Sexual size dimorphism and assortative mating in the short- tailed shearwater puffinus tenuirostris

© Marine Ornithology 2008 To improve methods for sexing live birds in field studies, we assessed sexual size dimorphism in the Short-tailed Shearwater Puffinus tenuirostris and produced a sex-discriminating function. Despite a degree of overlap in body size, males were significantly larger than fema...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Einoder, L., Page, B., Goldsworthy, S.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: African Seabird Group 2008
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2440/53896
id ftunivadelaidedl:oai:digital.library.adelaide.edu.au:2440/53896
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivadelaidedl:oai:digital.library.adelaide.edu.au:2440/53896 2023-05-15T18:03:44+02:00 Sexual size dimorphism and assortative mating in the short- tailed shearwater puffinus tenuirostris Einoder, L. Page, B. Goldsworthy, S. 2008 http://hdl.handle.net/2440/53896 en eng African Seabird Group Marine Ornithology, 2008; 36(2):167-173 1018-3337 http://hdl.handle.net/2440/53896 http://www.marineornithology.org/cgi-bin/getpage.cgi?vol=36&no=2 Assortative mating bill depth intercolony variation sexing sexual size dimorphism Journal article 2008 ftunivadelaidedl 2023-02-06T06:49:45Z © Marine Ornithology 2008 To improve methods for sexing live birds in field studies, we assessed sexual size dimorphism in the Short-tailed Shearwater Puffinus tenuirostris and produced a sex-discriminating function. Despite a degree of overlap in body size, males were significantly larger than females. A stepwise discriminant function analysis of five morphometric characters indicated that bill depth and head length were the most dimorphic characters, and the resultant sex model correctly discriminated 92.0% of known males (23 of 25), and 92.3% of known females (24 of 26). The model was validated by applying it to an additional group of birds whose sex was assumed, based on their pairing with known-sex individuals. Of the assumed females, 93% were correctly classified (n = 15), as were 96% of males (n = 15). Application of the sex model to another breeding colony reduced its performance to 70%–82% accuracy because of the existence of significant geographic variation in body size in this species. For individuals in which certainty was low (i.e. when small males are confused with large females), sexing could be improved by measuring the body size of the breeding partner. This improvement was a result of significant positive assortative mating with respect to bill depth and a body size index. This sex model provides a quick and easy means of sexing in instances in which molecular methods and other techniques are not feasible. Luke D. Einoder, Brad Page and Simon D. Goldsworthy Article in Journal/Newspaper Puffinus tenuirostris The University of Adelaide: Digital Library Luke ENVELOPE(-94.855,-94.855,56.296,56.296)
institution Open Polar
collection The University of Adelaide: Digital Library
op_collection_id ftunivadelaidedl
language English
topic Assortative mating
bill depth
intercolony variation
sexing
sexual size dimorphism
spellingShingle Assortative mating
bill depth
intercolony variation
sexing
sexual size dimorphism
Einoder, L.
Page, B.
Goldsworthy, S.
Sexual size dimorphism and assortative mating in the short- tailed shearwater puffinus tenuirostris
topic_facet Assortative mating
bill depth
intercolony variation
sexing
sexual size dimorphism
description © Marine Ornithology 2008 To improve methods for sexing live birds in field studies, we assessed sexual size dimorphism in the Short-tailed Shearwater Puffinus tenuirostris and produced a sex-discriminating function. Despite a degree of overlap in body size, males were significantly larger than females. A stepwise discriminant function analysis of five morphometric characters indicated that bill depth and head length were the most dimorphic characters, and the resultant sex model correctly discriminated 92.0% of known males (23 of 25), and 92.3% of known females (24 of 26). The model was validated by applying it to an additional group of birds whose sex was assumed, based on their pairing with known-sex individuals. Of the assumed females, 93% were correctly classified (n = 15), as were 96% of males (n = 15). Application of the sex model to another breeding colony reduced its performance to 70%–82% accuracy because of the existence of significant geographic variation in body size in this species. For individuals in which certainty was low (i.e. when small males are confused with large females), sexing could be improved by measuring the body size of the breeding partner. This improvement was a result of significant positive assortative mating with respect to bill depth and a body size index. This sex model provides a quick and easy means of sexing in instances in which molecular methods and other techniques are not feasible. Luke D. Einoder, Brad Page and Simon D. Goldsworthy
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Einoder, L.
Page, B.
Goldsworthy, S.
author_facet Einoder, L.
Page, B.
Goldsworthy, S.
author_sort Einoder, L.
title Sexual size dimorphism and assortative mating in the short- tailed shearwater puffinus tenuirostris
title_short Sexual size dimorphism and assortative mating in the short- tailed shearwater puffinus tenuirostris
title_full Sexual size dimorphism and assortative mating in the short- tailed shearwater puffinus tenuirostris
title_fullStr Sexual size dimorphism and assortative mating in the short- tailed shearwater puffinus tenuirostris
title_full_unstemmed Sexual size dimorphism and assortative mating in the short- tailed shearwater puffinus tenuirostris
title_sort sexual size dimorphism and assortative mating in the short- tailed shearwater puffinus tenuirostris
publisher African Seabird Group
publishDate 2008
url http://hdl.handle.net/2440/53896
long_lat ENVELOPE(-94.855,-94.855,56.296,56.296)
geographic Luke
geographic_facet Luke
genre Puffinus tenuirostris
genre_facet Puffinus tenuirostris
op_source http://www.marineornithology.org/cgi-bin/getpage.cgi?vol=36&no=2
op_relation Marine Ornithology, 2008; 36(2):167-173
1018-3337
http://hdl.handle.net/2440/53896
_version_ 1766174736414408704