Novel mitochondrial DNA primers for identification of population trends in longnose suckers (Catostomus catostomus) and multispecies identification

The understudied longnose sucker has received no attention by the International Union for Conservation of Nature wherein almost 55 % of fish in this family have been classified as threatened, endangered, extinct, or experiencing population declines. Understanding population trends of the ecologicall...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Conservation Genetics Resources
Main Authors: Langille, B., Perry, R., Keefe, D., Marshall, H.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Springer 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2440/112491
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12686-013-0111-6
id ftunivadelaidedl:oai:digital.library.adelaide.edu.au:2440/112491
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivadelaidedl:oai:digital.library.adelaide.edu.au:2440/112491 2023-12-17T10:28:47+01:00 Novel mitochondrial DNA primers for identification of population trends in longnose suckers (Catostomus catostomus) and multispecies identification Langille, B. Perry, R. Keefe, D. Marshall, H. 2014 http://hdl.handle.net/2440/112491 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12686-013-0111-6 en eng Springer Conservation Genetics Resources, 2014; 6(2):279-281 1877-7252 1877-7260 http://hdl.handle.net/2440/112491 doi:10.1007/s12686-013-0111-6 © Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12686-013-0111-6 Longnose sucker IUCN hybridization cross-species mitochondrial DNA landscape studies Journal article 2014 ftunivadelaidedl https://doi.org/10.1007/s12686-013-0111-6 2023-11-20T23:29:23Z The understudied longnose sucker has received no attention by the International Union for Conservation of Nature wherein almost 55 % of fish in this family have been classified as threatened, endangered, extinct, or experiencing population declines. Understanding population trends of the ecologically diverse longnose sucker is critical for preservation of this unique species, as it hybridizes readily with congenerics. Here we describe three novel pairs of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) primers with which we amplified genes from four species: longnose and white suckers, round whitefish, and slimy sculpin. Nucleotide substitutions ranged from 10 to 111 between individual longnose suckers and among various species. Hybridization may be occurring, as a morphologically identified longnose sucker contained white sucker mtDNA. Species level identification using these primers within a larger scope of landscape studies is possible as these species belong to three orders, showing the utility of these primers on a variety of taxa. Barbara L. Langille, Robert Perry, Donald Keefe, H. Dawn Marshall Article in Journal/Newspaper Catostomus catostomus Longnose sucker Slimy sculpin The University of Adelaide: Digital Library Conservation Genetics Resources 6 2 279 281
institution Open Polar
collection The University of Adelaide: Digital Library
op_collection_id ftunivadelaidedl
language English
topic Longnose sucker
IUCN
hybridization
cross-species
mitochondrial DNA
landscape studies
spellingShingle Longnose sucker
IUCN
hybridization
cross-species
mitochondrial DNA
landscape studies
Langille, B.
Perry, R.
Keefe, D.
Marshall, H.
Novel mitochondrial DNA primers for identification of population trends in longnose suckers (Catostomus catostomus) and multispecies identification
topic_facet Longnose sucker
IUCN
hybridization
cross-species
mitochondrial DNA
landscape studies
description The understudied longnose sucker has received no attention by the International Union for Conservation of Nature wherein almost 55 % of fish in this family have been classified as threatened, endangered, extinct, or experiencing population declines. Understanding population trends of the ecologically diverse longnose sucker is critical for preservation of this unique species, as it hybridizes readily with congenerics. Here we describe three novel pairs of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) primers with which we amplified genes from four species: longnose and white suckers, round whitefish, and slimy sculpin. Nucleotide substitutions ranged from 10 to 111 between individual longnose suckers and among various species. Hybridization may be occurring, as a morphologically identified longnose sucker contained white sucker mtDNA. Species level identification using these primers within a larger scope of landscape studies is possible as these species belong to three orders, showing the utility of these primers on a variety of taxa. Barbara L. Langille, Robert Perry, Donald Keefe, H. Dawn Marshall
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Langille, B.
Perry, R.
Keefe, D.
Marshall, H.
author_facet Langille, B.
Perry, R.
Keefe, D.
Marshall, H.
author_sort Langille, B.
title Novel mitochondrial DNA primers for identification of population trends in longnose suckers (Catostomus catostomus) and multispecies identification
title_short Novel mitochondrial DNA primers for identification of population trends in longnose suckers (Catostomus catostomus) and multispecies identification
title_full Novel mitochondrial DNA primers for identification of population trends in longnose suckers (Catostomus catostomus) and multispecies identification
title_fullStr Novel mitochondrial DNA primers for identification of population trends in longnose suckers (Catostomus catostomus) and multispecies identification
title_full_unstemmed Novel mitochondrial DNA primers for identification of population trends in longnose suckers (Catostomus catostomus) and multispecies identification
title_sort novel mitochondrial dna primers for identification of population trends in longnose suckers (catostomus catostomus) and multispecies identification
publisher Springer
publishDate 2014
url http://hdl.handle.net/2440/112491
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12686-013-0111-6
genre Catostomus catostomus
Longnose sucker
Slimy sculpin
genre_facet Catostomus catostomus
Longnose sucker
Slimy sculpin
op_source http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12686-013-0111-6
op_relation Conservation Genetics Resources, 2014; 6(2):279-281
1877-7252
1877-7260
http://hdl.handle.net/2440/112491
doi:10.1007/s12686-013-0111-6
op_rights © Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1007/s12686-013-0111-6
container_title Conservation Genetics Resources
container_volume 6
container_issue 2
container_start_page 279
op_container_end_page 281
_version_ 1785580965269078016