Modality in Saami-speaking kindergarten and school children

This article examines modal expressions in Saami-speaking kindergarten andschool children aged 4-8 years. The aim is to explore the ways in which childrenuse language to express different types of modality, and to investigate whetherthere are similarities and/or differences between kindergarten chil...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Johansen Ijäs, Johanna
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:Northern Sami
Published: Septentrio Academic Publishing 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:https://septentrio.uit.no/index.php/SDA/article/view/6707
https://doi.org/10.7557/sda.6707
_version_ 1825515162208043008
author Johansen Ijäs, Johanna
author_facet Johansen Ijäs, Johanna
author_sort Johansen Ijäs, Johanna
collection University of Tromsø: Septentrio Academic Publishing
description This article examines modal expressions in Saami-speaking kindergarten andschool children aged 4-8 years. The aim is to explore the ways in which childrenuse language to express different types of modality, and to investigate whetherthere are similarities and/or differences between kindergarten children and schoolchildren with regard to modal expressions. The study is based on transcripts ofconversations between children and adults about stories containing ethical andmoral dilemmas. The conversations lasted a total of ninety minutes. The results show that the children expressed agent-oriented (deontic anddynamic) modality slightly more than propositional (epistemic and evidential)modality. Modality was generally expressed by verbs; the most frequent verbswere the evidential diehtit (‘to know’) and the deontic, dynamic and epistemicalsáhttit ‘may, can’. Most other verbs were deontic, such as fertet ‘must’, galgat ‘tohave to’ and oažžut ‘to be allowed to’. Particles and adverbs, such as the emphaticgal and oainnat ‘you see’, were commonly used to express epistemic and evidentialmodality. In addition, the children used the construction (ii) leat + lohpi ‘[it] is(not) allowed’ and the imperative mode, both of which express deontic modality,and the evidential noun phrase mu mielas ‘in my opinion’. The data from the school children contained slightly more expressions of modality than the data from the kindergarten children, and the school children also had a few more different ways of expressing modality than the kindergarten children. Artihkal guorahallá modalitehta almmuheami 4–8-jahkásaš mánáidgárdemánáid jaskuvlamánáid gielas. Dutkanmateriála vuođđun leat mánáid ja rávisolbmuid ságastallamat muitalusaid birra main leat ehtalaš ja morálalaš čuolmmat. Ságastallamat biste oktiibuot 1,5 diimmu. Bohtosat čájehit ahte mánát almmuhedje sihke daguide (agent-oriented) ja dieđu doallevašvuođa árvvoštallamii (propositional) guoskevaš modalitehta. Modalitehta almmuhuvvui dábálepmosit vearbbaiguin, earenoamážit diehtit-, ...
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
genre saami
genre_facet saami
geographic Gielas
geographic_facet Gielas
id ftunitroemsoe:oai:ojs.henry.ub.uit.no:article/6707
institution Open Polar
language Northern Sami
long_lat ENVELOPE(25.866,25.866,70.561,70.561)
op_collection_id ftunitroemsoe
op_doi https://doi.org/10.7557/sda.670710.7557/sda.2021
op_relation https://septentrio.uit.no/index.php/SDA/article/view/6707/6692
https://septentrio.uit.no/index.php/SDA/article/view/6707
doi:10.7557/sda.6707
op_rights Copyright (c) 2021 Johanna Johansen Ijäs
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
op_source Sámi dieđalaš áigečála; 2021; 39–71
1894-0498
0805-4312
10.7557/sda.2021
publishDate 2021
publisher Septentrio Academic Publishing
