Modality in Saami-speaking kindergarten and school children
This article examines modal expressions in Saami-speaking kindergarten andschool children aged 4-8 years. The aim is to explore the ways in which childrenuse language to express different types of modality, and to investigate whetherthere are similarities and/or differences between kindergarten chil...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | Northern Sami |
Published: |
Septentrio Academic Publishing
2021
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://septentrio.uit.no/index.php/SDA/article/view/6707 https://doi.org/10.7557/sda.6707 |
_version_ | 1825515162208043008 |
---|---|
author | Johansen Ijäs, Johanna |
author_facet | Johansen Ijäs, Johanna |
author_sort | Johansen Ijäs, Johanna |
collection | University of Tromsø: Septentrio Academic Publishing |
description | This article examines modal expressions in Saami-speaking kindergarten andschool children aged 4-8 years. The aim is to explore the ways in which childrenuse language to express different types of modality, and to investigate whetherthere are similarities and/or differences between kindergarten children and schoolchildren with regard to modal expressions. The study is based on transcripts ofconversations between children and adults about stories containing ethical andmoral dilemmas. The conversations lasted a total of ninety minutes. The results show that the children expressed agent-oriented (deontic anddynamic) modality slightly more than propositional (epistemic and evidential)modality. Modality was generally expressed by verbs; the most frequent verbswere the evidential diehtit (‘to know’) and the deontic, dynamic and epistemicalsáhttit ‘may, can’. Most other verbs were deontic, such as fertet ‘must’, galgat ‘tohave to’ and oažžut ‘to be allowed to’. Particles and adverbs, such as the emphaticgal and oainnat ‘you see’, were commonly used to express epistemic and evidentialmodality. In addition, the children used the construction (ii) leat + lohpi ‘[it] is(not) allowed’ and the imperative mode, both of which express deontic modality,and the evidential noun phrase mu mielas ‘in my opinion’. The data from the school children contained slightly more expressions of modality than the data from the kindergarten children, and the school children also had a few more different ways of expressing modality than the kindergarten children. Artihkal guorahallá modalitehta almmuheami 4–8-jahkásaš mánáidgárdemánáid jaskuvlamánáid gielas. Dutkanmateriála vuođđun leat mánáid ja rávisolbmuid ságastallamat muitalusaid birra main leat ehtalaš ja morálalaš čuolmmat. Ságastallamat biste oktiibuot 1,5 diimmu. Bohtosat čájehit ahte mánát almmuhedje sihke daguide (agent-oriented) ja dieđu doallevašvuođa árvvoštallamii (propositional) guoskevaš modalitehta. Modalitehta almmuhuvvui dábálepmosit vearbbaiguin, earenoamážit diehtit-, ... |
format | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
genre | saami |
genre_facet | saami |
geographic | Gielas |
geographic_facet | Gielas |
id | ftunitroemsoe:oai:ojs.henry.ub.uit.no:article/6707 |
institution | Open Polar |
language | Northern Sami |
long_lat | ENVELOPE(25.866,25.866,70.561,70.561) |
op_collection_id | ftunitroemsoe |
op_doi | https://doi.org/10.7557/sda.670710.7557/sda.2021 |
op_relation | https://septentrio.uit.no/index.php/SDA/article/view/6707/6692 https://septentrio.uit.no/index.php/SDA/article/view/6707 doi:10.7557/sda.6707 |
op_rights | Copyright (c) 2021 Johanna Johansen Ijäs https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
op_source | Sámi dieđalaš áigečála; 2021; 39–71 1894-0498 0805-4312 10.7557/sda.2021 |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Septentrio Academic Publishing |
record_format | openpolar |
