Norge og EU – partnere i Arktis

This article raises three main questions: (i) What characterizes the EEC/EU's relationship to the Arctic? (ii) What issues/areas have caused problems for the EU in becoming a more relevant actor in the Arctic? (iii) To what degree has Norway been able to exert influence on the Union's ongo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Nordlit
Main Author: Wegge, Njord
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:Norwegian
Published: Septentrio Academic Publishing 2012
Subjects:
EU
Online Access:https://septentrio.uit.no/index.php/nordlit/article/view/2308
https://doi.org/10.7557/13.2308
id ftunitroemsoe:oai:ojs.henry.ub.uit.no:article/2308
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunitroemsoe:oai:ojs.henry.ub.uit.no:article/2308 2023-05-15T14:30:51+02:00 Norge og EU – partnere i Arktis Wegge, Njord 2012-05-01 application/pdf https://septentrio.uit.no/index.php/nordlit/article/view/2308 https://doi.org/10.7557/13.2308 nor nor Septentrio Academic Publishing https://septentrio.uit.no/index.php/nordlit/article/view/2308/2138 https://septentrio.uit.no/index.php/nordlit/article/view/2308 doi:10.7557/13.2308 Copyright (c) 2012 Njord Wegge http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ CC-BY Nordlit; No 29 (2012): Narrating the High North I; 129-138 Nordlit; Nr 29 (2012): Narrating the High North I; 129-138 1503-2086 0809-1668 EU Norge Arktis arktisk politikk info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Peer-reviewed article Fagfellevurdert artikkel 2012 ftunitroemsoe https://doi.org/10.7557/13.2308 2021-08-16T15:46:02Z This article raises three main questions: (i) What characterizes the EEC/EU's relationship to the Arctic? (ii) What issues/areas have caused problems for the EU in becoming a more relevant actor in the Arctic? (iii) To what degree has Norway been able to exert influence on the Union's ongoing Arctic policy development? By chronologically reviewing the EEC/EU's relationship to the Arctic the article demonstrates that the intensity and interest for the Northern region has varied dramatically from great interest to near ignorance. While the Greenlandic population in 1982, due to cultural and economic disputes, left the EEC, the Union's most recent challenges with respect to becoming a relevant actor in the Arctic has concerned disagreements with some of the Arctic states. These disputes have primarily included discord on 1. The Law of the seas' role in the Arctic, 2. the EU's desire to become a permanent observer in the Arctic Council and finally, 3. The EU's ban on seal products in the Common market. The article concludes by describing how Norway has been one, if not the most, important Arctic state for the Union, and that Norway has benefitted from a cooperative approach towards the EU. The cooperative approach has indirectly given Norway an opportunity to influence the outcome of the EU's Arctic policy. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Council Arctic Arktis Arktis* greenlandic University of Tromsø: Septentrio Academic Publishing Arctic Norway Nordlit 16 1 129
institution Open Polar
collection University of Tromsø: Septentrio Academic Publishing
op_collection_id ftunitroemsoe
language Norwegian
topic EU
Norge
Arktis
arktisk politikk
spellingShingle EU
Norge
Arktis
arktisk politikk
Wegge, Njord
Norge og EU – partnere i Arktis
topic_facet EU
Norge
Arktis
arktisk politikk
description This article raises three main questions: (i) What characterizes the EEC/EU's relationship to the Arctic? (ii) What issues/areas have caused problems for the EU in becoming a more relevant actor in the Arctic? (iii) To what degree has Norway been able to exert influence on the Union's ongoing Arctic policy development? By chronologically reviewing the EEC/EU's relationship to the Arctic the article demonstrates that the intensity and interest for the Northern region has varied dramatically from great interest to near ignorance. While the Greenlandic population in 1982, due to cultural and economic disputes, left the EEC, the Union's most recent challenges with respect to becoming a relevant actor in the Arctic has concerned disagreements with some of the Arctic states. These disputes have primarily included discord on 1. The Law of the seas' role in the Arctic, 2. the EU's desire to become a permanent observer in the Arctic Council and finally, 3. The EU's ban on seal products in the Common market. The article concludes by describing how Norway has been one, if not the most, important Arctic state for the Union, and that Norway has benefitted from a cooperative approach towards the EU. The cooperative approach has indirectly given Norway an opportunity to influence the outcome of the EU's Arctic policy.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Wegge, Njord
author_facet Wegge, Njord
author_sort Wegge, Njord
title Norge og EU – partnere i Arktis
title_short Norge og EU – partnere i Arktis
title_full Norge og EU – partnere i Arktis
title_fullStr Norge og EU – partnere i Arktis
title_full_unstemmed Norge og EU – partnere i Arktis
title_sort norge og eu – partnere i arktis
publisher Septentrio Academic Publishing
publishDate 2012
url https://septentrio.uit.no/index.php/nordlit/article/view/2308
https://doi.org/10.7557/13.2308
geographic Arctic
Norway
geographic_facet Arctic
Norway
genre Arctic Council
Arctic
Arktis
Arktis*
greenlandic
genre_facet Arctic Council
Arctic
Arktis
Arktis*
greenlandic
op_source Nordlit; No 29 (2012): Narrating the High North I; 129-138
Nordlit; Nr 29 (2012): Narrating the High North I; 129-138
1503-2086
0809-1668
op_relation https://septentrio.uit.no/index.php/nordlit/article/view/2308/2138
https://septentrio.uit.no/index.php/nordlit/article/view/2308
doi:10.7557/13.2308
op_rights Copyright (c) 2012 Njord Wegge
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
op_rightsnorm CC-BY
op_doi https://doi.org/10.7557/13.2308
container_title Nordlit
container_volume 16
container_issue 1
container_start_page 129
_version_ 1766304641356660736