The Past and Future of LNG in Alaska

• Main Author: Tussing, Arlon R.
• Format: Report
• Language: English
• Published: Institute of Social and Economic Research, University of Alaska. 2005
• Subjects: liquified natural gas; Kenai; pipeline proposal; North Slope; Arctic; Arctic Ocean; Canada; Fairbanks; North Star; north slope; Prudhoe Bay; TransAlaska; Alaska
• Online Access: http://hdl.handle.net/11122/12120

Why do negotiations between the State and the North Slope gas producers ignore LNG [liquefied natural gas] export proposals, including that of the Alaska Gasline Port Authority [AGPA]? The three main North Slope gas producers [ConocoPhillips, BP and ExxonMobil], and Alaska’s Murkowski Administration, agree that an overland pipeline from Prudhoe Bay, crossing Canada to the U.S. Midwest, is the most promising transport system under present and foreseeable conditions, for marketing Arctic gas. Nevertheless, plans to ship LNG in “cryogenic” [low-pressure refrigerated] tankers from a Southcentral Alaska port such as Valdez or Kenai, to the Lower 48 or East Asia remain technically plausible marketing alternatives to a transcontinental gas pipeline. Currently, the most prominent proposal for such an alternative is sponsored by the Alaska Gasline Port Authority [AGPA], a coalition of three municipalities—the North Slope and Fairbanks North Star Boroughs, and the City of Valdez—which are located North to South along the route of the TransAlaska oil pipeline from the Arctic Ocean to Prince William Sound.