spelling | ftunitroemsoe:oai:ojs.henry.ub.uit.no:article/6707 2025-03-02T15:36:38+00:00 Modality in Saami-speaking kindergarten and school children Modalitehta mánáidgárde- ja skuvlamánáid gielas Johansen Ijäs, Johanna 2021-12-30 application/pdf https://septentrio.uit.no/index.php/SDA/article/view/6707 https://doi.org/10.7557/sda.6707 sme sme Septentrio Academic Publishing https://septentrio.uit.no/index.php/SDA/article/view/6707/6692 https://septentrio.uit.no/index.php/SDA/article/view/6707 doi:10.7557/sda.6707 Copyright (c) 2021 Johanna Johansen Ijäs https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 Sámi dieđalaš áigečála; 2021; 39–71 1894-0498 0805-4312 10.7557/sda.2021 modality child language North Saami language kindergarten modalitehta mánáidgiella davvisámegiella mánáidgárdi skuvla info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Peer-reviewed article 2021 ftunitroemsoe https://doi.org/10.7557/sda.670710.7557/sda.2021 2025-02-03T01:25:46Z This article examines modal expressions in Saami-speaking kindergarten andschool children aged 4-8 years. The aim is to explore the ways in which childrenuse language to express different types of modality, and to investigate whetherthere are similarities and/or differences between kindergarten children and schoolchildren with regard to modal expressions. The study is based on transcripts ofconversations between children and adults about stories containing ethical andmoral dilemmas. The conversations lasted a total of ninety minutes. The results show that the children expressed agent-oriented (deontic anddynamic) modality slightly more than propositional (epistemic and evidential)modality. Modality was generally expressed by verbs; the most frequent verbswere the evidential diehtit (‘to know’) and the deontic, dynamic and epistemicalsáhttit ‘may, can’. Most other verbs were deontic, such as fertet ‘must’, galgat ‘tohave to’ and oažžut ‘to be allowed to’. Particles and adverbs, such as the emphaticgal and oainnat ‘you see’, were commonly used to express epistemic and evidentialmodality. In addition, the children used the construction (ii) leat + lohpi ‘[it] is(not) allowed’ and the imperative mode, both of which express deontic modality,and the evidential noun phrase mu mielas ‘in my opinion’. The data from the school children contained slightly more expressions of modality than the data from the kindergarten children, and the school children also had a few more different ways of expressing modality than the kindergarten children. Artihkal guorahallá modalitehta almmuheami 4–8-jahkásaš mánáidgárdemánáid jaskuvlamánáid gielas. Dutkanmateriála vuođđun leat mánáid ja rávisolbmuid ságastallamat muitalusaid birra main leat ehtalaš ja morálalaš čuolmmat. Ságastallamat biste oktiibuot 1,5 diimmu. Bohtosat čájehit ahte mánát almmuhedje sihke daguide (agent-oriented) ja dieđu doallevašvuođa árvvoštallamii (propositional) guoskevaš modalitehta. Modalitehta almmuhuvvui dábálepmosit vearbbaiguin, earenoamážit diehtit-, ... Article in Journal/Newspaper saami University of Tromsø: Septentrio Academic Publishing Gielas ENVELOPE(25.866,25.866,70.561,70.561) |
spellingShingle | modality child language North Saami language kindergarten modalitehta mánáidgiella davvisámegiella mánáidgárdi skuvla Johansen Ijäs, Johanna Modality in Saami-speaking kindergarten and school children |
title | Modality in Saami-speaking kindergarten and school children |
title_full | Modality in Saami-speaking kindergarten and school children |
title_fullStr | Modality in Saami-speaking kindergarten and school children |
title_full_unstemmed | Modality in Saami-speaking kindergarten and school children |
title_short | Modality in Saami-speaking kindergarten and school children |
title_sort | modality in saami-speaking kindergarten and school children |
topic | modality child language North Saami language kindergarten modalitehta mánáidgiella davvisámegiella mánáidgárdi skuvla |
topic_facet | modality child language North Saami language kindergarten modalitehta mánáidgiella davvisámegiella mánáidgárdi skuvla |
url | https://septentrio.uit.no/index.php/SDA/article/view/6707 https://doi.org/10.7557/sda.6707 |