How well do fossil assemblages of the Ediacara Biota tell time?

Patterns of origination, evolution, and extinction of early animal life on this planet are largely interpreted from the fossils of the Precambrian soft-bodied Ediacara Biota, spanning nearly 40 m.y. of the terminal Ediacaran period. Localities containing these fossils are loosely considered as part...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Geology
Main Authors: Gehling, J., Droser, M.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Geological Soc America Inc 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2440/79682
https://doi.org/10.1130/G33881.1
id ftunivadelaidedl:oai:digital.library.adelaide.edu.au:2440/79682
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivadelaidedl:oai:digital.library.adelaide.edu.au:2440/79682 2023-12-24T10:25:32+01:00 How well do fossil assemblages of the Ediacara Biota tell time? Gehling, J. Droser, M. 2013 http://hdl.handle.net/2440/79682 https://doi.org/10.1130/G33881.1 en eng Geological Soc America Inc http://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/DP0453393 Geology (Boulder), 2013; 41(4):447-450 0091-7613 1943-2682 http://hdl.handle.net/2440/79682 doi:10.1130/G33881.1 © 2013 Geological Society of America http://dx.doi.org/10.1130/g33881.1 Journal article 2013 ftunivadelaidedl https://doi.org/10.1130/G33881.110.1130/g33881.1 2023-11-27T23:24:08Z Patterns of origination, evolution, and extinction of early animal life on this planet are largely interpreted from the fossils of the Precambrian soft-bodied Ediacara Biota, spanning nearly 40 m.y. of the terminal Ediacaran period. Localities containing these fossils are loosely considered as part of either the Avalon, White Sea, or Nama Associations. These associations have been interpreted to have temporal, paleobiogeographic, preservational, and/or paleoenvironmental significance. Surprisingly, elements of all three associations occur within the Ediacara Member of the Rawnsley Quartzite of South Australia. An analysis of over 5000 specimens demonstrates that fossil distribution is strongly controlled by facies and taphonomy rather than time or biogeography and that individual taxa vary considerably in their environmental tolerance and taphonomic integrity. The recognition that these taxa represent organisms living in various distinct environments, both juxtaposed and shared, holds strong implications for our interpretation of the record of early animal life on this planet and questions the biostratigraphic utility of the three associations. Furthermore, although in situ soft-bodied preservation provides a unique perspective on composition of benthic fossil assemblages, the record should not be interpreted as a simple “snapshot”. Fossil beds represent a range of preservational modifications varying from current winnowed census samples of benthic communities at different depths and ecological maturity, to entirely transported assemblages. Unless the appropriate environments and taphonomic conditions are present for certain taxa, the absence of a particular taxon may or may not indicate its extinction in space or time. James G. Gehling and Mary L. Droser Article in Journal/Newspaper White Sea The University of Adelaide: Digital Library White Sea Geology 41 4 447 450
institution Open Polar
collection The University of Adelaide: Digital Library
op_collection_id ftunivadelaidedl
language English
description Patterns of origination, evolution, and extinction of early animal life on this planet are largely interpreted from the fossils of the Precambrian soft-bodied Ediacara Biota, spanning nearly 40 m.y. of the terminal Ediacaran period. Localities containing these fossils are loosely considered as part of either the Avalon, White Sea, or Nama Associations. These associations have been interpreted to have temporal, paleobiogeographic, preservational, and/or paleoenvironmental significance. Surprisingly, elements of all three associations occur within the Ediacara Member of the Rawnsley Quartzite of South Australia. An analysis of over 5000 specimens demonstrates that fossil distribution is strongly controlled by facies and taphonomy rather than time or biogeography and that individual taxa vary considerably in their environmental tolerance and taphonomic integrity. The recognition that these taxa represent organisms living in various distinct environments, both juxtaposed and shared, holds strong implications for our interpretation of the record of early animal life on this planet and questions the biostratigraphic utility of the three associations. Furthermore, although in situ soft-bodied preservation provides a unique perspective on composition of benthic fossil assemblages, the record should not be interpreted as a simple “snapshot”. Fossil beds represent a range of preservational modifications varying from current winnowed census samples of benthic communities at different depths and ecological maturity, to entirely transported assemblages. Unless the appropriate environments and taphonomic conditions are present for certain taxa, the absence of a particular taxon may or may not indicate its extinction in space or time. James G. Gehling and Mary L. Droser
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Gehling, J.
Droser, M.
spellingShingle Gehling, J.
Droser, M.
How well do fossil assemblages of the Ediacara Biota tell time?
author_facet Gehling, J.
Droser, M.
author_sort Gehling, J.
title How well do fossil assemblages of the Ediacara Biota tell time?
title_short How well do fossil assemblages of the Ediacara Biota tell time?
title_full How well do fossil assemblages of the Ediacara Biota tell time?
title_fullStr How well do fossil assemblages of the Ediacara Biota tell time?
title_full_unstemmed How well do fossil assemblages of the Ediacara Biota tell time?
title_sort how well do fossil assemblages of the ediacara biota tell time?
publisher Geological Soc America Inc
publishDate 2013
url http://hdl.handle.net/2440/79682
https://doi.org/10.1130/G33881.1
geographic White Sea
geographic_facet White Sea
genre White Sea
genre_facet White Sea
op_source http://dx.doi.org/10.1130/g33881.1
op_relation http://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/DP0453393
Geology (Boulder), 2013; 41(4):447-450
0091-7613
1943-2682
http://hdl.handle.net/2440/79682
doi:10.1130/G33881.1
op_rights © 2013 Geological Society of America
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1130/G33881.110.1130/g33881.1
container_title Geology
container_volume 41
container_issue 4
container_start_page 447
op_container_end_page 450
_version_ 1786201438837276672