Reindeer avoidance of pasture contaminated with sheep and reindeer faeces

Contamination by excrements will increase in areas with high animal densities, such as snow free patches with accessible forage in winter and holding paddocks. Avoidance of faeces dropped by other grazers may result in interference competition by reducing optimal forage intake, or offer protection f...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Rangifer
Main Authors: Colman, Jonathan E., Storlien, Svein, Moe, Stein R., Holand, Øystein, Reimers, Eigil
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Septentrio Academic Publishing 2003
Subjects:
Online Access:https://septentrio.uit.no/index.php/rangifer/article/view/1716
https://doi.org/10.7557/2.23.5.1716
id ftunitroemsoe:oai:ojs.henry.ub.uit.no:article/1716
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunitroemsoe:oai:ojs.henry.ub.uit.no:article/1716 2023-05-15T18:03:55+02:00 Reindeer avoidance of pasture contaminated with sheep and reindeer faeces Colman, Jonathan E. Storlien, Svein Moe, Stein R. Holand, Øystein Reimers, Eigil 2003-04-01 application/pdf https://septentrio.uit.no/index.php/rangifer/article/view/1716 https://doi.org/10.7557/2.23.5.1716 eng eng Septentrio Academic Publishing https://septentrio.uit.no/index.php/rangifer/article/view/1716/1602 https://septentrio.uit.no/index.php/rangifer/article/view/1716 doi:10.7557/2.23.5.1716 Copyright (c) 2015 Jonathan E. Colman, Svein Storlien, Stein R. Moe, Øystein Holand, Eigil Reimers http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ CC-BY Rangifer; Vol 23 (2003): Special Issue No. 14; 313-320 1890-6729 reindeer habitat use competition faeces distribution grazing spatial overlap sympatric ruminants parasite aversion pasture contamination info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion 2003 ftunitroemsoe https://doi.org/10.7557/2.23.5.1716 2021-08-16T15:06:01Z Contamination by excrements will increase in areas with high animal densities, such as snow free patches with accessible forage in winter and holding paddocks. Avoidance of faeces dropped by other grazers may result in interference competition by reducing optimal forage intake, or offer protection from the transfer of parasites or disease. We conducted two enclosure experiments investigating reindeer (Rangifer tarandus) reactions towards faeces. The first experiment tested whether reindeer avoid pasture contaminated with faeces from reindeer or sheep (Ovis aries). Both high (0.5 kg/m2) and low (0.05 kg/m2) concentrations of faeces reduced reindeer grazing compared to no faeces. Reindeer grazed significantly less in areas with high concentration of faeces compared to areas with low concentrations, with equally strong avoidance regardless of faeces source. The second experiment analysed the defecation pattern (random or not) of reindeer in a 50 m x 40 m enclosure to investigate how this pattern might change following the introduction of female sheep or additional female reindeer. Both reindeer and sheep defecated in a non-random pattern that was related to their preferred bedding sites. When sheep visited reindeer, the species' faeces distributions were positively correlated, indicating that reindeer and sheep had an overlap in area utilization, at least while bedding. When additional reindeer were introduced and then removed, the combined resident and visiting reindeers' faeces distributions were negatively correlated with the resident reindeers' faeces distribution following the removal of the visiting reindeer. This suggested that resident reindeer avoided the visiting reindeers' faeces. Resident reindeer also produced fewer total droppings when visited by new reindeer, while the number of droppings did not change when visited by sheep. Thus, resident reindeer were more adversely affected by the introduction of new reindeer even after their removal than by the introduction of sheep. In conclusion, the amount and distribution of excrements will play an important role in reindeer grazing and area use in pastures maintaining high densities of reindeer or reindeer and sheep. Article in Journal/Newspaper Rangifer Rangifer tarandus University of Tromsø: Septentrio Academic Publishing Rangifer 23 5 313
institution Open Polar
collection University of Tromsø: Septentrio Academic Publishing
op_collection_id ftunitroemsoe
language English
topic reindeer
habitat use
competition
faeces distribution
grazing
spatial overlap
sympatric ruminants
parasite aversion
pasture contamination
spellingShingle reindeer
habitat use
competition
faeces distribution
grazing
spatial overlap
sympatric ruminants
parasite aversion
pasture contamination
Colman, Jonathan E.