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunitroemsoe:oai:ojs.henry.ub.uit.no:article/6707 2025-03-02T15:36:38+00:00 Modality in Saami-speaking kindergarten and school children Modalitehta mánáidgárde- ja skuvlamánáid gielas Johansen Ijäs, Johanna 2021-12-30 application/pdf https://septentrio.uit.no/index.php/SDA/article/view/6707 https://doi.org/10.7557/sda.6707 sme sme Septentrio Academic Publishing https://septentrio.uit.no/index.php/SDA/article/view/6707/6692 https://septentrio.uit.no/index.php/SDA/article/view/6707 doi:10.7557/sda.6707 Copyright (c) 2021 Johanna Johansen Ijäs https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 Sámi dieđalaš áigečála; 2021; 39–71 1894-0498 0805-4312 10.7557/sda.2021 modality child language North Saami language kindergarten modalitehta mánáidgiella davvisámegiella mánáidgárdi skuvla info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Peer-reviewed article 2021 ftunitroemsoe https://doi.org/10.7557/sda.670710.7557/sda.2021 2025-02-03T01:25:46Z This article examines modal expressions in Saami-speaking kindergarten andschool children aged 4-8 years. The aim is to explore the ways in which childrenuse language to express different types of modality, and to investigate whetherthere are similarities and/or differences between kindergarten children and schoolchildren with regard to modal expressions. The study is based on transcripts ofconversations between children and adults about stories containing ethical andmoral dilemmas. The conversations lasted a total of ninety minutes. The results show that the children expressed agent-oriented (deontic anddynamic) modality slightly more than propositional (epistemic and evidential)modality. Modality was generally expressed by verbs; the most frequent verbswere the evidential diehtit (‘to know’) and the deontic, dynamic and epistemicalsáhttit ‘may, can’. Most other verbs were deontic, such as fertet ‘must’, galgat ‘tohave to’ and oažžut ‘to be allowed to’. Particles and adverbs, such as the emphaticgal and oainnat ‘you see’, were commonly used to express epistemic and evidentialmodality. In addition, the children used the construction (ii) leat + lohpi ‘[it] is(not) allowed’ and the imperative mode, both of which express deontic modality,and the evidential noun phrase mu mielas ‘in my opinion’. The data from the school children contained slightly more expressions of modality than the data from the kindergarten children, and the school children also had a few more different ways of expressing modality than the kindergarten children. Artihkal guorahallá modalitehta almmuheami 4–8-jahkásaš mánáidgárdemánáid jaskuvlamánáid gielas. Dutkanmateriála vuođđun leat mánáid ja rávisolbmuid ságastallamat muitalusaid birra main leat ehtalaš ja morálalaš čuolmmat. Ságastallamat biste oktiibuot 1,5 diimmu. Bohtosat čájehit ahte mánát almmuhedje sihke daguide (agent-oriented) ja dieđu doallevašvuođa árvvoštallamii (propositional) guoskevaš modalitehta. Modalitehta almmuhuvvui dábálepmosit vearbbaiguin, earenoamážit diehtit-, ... Article in Journal/Newspaper saami University of Tromsø: Septentrio Academic Publishing Gielas ENVELOPE(25.866,25.866,70.561,70.561)
spellingShingle modality
child language
North Saami language
kindergarten
modalitehta
mánáidgiella
davvisámegiella
mánáidgárdi
skuvla
Johansen Ijäs, Johanna
Modality in Saami-speaking kindergarten and school children
title Modality in Saami-speaking kindergarten and school children
title_full Modality in Saami-speaking kindergarten and school children
title_fullStr Modality in Saami-speaking kindergarten and school children
title_full_unstemmed Modality in Saami-speaking kindergarten and school children
title_short Modality in Saami-speaking kindergarten and school children
title_sort modality in saami-speaking kindergarten and school children
topic modality
child language
North Saami language
kindergarten
modalitehta
mánáidgiella
davvisámegiella
mánáidgárdi
skuvla
topic_facet modality
child language
North Saami language
kindergarten
modalitehta
mánáidgiella
davvisámegiella
mánáidgárdi
skuvla
url https://septentrio.uit.no/index.php/SDA/article/view/6707
https://doi.org/10.7557/sda.6707