Woodland caribou and forestry in Northern Ontario, Canada

Expansion of logging in remote Ontario boreal forest requires mitigation of effects on woodland caribou. Three examples of caribou-forestry interaction are reviewed. In two, caribou were apparently displaced from peripheral portions of their winter range by logging. In the third, caribou disappeared...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Rangifer
Main Authors: Darby, W. R., Duquette, L. S.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Septentrio Academic Publishing 1986
Subjects:
Online Access:https://septentrio.uit.no/index.php/rangifer/article/view/587
https://doi.org/10.7557/2.6.2.587
id ftunitroemsoe:oai:ojs.henry.ub.uit.no:article/587
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunitroemsoe:oai:ojs.henry.ub.uit.no:article/587 2023-05-15T18:03:55+02:00 Woodland caribou and forestry in Northern Ontario, Canada Darby, W. R. Duquette, L. S. 1986-06-01 application/pdf https://septentrio.uit.no/index.php/rangifer/article/view/587 https://doi.org/10.7557/2.6.2.587 eng eng Septentrio Academic Publishing https://septentrio.uit.no/index.php/rangifer/article/view/587/557 https://septentrio.uit.no/index.php/rangifer/article/view/587 doi:10.7557/2.6.2.587 Copyright (c) 2015 W. R. Darby, L. S. Duquette http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ CC-BY Rangifer; Vol 6 (1986): Special Issue No. 1; 87-93 1890-6729 caribou decline forestry mitigation Canada Ontario info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion 1986 ftunitroemsoe https://doi.org/10.7557/2.6.2.587 2021-08-16T14:31:01Z Expansion of logging in remote Ontario boreal forest requires mitigation of effects on woodland caribou. Three examples of caribou-forestry interaction are reviewed. In two, caribou were apparently displaced from peripheral portions of their winter range by logging. In the third, caribou disappeared when exposed to: logging in a central third of their winter range; increased deer density, and; a probable increase in predation. In all cases there is no evidence of human harvest. The literature plus experience in Ontario suggest the following mitigative techniques: protection of winter concentration areas, significant calving areas and traditional migration routes from logging; directing timber harvest to forest stands of least value to caribou; restricting disturbance to one large clearcut in a peripheral portion of range rather than dispersing it over a large portion as several small clearcuts; modified site preparation and regeneration, and; restricted road access. Research is required on the effect of forestry on caribou with and without mitigation, and on causes for effects observed. Article in Journal/Newspaper Rangifer University of Tromsø: Septentrio Academic Publishing Canada Rangifer 6 2 87
institution Open Polar
collection University of Tromsø: Septentrio Academic Publishing
op_collection_id ftunitroemsoe
language English
topic caribou
decline
forestry
mitigation
Canada
Ontario
spellingShingle caribou
decline
forestry
mitigation
Canada
Ontario
Darby, W. R.
Duquette, L. S.
Woodland caribou and forestry in Northern Ontario, Canada
topic_facet caribou
decline
forestry
mitigation
Canada
Ontario
description Expansion of logging in remote Ontario boreal forest requires mitigation of effects on woodland caribou. Three examples of caribou-forestry interaction are reviewed. In two, caribou were apparently displaced from peripheral portions of their winter range by logging. In the third, caribou disappeared when exposed to: logging in a central third of their winter range; increased deer density, and; a probable increase in predation. In all cases there is no evidence of human harvest. The literature plus experience in Ontario suggest the following mitigative techniques: protection of winter concentration areas, significant calving areas and traditional migration routes from logging; directing timber harvest to forest stands of least value to caribou; restricting disturbance to one large clearcut in a peripheral portion of range rather than dispersing it over a large portion as several small clearcuts; modified site preparation and regeneration, and; restricted road access. Research is required on the effect of forestry on caribou with and without mitigation, and on causes for effects observed.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Darby, W. R.
Duquette, L. S.
author_facet Darby, W. R.
Duquette, L. S.
author_sort Darby, W. R.
title Woodland caribou and forestry in Northern Ontario, Canada
title_short Woodland caribou and forestry in Northern Ontario, Canada
title_full Woodland caribou and forestry in Northern Ontario, Canada
title_fullStr Woodland caribou and forestry in Northern Ontario, Canada
title_full_unstemmed Woodland caribou and forestry in Northern Ontario, Canada
title_sort woodland caribou and forestry in northern ontario, canada
publisher Septentrio Academic Publishing
publishDate 1986
url https://septentrio.uit.no/index.php/rangifer/article/view/587
https://doi.org/10.7557/2.6.2.587
geographic Canada
geographic_facet Canada
genre Rangifer
genre_facet Rangifer
op_source Rangifer; Vol 6 (1986): Special Issue No. 1; 87-93
1890-6729
op_relation https://septentrio.uit.no/index.php/rangifer/article/view/587/557
https://septentrio.uit.no/index.php/rangifer/article/view/587
doi:10.7557/2.6.2.587
op_rights Copyright (c) 2015 W. R. Darby, L. S. Duquette
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
op_rightsnorm CC-BY
op_doi https://doi.org/10.7557/2.6.2.587
container_title Rangifer
container_volume 6
container_issue 2
container_start_page 87
_version_ 1766175077746868224