Palaeoproterozoic accretion processes of Australia and comparisons with Laurentia

The Palaeoproterozoic rocks of Australia and Laurentia preserve an excellent record of the accretionary tectonics associated with transitions between the Columbia (Nuna) and Rodinia supercontinents. The geologic records of Australia and Laurentia suggest that the dominant tectonic driver was one or...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:International Geology Review
Main Authors: Betts, P., Giles, D., Aitken, A.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: V H Winston & Son Inc 2011
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2440/68493
https://doi.org/10.1080/00206814.2010.527646
id ftunivadelaidedl:oai:digital.library.adelaide.edu.au:2440/68493
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivadelaidedl:oai:digital.library.adelaide.edu.au:2440/68493 2023-12-17T10:20:17+01:00 Palaeoproterozoic accretion processes of Australia and comparisons with Laurentia Betts, P. Giles, D. Aitken, A. 2011 http://hdl.handle.net/2440/68493 https://doi.org/10.1080/00206814.2010.527646 en eng V H Winston & Son Inc http://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/LP0882000 International Geology Review, 2011; 53(11-12 Sp Is):1357-1376 0020-6814 1938-2839 http://hdl.handle.net/2440/68493 doi:10.1080/00206814.2010.527646 © 2011 Taylor & Francis Palaeoproterozoic accretion Laurentia Australia subduction roll back heat production lithospheric strength Journal article 2011 ftunivadelaidedl https://doi.org/10.1080/00206814.2010.527646 2023-11-20T23:28:48Z The Palaeoproterozoic rocks of Australia and Laurentia preserve an excellent record of the accretionary tectonics associated with transitions between the Columbia (Nuna) and Rodinia supercontinents. The geologic records of Australia and Laurentia suggest that the dominant tectonic driver was one or more subduction zones in which several episodes of crustal accretion occurred between ca. 1790 Ma and 1620 Ma. Correlated orogenic events include the ca. 1800–1780 Ma Yapungku–Yambah (Australia)–Medicine Bow (Laurentia) orogenies, ca. 1740–1690 Ma Strangways–Kimban (Australia)–Nimrod (Antarctica)–Yavapai (Laurentia) orogenies, and the ca. 1650–1620 Ma Leibig–Ooldea (Australia)–Mazatzal (Laurentia) orogenies. There are major differences in the style of accretion: Laurentia is characterized by accretion of dominantly juvenile arc terranes, whereas accreted Australian terranes are more evolved and are isotopically similar to the continental nucleus. Adjacent to its plate margin, the Australian continent contained regions of elevated heat production compared with the Laurentian margin. Brace-Goetze lithospheric strength models for ca. 1700 Ma indicate that the Australian plate margin was significantly weaker than that of Laurentia. This variation in lithospheric strength is interpreted to impact the behaviour of the overriding plate during subduction roll back. Attenuation of the Australian lithosphere during ductile extension caused rifting of large continental fragments from the plate margin. Their subsequent accretion resulted in the re-amalgamation of pre-existing continental lithosphere similar to the lithosphere in the overriding plate. Subduction roll back adjacent to the cold and rigid Laurentian margin (e.g. the Wyoming Craton) had relatively little impact on the overriding plate, with oceanic back-arc basins and juvenile arc terranes developing outboard of the plate margin. Inversion of these arc and oceanic back-arc terranes resulted in episodic continental growth. Peter G. Betts, David Giles and Alan Aitken Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctica The University of Adelaide: Digital Library Aitken ENVELOPE(-44.516,-44.516,-60.733,-60.733) Giles ENVELOPE(-137.617,-137.617,-75.150,-75.150) Nimrod ENVELOPE(165.750,165.750,-85.417,-85.417) International Geology Review 53 11-12 1357 1376
institution Open Polar
collection The University of Adelaide: Digital Library
op_collection_id ftunivadelaidedl
language English
topic Palaeoproterozoic accretion
Laurentia
Australia
subduction roll back
heat production
lithospheric strength
spellingShingle Palaeoproterozoic accretion
Laurentia
Australia
subduction roll back
heat production
lithospheric strength
Betts, P.