Storlien, Svein
Moe, Stein R.
Holand, Øystein
Reimers, Eigil
Reindeer avoidance of pasture contaminated with sheep and reindeer faeces
topic_facet reindeer
habitat use
competition
faeces distribution
grazing
spatial overlap
sympatric ruminants
parasite aversion
pasture contamination
description Contamination by excrements will increase in areas with high animal densities, such as snow free patches with accessible forage in winter and holding paddocks. Avoidance of faeces dropped by other grazers may result in interference competition by reducing optimal forage intake, or offer protection from the transfer of parasites or disease. We conducted two enclosure experiments investigating reindeer (Rangifer tarandus) reactions towards faeces. The first experiment tested whether reindeer avoid pasture contaminated with faeces from reindeer or sheep (Ovis aries). Both high (0.5 kg/m2) and low (0.05 kg/m2) concentrations of faeces reduced reindeer grazing compared to no faeces. Reindeer grazed significantly less in areas with high concentration of faeces compared to areas with low concentrations, with equally strong avoidance regardless of faeces source. The second experiment analysed the defecation pattern (random or not) of reindeer in a 50 m x 40 m enclosure to investigate how this pattern might change following the introduction of female sheep or additional female reindeer. Both reindeer and sheep defecated in a non-random pattern that was related to their preferred bedding sites. When sheep visited reindeer, the species' faeces distributions were positively correlated, indicating that reindeer and sheep had an overlap in area utilization, at least while bedding. When additional reindeer were introduced and then removed, the combined resident and visiting reindeers' faeces distributions were negatively correlated with the resident reindeers' faeces distribution following the removal of the visiting reindeer. This suggested that resident reindeer avoided the visiting reindeers' faeces. Resident reindeer also produced fewer total droppings when visited by new reindeer, while the number of droppings did not change when visited by sheep. Thus, resident reindeer were more adversely affected by the introduction of new reindeer even after their removal than by the introduction of sheep. In conclusion, the amount and distribution of excrements will play an important role in reindeer grazing and area use in pastures maintaining high densities of reindeer or reindeer and sheep.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Colman, Jonathan E.
Storlien, Svein
Moe, Stein R.
Holand, Øystein
Reimers, Eigil
author_facet Colman, Jonathan E.
Storlien, Svein
Moe, Stein R.
Holand, Øystein
Reimers, Eigil
author_sort Colman, Jonathan E.
title Reindeer avoidance of pasture contaminated with sheep and reindeer faeces
title_short Reindeer avoidance of pasture contaminated with sheep and reindeer faeces
title_full Reindeer avoidance of pasture contaminated with sheep and reindeer faeces
title_fullStr Reindeer avoidance of pasture contaminated with sheep and reindeer faeces
title_full_unstemmed Reindeer avoidance of pasture contaminated with sheep and reindeer faeces
title_sort reindeer avoidance of pasture contaminated with sheep and reindeer faeces
publisher Septentrio Academic Publishing
publishDate 2003
url https://septentrio.uit.no/index.php/rangifer/article/view/1716
https://doi.org/10.7557/2.23.5.1716
genre Rangifer
Rangifer tarandus
genre_facet Rangifer
Rangifer tarandus
op_source Rangifer; Vol 23 (2003): Special Issue No. 14; 313-320
1890-6729
op_relation https://septentrio.uit.no/index.php/rangifer/article/view/1716/1602
https://septentrio.uit.no/index.php/rangifer/article/view/1716
doi:10.7557/2.23.5.1716
op_rights Copyright (c) 2015 Jonathan E. Colman, Svein Storlien, Stein R. Moe, Øystein Holand, Eigil Reimers
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
op_rightsnorm CC-BY
op_doi https://doi.org/10.7557/2.23.5.1716
container_title Rangifer
container_volume 23
container_issue 5
container_start_page 313
_version_ 1766175127038328832