Arctic Borderlands Ecological Knowledge Cooperative: can local knowledge inform caribou management?

While quantitative analyses have traditionally been used to measure overall caribou herd health, qualitative observational data can also provide timely information that reflects what people on the land are observing. The Arctic Borderlands Ecological Knowledge Co-op (ABEKC) monitors ecological chang...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Rangifer
Main Authors: Russell, Don E., Svoboda, Michael Y., Arokium, Jadah, Cooley, Dorothy
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Septentrio Academic Publishing 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:https://septentrio.uit.no/index.php/rangifer/article/view/2530
https://doi.org/10.7557/2.33.2.2530
_version_ 1821828404971831296
author Russell, Don E.
Svoboda, Michael Y.
Arokium, Jadah
Cooley, Dorothy
author_facet Russell, Don E.
Svoboda, Michael Y.
Arokium, Jadah
Cooley, Dorothy
author_sort Russell, Don E.
collection University of Tromsø: Septentrio Academic Publishing
container_issue 2
container_start_page 71
container_title Rangifer
container_volume 33
description While quantitative analyses have traditionally been used to measure overall caribou herd health, qualitative observational data can also provide timely information that reflects what people on the land are observing. The Arctic Borderlands Ecological Knowledge Co-op (ABEKC) monitors ecological change in the range of the Porcupine Caribou Herd (PCH). The community-based monitoring component of the Co-op’s mandate involves the gathering of local knowledge through interviews with local experts in a number of communities.We analyzed the responses to interviews collected during 2000–2007 related to caribou availability, harvest success, meeting needs and caribou health during fall and spring. Interviews revealed 1) caribou greater availability during the survey period, 2) an increasing trend in the proportion of harvesters that met their needs 3) no trend in animals harvested or proportion of successful hunters and 4) improving overall caribou health throughout the period.There was no population estimate for the herd between 2001 and 2010. In 2001, 123,000 caribou were estimated in the herd. Based on an estimated 178,000 in 1989, a declining trend of ~ 3% annually occurred at least until 2001. In the interim agencies and boards feared the herd continued to decline and worked towards and finalized a Harvest Management Plan for the herd. In contrast, from the Co-op interviews all indications suggested improving herd conditions throughout most of the decade. A successful survey in 2010 determined the herd had grown to 169,000 animals. We conclude that the community-based interviews provided a valid, unique information source to better understand caribou ecology and express community perceptions of overall herd status and could provide a valuable contribution to management decision making. We recommend that ABEKC results become standard input into Porcupine Caribou harvest management decisions and serve as a model of integrating community based monitoring data into resource management decision making throughout the north.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
genre Arctic
Rangifer
genre_facet Arctic
Rangifer
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
id ftunitroemsoe:oai:ojs.henry.ub.uit.no:article/2530
institution Open Polar
language English
op_collection_id ftunitroemsoe
op_doi https://doi.org/10.7557/2.33.2.2530
op_relation https://septentrio.uit.no/index.php/rangifer/article/view/2530/3301
https://septentrio.uit.no/index.php/rangifer/article/view/2530
doi:10.7557/2.33.2.2530
op_rights Copyright (c) 2015 Don E. Russell, Michael Y. Svoboda, Jadah Arokium, Dorothy Cooley
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
op_rightsnorm CC-BY
op_source Rangifer; Vol 33 (2013): Special Issue No. 21; 71-78
1890-6729
publishDate 2013
publisher Septentrio Academic Publishing
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunitroemsoe:oai:ojs.henry.ub.uit.no:article/2530 2025-01-16T20:33:19+00:00 Arctic Borderlands Ecological Knowledge Cooperative: can local knowledge inform caribou management? Russell, Don E. Svoboda, Michael Y. Arokium, Jadah Cooley, Dorothy 2013-06-01 application/pdf https://septentrio.uit.no/index.php/rangifer/article/view/2530 https://doi.org/10.7557/2.33.2.2530 eng eng Septentrio Academic Publishing https://septentrio.uit.no/index.php/rangifer/article/view/2530/3301 https://septentrio.uit.no/index.php/rangifer/article/view/2530 doi:10.7557/2.33.2.2530 Copyright (c) 2015 Don E. Russell, Michael Y. Svoboda, Jadah Arokium, Dorothy Cooley http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ CC-BY Rangifer; Vol 33 (2013): Special Issue No. 21; 71-78 1890-6729 caribou community interviews harvest local knowledge info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion 2013 ftunitroemsoe https://doi.org/10.7557/2.33.2.2530 2021-08-16T15:12:39Z While quantitative analyses have traditionally been used to measure overall caribou herd health, qualitative observational data can also provide timely information that reflects what people on the land are observing. The Arctic Borderlands Ecological Knowledge Co-op (ABEKC) monitors ecological change in the range of the Porcupine Caribou Herd (PCH). The community-based monitoring component of the Co-op’s mandate involves the gathering of local knowledge through interviews with local experts in a number of communities.We analyzed the responses to interviews collected during 2000–2007 related to caribou availability, harvest success, meeting needs and caribou health during fall and spring. Interviews revealed 1) caribou greater availability during the survey period, 2) an increasing trend in the proportion of harvesters that met their needs 3) no trend in animals harvested or proportion of successful hunters and 4) improving overall caribou health throughout the period.There was no population estimate for the herd between 2001 and 2010. In 2001, 123,000 caribou were estimated in the herd. Based on an estimated 178,000 in 1989, a declining trend of ~ 3% annually occurred at least until 2001. In the interim agencies and boards feared the herd continued to decline and worked towards and finalized a Harvest Management Plan for the herd. In contrast, from the Co-op interviews all indications suggested improving herd conditions throughout most of the decade. A successful survey in 2010 determined the herd had grown to 169,000 animals. We conclude that the community-based interviews provided a valid, unique information source to better understand caribou ecology and express community perceptions of overall herd status and could provide a valuable contribution to management decision making. We recommend that ABEKC results become standard input into Porcupine Caribou harvest management decisions and serve as a model of integrating community based monitoring data into resource management decision making throughout the north. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Rangifer University of Tromsø: Septentrio Academic Publishing Arctic Rangifer 33 2 71
spellingShingle caribou
community interviews
harvest
local knowledge
Russell, Don E.
Svoboda, Michael Y.
Arokium, Jadah
Cooley, Dorothy
Arctic Borderlands Ecological Knowledge Cooperative: can local knowledge inform caribou management?
title Arctic Borderlands Ecological Knowledge Cooperative: can local knowledge inform caribou management?
title_full Arctic Borderlands Ecological Knowledge Cooperative: can local knowledge inform caribou management?
title_fullStr Arctic Borderlands Ecological Knowledge Cooperative: can local knowledge inform caribou management?
title_full_unstemmed Arctic Borderlands Ecological Knowledge Cooperative: can local knowledge inform caribou management?
title_short Arctic Borderlands Ecological Knowledge Cooperative: can local knowledge inform caribou management?
title_sort arctic borderlands ecological knowledge cooperative: can local knowledge inform caribou management?
topic caribou
community interviews
harvest
local knowledge
topic_facet caribou
community interviews
harvest
local knowledge
url https://septentrio.uit.no/index.php/rangifer/article/view/2530
https://doi.org/10.7557/2.33.2.2530