Giles, D.
Aitken, A.
Palaeoproterozoic accretion processes of Australia and comparisons with Laurentia
topic_facet Palaeoproterozoic accretion
Laurentia
Australia
subduction roll back
heat production
lithospheric strength
description The Palaeoproterozoic rocks of Australia and Laurentia preserve an excellent record of the accretionary tectonics associated with transitions between the Columbia (Nuna) and Rodinia supercontinents. The geologic records of Australia and Laurentia suggest that the dominant tectonic driver was one or more subduction zones in which several episodes of crustal accretion occurred between ca. 1790 Ma and 1620 Ma. Correlated orogenic events include the ca. 1800–1780 Ma Yapungku–Yambah (Australia)–Medicine Bow (Laurentia) orogenies, ca. 1740–1690 Ma Strangways–Kimban (Australia)–Nimrod (Antarctica)–Yavapai (Laurentia) orogenies, and the ca. 1650–1620 Ma Leibig–Ooldea (Australia)–Mazatzal (Laurentia) orogenies. There are major differences in the style of accretion: Laurentia is characterized by accretion of dominantly juvenile arc terranes, whereas accreted Australian terranes are more evolved and are isotopically similar to the continental nucleus. Adjacent to its plate margin, the Australian continent contained regions of elevated heat production compared with the Laurentian margin. Brace-Goetze lithospheric strength models for ca. 1700 Ma indicate that the Australian plate margin was significantly weaker than that of Laurentia. This variation in lithospheric strength is interpreted to impact the behaviour of the overriding plate during subduction roll back. Attenuation of the Australian lithosphere during ductile extension caused rifting of large continental fragments from the plate margin. Their subsequent accretion resulted in the re-amalgamation of pre-existing continental lithosphere similar to the lithosphere in the overriding plate. Subduction roll back adjacent to the cold and rigid Laurentian margin (e.g. the Wyoming Craton) had relatively little impact on the overriding plate, with oceanic back-arc basins and juvenile arc terranes developing outboard of the plate margin. Inversion of these arc and oceanic back-arc terranes resulted in episodic continental growth. Peter G. Betts, David Giles and Alan Aitken
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Betts, P.
Giles, D.
Aitken, A.
author_facet Betts, P.
Giles, D.
Aitken, A.
author_sort Betts, P.
title Palaeoproterozoic accretion processes of Australia and comparisons with Laurentia
title_short Palaeoproterozoic accretion processes of Australia and comparisons with Laurentia
title_full Palaeoproterozoic accretion processes of Australia and comparisons with Laurentia
title_fullStr Palaeoproterozoic accretion processes of Australia and comparisons with Laurentia
title_full_unstemmed Palaeoproterozoic accretion processes of Australia and comparisons with Laurentia
title_sort palaeoproterozoic accretion processes of australia and comparisons with laurentia
publisher V H Winston & Son Inc
publishDate 2011
url http://hdl.handle.net/2440/68493
https://doi.org/10.1080/00206814.2010.527646
long_lat ENVELOPE(-44.516,-44.516,-60.733,-60.733)
ENVELOPE(-137.617,-137.617,-75.150,-75.150)
ENVELOPE(165.750,165.750,-85.417,-85.417)
geographic Aitken
Giles
Nimrod
geographic_facet Aitken
Giles
Nimrod
genre Antarc*
Antarctica
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctica
op_relation http://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/LP0882000
International Geology Review, 2011; 53(11-12 Sp Is):1357-1376
0020-6814
1938-2839
http://hdl.handle.net/2440/68493
doi:10.1080/00206814.2010.527646
op_rights © 2011 Taylor & Francis
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1080/00206814.2010.527646
container_title International Geology Review
container_volume 53
container_issue 11-12
container_start_page 1357
op_container_end_page 1376
_version_ 1785590555707703296