Woodland caribou and forestry in Northern Ontario, Canada
Expansion of logging in remote Ontario boreal forest requires mitigation of effects on woodland caribou. Three examples of caribou-forestry interaction are reviewed. In two, caribou were apparently displaced from peripheral portions of their winter range by logging. In the third, caribou disappeared...
Published in: | Rangifer |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Septentrio Academic Publishing
1986
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://septentrio.uit.no/index.php/rangifer/article/view/587 https://doi.org/10.7557/2.6.2.587 |
id |
ftunitroemsoe:oai:ojs.henry.ub.uit.no:article/587 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftunitroemsoe:oai:ojs.henry.ub.uit.no:article/587 2023-05-15T18:03:55+02:00 Woodland caribou and forestry in Northern Ontario, Canada Darby, W. R. Duquette, L. S. 1986-06-01 application/pdf https://septentrio.uit.no/index.php/rangifer/article/view/587 https://doi.org/10.7557/2.6.2.587 eng eng Septentrio Academic Publishing https://septentrio.uit.no/index.php/rangifer/article/view/587/557 https://septentrio.uit.no/index.php/rangifer/article/view/587 doi:10.7557/2.6.2.587 Copyright (c) 2015 W. R. Darby, L. S. Duquette http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ CC-BY Rangifer; Vol 6 (1986): Special Issue No. 1; 87-93 1890-6729 caribou decline forestry mitigation Canada Ontario info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion 1986 ftunitroemsoe https://doi.org/10.7557/2.6.2.587 2021-08-16T14:31:01Z Expansion of logging in remote Ontario boreal forest requires mitigation of effects on woodland caribou. Three examples of caribou-forestry interaction are reviewed. In two, caribou were apparently displaced from peripheral portions of their winter range by logging. In the third, caribou disappeared when exposed to: logging in a central third of their winter range; increased deer density, and; a probable increase in predation. In all cases there is no evidence of human harvest. The literature plus experience in Ontario suggest the following mitigative techniques: protection of winter concentration areas, significant calving areas and traditional migration routes from logging; directing timber harvest to forest stands of least value to caribou; restricting disturbance to one large clearcut in a peripheral portion of range rather than dispersing it over a large portion as several small clearcuts; modified site preparation and regeneration, and; restricted road access. Research is required on the effect of forestry on caribou with and without mitigation, and on causes for effects observed. Article in Journal/Newspaper Rangifer University of Tromsø: Septentrio Academic Publishing Canada Rangifer 6 2 87 |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
University of Tromsø: Septentrio Academic Publishing |
op_collection_id |
ftunitroemsoe |
language |
English |
topic |
caribou decline forestry mitigation Canada Ontario |
spellingShingle |
caribou decline forestry mitigation Canada Ontario Darby, W. R. Duquette, L. S. Woodland caribou and forestry in Northern Ontario, Canada |
topic_facet |
caribou decline forestry mitigation Canada Ontario |
description |
Expansion of logging in remote Ontario boreal forest requires mitigation of effects on woodland caribou. Three examples of caribou-forestry interaction are reviewed. In two, caribou were apparently displaced from peripheral portions of their winter range by logging. In the third, caribou disappeared when exposed to: logging in a central third of their winter range; increased deer density, and; a probable increase in predation. In all cases there is no evidence of human harvest. The literature plus experience in Ontario suggest the following mitigative techniques: protection of winter concentration areas, significant calving areas and traditional migration routes from logging; directing timber harvest to forest stands of least value to caribou; restricting disturbance to one large clearcut in a peripheral portion of range rather than dispersing it over a large portion as several small clearcuts; modified site preparation and regeneration, and; restricted road access. Research is required on the effect of forestry on caribou with and without mitigation, and on causes for effects observed. |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Darby, W. R. Duquette, L. S. |
author_facet |
Darby, W. R. Duquette, L. S. |
author_sort |
Darby, W. R. |
title |
Woodland caribou and forestry in Northern Ontario, Canada |
title_short |
Woodland caribou and forestry in Northern Ontario, Canada |
title_full |
Woodland caribou and forestry in Northern Ontario, Canada |
title_fullStr |
Woodland caribou and forestry in Northern Ontario, Canada |
title_full_unstemmed |
Woodland caribou and forestry in Northern Ontario, Canada |
title_sort |
woodland caribou and forestry in northern ontario, canada |
publisher |
Septentrio Academic Publishing |
publishDate |
1986 |
url |
https://septentrio.uit.no/index.php/rangifer/article/view/587 https://doi.org/10.7557/2.6.2.587 |
geographic |
Canada |
geographic_facet |
Canada |
genre |
Rangifer |
genre_facet |
Rangifer |
op_source |
Rangifer; Vol 6 (1986): Special Issue No. 1; 87-93 1890-6729 |
op_relation |
https://septentrio.uit.no/index.php/rangifer/article/view/587/557 https://septentrio.uit.no/index.php/rangifer/article/view/587 doi:10.7557/2.6.2.587 |
op_rights |
Copyright (c) 2015 W. R. Darby, L. S. Duquette http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ |
op_rightsnorm |
CC-BY |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.7557/2.6.2.587 |
container_title |
Rangifer |
container_volume |
6 |
container_issue |
2 |
container_start_page |
87 |
_version_ |
1766175077746868224 |