Managing for Caribou Survival in a Partitioned Habitat

Forest management guidelines for woodland caribou (Rangifer tarandus caribou) in Ontario need to be re-examined in light of the finding that caribou partition habitat with moose (Alces alces), partly to find virtual refuges from predation by gray wolves (Canis lupus). Forest-wide guidelines seem ina...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Rangifer
Main Author: Cumming, H.G.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Septentrio Academic Publishing 1996
Subjects:
Online Access:https://septentrio.uit.no/index.php/rangifer/article/view/1239
https://doi.org/10.7557/2.16.4.1239
id ftunitroemsoe:oai:ojs.henry.ub.uit.no:article/1239
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunitroemsoe:oai:ojs.henry.ub.uit.no:article/1239 2023-05-15T13:13:23+02:00 Managing for Caribou Survival in a Partitioned Habitat Cumming, H.G. 1996-01-01 application/pdf https://septentrio.uit.no/index.php/rangifer/article/view/1239 https://doi.org/10.7557/2.16.4.1239 eng eng Septentrio Academic Publishing https://septentrio.uit.no/index.php/rangifer/article/view/1239/1178 https://septentrio.uit.no/index.php/rangifer/article/view/1239 doi:10.7557/2.16.4.1239 Copyright (c) 2015 H.G. Cumming http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ CC-BY Rangifer; Vol 16 (1996): Special Issue No. 9; 171-180 1890-6729 caribou forest harvesting guidelines habitat partitioning moose gray wolf info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion 1996 ftunitroemsoe https://doi.org/10.7557/2.16.4.1239 2021-08-16T14:54:19Z Forest management guidelines for woodland caribou (Rangifer tarandus caribou) in Ontario need to be re-examined in light of the finding that caribou partition habitat with moose (Alces alces), partly to find virtual refuges from predation by gray wolves (Canis lupus). Forest-wide guidelines seem inappropriate for a species that is widely scattered and little known. Management should concentrate on and around currently used virtual refuges to ensure their continued habitability. Cutting these areas may force the caribou into places with higher densities of predators; winter use of roads might bring poachers, increased wolf entry, and accidents. A proposal for 100 km2 clear-cuts scheduled over 60+ years across the forest landscape would probably minimize moose/wolf densities in the long run as intended, but because of habitat partitioning might forfeit any benefits to caribou in the short-term. Sharply reducing moose densities near areas where caribou have sought refuge might incline wolves to switch to caribou. Cutting beyond caribou winter refuge areas should aim at maintaining current moose densities to prevent wolves from switching prey species. Operations level manipulation of the forest around each wintering area should provide winter habitat for the future, while treatment replications with controls across the whole forest would provide reliable knowledge about which approaches work best. The remainder of the forest should be managed to maintain suitable densities of all other species. Article in Journal/Newspaper Alces alces Canis lupus gray wolf Rangifer Rangifer tarandus University of Tromsø: Septentrio Academic Publishing Rangifer 16 4 171
institution Open Polar
collection University of Tromsø: Septentrio Academic Publishing
op_collection_id ftunitroemsoe
language English
topic caribou
forest harvesting
guidelines
habitat partitioning
moose
gray wolf
spellingShingle caribou
forest harvesting
guidelines
habitat partitioning
moose
gray wolf
Cumming, H.G.
Managing for Caribou Survival in a Partitioned Habitat
topic_facet caribou
forest harvesting
guidelines
habitat partitioning
moose
gray wolf
description Forest management guidelines for woodland caribou (Rangifer tarandus caribou) in Ontario need to be re-examined in light of the finding that caribou partition habitat with moose (Alces alces), partly to find virtual refuges from predation by gray wolves (Canis lupus). Forest-wide guidelines seem inappropriate for a species that is widely scattered and little known. Management should concentrate on and around currently used virtual refuges to ensure their continued habitability. Cutting these areas may force the caribou into places with higher densities of predators; winter use of roads might bring poachers, increased wolf entry, and accidents. A proposal for 100 km2 clear-cuts scheduled over 60+ years across the forest landscape would probably minimize moose/wolf densities in the long run as intended, but because of habitat partitioning might forfeit any benefits to caribou in the short-term. Sharply reducing moose densities near areas where caribou have sought refuge might incline wolves to switch to caribou. Cutting beyond caribou winter refuge areas should aim at maintaining current moose densities to prevent wolves from switching prey species. Operations level manipulation of the forest around each wintering area should provide winter habitat for the future, while treatment replications with controls across the whole forest would provide reliable knowledge about which approaches work best. The remainder of the forest should be managed to maintain suitable densities of all other species.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Cumming, H.G.
author_facet Cumming, H.G.
author_sort Cumming, H.G.
title Managing for Caribou Survival in a Partitioned Habitat
title_short Managing for Caribou Survival in a Partitioned Habitat
title_full Managing for Caribou Survival in a Partitioned Habitat
title_fullStr Managing for Caribou Survival in a Partitioned Habitat
title_full_unstemmed Managing for Caribou Survival in a Partitioned Habitat
title_sort managing for caribou survival in a partitioned habitat
publisher Septentrio Academic Publishing
publishDate 1996
url https://septentrio.uit.no/index.php/rangifer/article/view/1239
https://doi.org/10.7557/2.16.4.1239
genre Alces alces
Canis lupus
gray wolf
Rangifer
Rangifer tarandus
genre_facet Alces alces
Canis lupus
gray wolf
Rangifer
Rangifer tarandus
op_source Rangifer; Vol 16 (1996): Special Issue No. 9; 171-180
1890-6729
op_relation https://septentrio.uit.no/index.php/rangifer/article/view/1239/1178
https://septentrio.uit.no/index.php/rangifer/article/view/1239
doi:10.7557/2.16.4.1239
op_rights Copyright (c) 2015 H.G. Cumming
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
op_rightsnorm CC-BY
op_doi https://doi.org/10.7557/2.16.4.1239
container_title Rangifer
container_volume 16
container_issue 4
container_start_page 171
_version_ 1766258046685675520