Woodland caribou and forestry in Northern Ontario, Canada
Expansion of logging in remote Ontario boreal forest requires mitigation of effects on woodland caribou. Three examples of caribou-forestry interaction are reviewed. In two, caribou were apparently displaced from peripheral portions of their winter range by logging. In the third, caribou disappeared...
Published in: | Rangifer |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Septentrio Academic Publishing
1986
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://septentrio.uit.no/index.php/rangifer/article/view/587 https://doi.org/10.7557/2.6.2.587 |
_version_ | 1821690626728525824 |
---|---|
author | Darby, W. R. Duquette, L. S. |
author_facet | Darby, W. R. Duquette, L. S. |
author_sort | Darby, W. R. |
collection | University of Tromsø: Septentrio Academic Publishing |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 87 |
container_title | Rangifer |
container_volume | 6 |
description | Expansion of logging in remote Ontario boreal forest requires mitigation of effects on woodland caribou. Three examples of caribou-forestry interaction are reviewed. In two, caribou were apparently displaced from peripheral portions of their winter range by logging. In the third, caribou disappeared when exposed to: logging in a central third of their winter range; increased deer density, and; a probable increase in predation. In all cases there is no evidence of human harvest. The literature plus experience in Ontario suggest the following mitigative techniques: protection of winter concentration areas, significant calving areas and traditional migration routes from logging; directing timber harvest to forest stands of least value to caribou; restricting disturbance to one large clearcut in a peripheral portion of range rather than dispersing it over a large portion as several small clearcuts; modified site preparation and regeneration, and; restricted road access. Research is required on the effect of forestry on caribou with and without mitigation, and on causes for effects observed. |
format | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
genre | Rangifer |
genre_facet | Rangifer |
geographic | Canada |
geographic_facet | Canada |
id | ftunitroemsoe:oai:ojs.henry.ub.uit.no:article/587 |
institution | Open Polar |
language | English |
op_collection_id | ftunitroemsoe |
op_doi | https://doi.org/10.7557/2.6.2.587 |
op_relation | https://septentrio.uit.no/index.php/rangifer/article/view/587/557 https://septentrio.uit.no/index.php/rangifer/article/view/587 doi:10.7557/2.6.2.587 |
op_rights | Copyright (c) 2015 W. R. Darby, L. S. Duquette |
op_source | Rangifer; Vol 6 (1986): Special Issue No. 1; 87-93 1890-6729 |
publishDate | 1986 |
publisher | Septentrio Academic Publishing |
record_format | openpolar |
spelling | ftunitroemsoe:oai:ojs.henry.ub.uit.no:article/587 2025-01-17T00:25:22+00:00 Woodland caribou and forestry in Northern Ontario, Canada Darby, W. R. Duquette, L. S. 1986-06-01 application/pdf https://septentrio.uit.no/index.php/rangifer/article/view/587 https://doi.org/10.7557/2.6.2.587 eng eng Septentrio Academic Publishing https://septentrio.uit.no/index.php/rangifer/article/view/587/557 https://septentrio.uit.no/index.php/rangifer/article/view/587 doi:10.7557/2.6.2.587 Copyright (c) 2015 W. R. Darby, L. S. Duquette Rangifer; Vol 6 (1986): Special Issue No. 1; 87-93 1890-6729 caribou decline forestry mitigation Canada Ontario info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion 1986 ftunitroemsoe https://doi.org/10.7557/2.6.2.587 2024-12-20T01:00:39Z Expansion of logging in remote Ontario boreal forest requires mitigation of effects on woodland caribou. Three examples of caribou-forestry interaction are reviewed. In two, caribou were apparently displaced from peripheral portions of their winter range by logging. In the third, caribou disappeared when exposed to: logging in a central third of their winter range; increased deer density, and; a probable increase in predation. In all cases there is no evidence of human harvest. The literature plus experience in Ontario suggest the following mitigative techniques: protection of winter concentration areas, significant calving areas and traditional migration routes from logging; directing timber harvest to forest stands of least value to caribou; restricting disturbance to one large clearcut in a peripheral portion of range rather than dispersing it over a large portion as several small clearcuts; modified site preparation and regeneration, and; restricted road access. Research is required on the effect of forestry on caribou with and without mitigation, and on causes for effects observed. Article in Journal/Newspaper Rangifer University of Tromsø: Septentrio Academic Publishing Canada Rangifer 6 2 87 |
spellingShingle | caribou decline forestry mitigation Canada Ontario Darby, W. R. Duquette, L. S. Woodland caribou and forestry in Northern Ontario, Canada |
title | Woodland caribou and forestry in Northern Ontario, Canada |
title_full | Woodland caribou and forestry in Northern Ontario, Canada |
title_fullStr | Woodland caribou and forestry in Northern Ontario, Canada |
title_full_unstemmed | Woodland caribou and forestry in Northern Ontario, Canada |
title_short | Woodland caribou and forestry in Northern Ontario, Canada |
title_sort | woodland caribou and forestry in northern ontario, canada |
topic | caribou decline forestry mitigation Canada Ontario |
topic_facet | caribou decline forestry mitigation Canada Ontario |
url | https://septentrio.uit.no/index.php/rangifer/article/view/587 https://doi.org/10.7557/2.6.2.587 |