, Bradford 1995 http://hdl.handle.net/11122/12439 en_US eng Institute of Social and Economic Research, University of Alaska. http://hdl.handle.net/11122/12439 North Slope oil production hypothesized development Milne Point Unit-Schrader Bluff area marginal fields analysis aggregate impacts Report 1995 ftunivalaska 2023-02-23T21:37:55Z The extension of North Slope oil production, through new discoveries, enhanced recovery techniques, and development of marginal fields, has received considerable public policy _ attention. Less discussed have been the reserves of heavy crude oil. While more difficult to produce, there are billions of barrels of reserves in place. The present study looks at the economic impact of an hypothesized development of heavy oil in the Milne Point Unit-Schrader Bluff area. The general dimensions of the project envision development expenditures of about $550 million, with the bulk of that spread over the first nine years of the project. In addition, production expenses are estimated at about $600 million, or an average of $14. 7 million per year over the forty-one year production life of the project. Average production of oil is approximately 20 thousand barrels per day over the life of the field.The economic impact methodology used is based on that employed by Professor Scott Goldsmith in his study Marginal Oil Field Development: The Economic Impact (Institute of Social and Economic Research, University of Alaska Anchorage; June 5, 1995). The basic objective in this type of impact analysis is to measure the change in aggregate expenditure, employment, and population effects in both the private and public sectors that result from the direct project expenditures. In other words, how does the economy look with the project, as compared to without the project. The analysis can look either at impacts on some periodic basis, such as changes in the annual level of activity. or at the aggregate impacts over the life of the project. BP Exploration (Alaska) Inc. Report north slope Alaska University of Alaska: ScholarWorks@UA Anchorage Milne Point ENVELOPE(-100.852,-100.852,73.835,73.835)
institution Open Polar
collection University of Alaska: ScholarWorks@UA
op_collection_id ftunivalaska
language English
topic North Slope oil production
hypothesized development
Milne Point Unit-Schrader Bluff area
marginal fields
analysis
aggregate impacts
spellingShingle North Slope oil production
hypothesized development
Milne Point Unit-Schrader Bluff area
marginal fields
analysis
aggregate impacts
Tuck, Bradford
Heavy Oil Development: The Economic Impact
topic_facet North Slope oil production
hypothesized development
Milne Point Unit-Schrader Bluff area
marginal fields
analysis
aggregate impacts
description The extension of North Slope oil production, through new discoveries, enhanced recovery techniques, and development of marginal fields, has received considerable public policy _ attention. Less discussed have been the reserves of heavy crude oil. While more difficult to produce, there are billions of barrels of reserves in place. The present study looks at the economic impact of an hypothesized development of heavy oil in the Milne Point Unit-Schrader Bluff area. The general dimensions of the project envision development expenditures of about $550 million, with the bulk of that spread over the first nine years of the project. In addition, production expenses are estimated at about $600 million, or an average of $14. 7 million per year over the forty-one year production life of the project. Average production of oil is approximately 20 thousand barrels per day over the life of the field.The economic impact methodology used is based on that employed by Professor Scott Goldsmith in his study Marginal Oil Field Development: The Economic Impact (Institute of Social and Economic Research, University of Alaska Anchorage; June 5, 1995). The basic objective in this type of impact analysis is to measure the change in aggregate expenditure, employment, and population effects in both the private and public sectors that result from the direct project expenditures. In other words, how does the economy look with the project, as compared to without the project. The analysis can look either at impacts on some periodic basis, such as changes in the annual level of activity. or at the aggregate impacts over the life of the project. BP Exploration (Alaska) Inc.
format Report
author Tuck, Bradford
author_facet Tuck, Bradford
author_sort Tuck, Bradford
title Heavy Oil Development: The Economic Impact
title_short Heavy Oil Development: The Economic Impact
title_full Heavy Oil Development: The Economic Impact
title_fullStr Heavy Oil Development: The Economic Impact
title_full_unstemmed Heavy Oil Development: The Economic Impact
title_sort heavy oil development: the economic impact
publisher Institute of Social and Economic Research, University of Alaska.
publishDate 1995
url http://hdl.handle.net/11122/12439
long_lat ENVELOPE(-100.852,-100.852,73.835,73.835)
geographic Anchorage
Milne Point
geographic_facet Anchorage
Milne Point
genre north slope
Alaska
genre_facet north slope
Alaska
op_relation http://hdl.handle.net/11122/12439
_version_ 1766141093841207296