Terranova, l'interpretazione e la filosofia/teoria del diritto

Giuseppe Terranova, Emeritus of Commercial law at the “La Sapienza” University of Rome, in his book The legal reasoning (2021) addresses important questions of interpretation theory, raising at least three types of reflections. The first one concerns the division of labor, both scientific and academ...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Barberis Mauro
Other Authors: Barberis, Mauro
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:Italian
Published: 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/11368/3041680
_version_ 1821726707203178496
author Barberis Mauro
author2 Barberis, Mauro
author_facet Barberis Mauro
author_sort Barberis Mauro
collection Università degli studi di Trieste: ArTS (Archivio della ricerca di Trieste)
description Giuseppe Terranova, Emeritus of Commercial law at the “La Sapienza” University of Rome, in his book The legal reasoning (2021) addresses important questions of interpretation theory, raising at least three types of reflections. The first one concerns the division of labor, both scientific and academic, between legal dogmatics and philosophy/theory of law. The second reflection concerns Terranova’s own contribution to the theory of interpretation and argumentation, especially by the notions of canonical meaning and application scenario. The third reflection, finally, focuses on the role that philosophy/theory of law could acquire in legal studies, without renouncing the traditional speculative and analytical claims: becoming a ground for meeting/clash among legal dogmatics and non-legal sciences relevant to the jurists.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
genre Terranova
genre_facet Terranova
id ftunitriestiris:oai:arts.units.it:11368/3041680
institution Open Polar
language Italian
op_collection_id ftunitriestiris
op_relation volume:X/2022
issue:19
firstpage:355
lastpage:366
numberofpages:12
journal:LO STATO
https://hdl.handle.net/11368/3041680
op_rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
publishDate 2022
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunitriestiris:oai:arts.units.it:11368/3041680 2025-01-17T01:04:47+00:00 Terranova, l'interpretazione e la filosofia/teoria del diritto Barberis Mauro Barberis, Mauro 2022 STAMPA https://hdl.handle.net/11368/3041680 ita ita volume:X/2022 issue:19 firstpage:355 lastpage:366 numberofpages:12 journal:LO STATO https://hdl.handle.net/11368/3041680 info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess interpretation argumentation methodology info:eu-repo/semantics/article 2022 ftunitriestiris 2023-04-09T05:59:26Z Giuseppe Terranova, Emeritus of Commercial law at the “La Sapienza” University of Rome, in his book The legal reasoning (2021) addresses important questions of interpretation theory, raising at least three types of reflections. The first one concerns the division of labor, both scientific and academic, between legal dogmatics and philosophy/theory of law. The second reflection concerns Terranova’s own contribution to the theory of interpretation and argumentation, especially by the notions of canonical meaning and application scenario. The third reflection, finally, focuses on the role that philosophy/theory of law could acquire in legal studies, without renouncing the traditional speculative and analytical claims: becoming a ground for meeting/clash among legal dogmatics and non-legal sciences relevant to the jurists. Article in Journal/Newspaper Terranova Università degli studi di Trieste: ArTS (Archivio della ricerca di Trieste)
spellingShingle interpretation
argumentation
methodology
Barberis Mauro
Terranova, l'interpretazione e la filosofia/teoria del diritto
title Terranova, l'interpretazione e la filosofia/teoria del diritto
title_full Terranova, l'interpretazione e la filosofia/teoria del diritto
title_fullStr Terranova, l'interpretazione e la filosofia/teoria del diritto
title_full_unstemmed Terranova, l'interpretazione e la filosofia/teoria del diritto
title_short Terranova, l'interpretazione e la filosofia/teoria del diritto
title_sort terranova, l'interpretazione e la filosofia/teoria del diritto
topic interpretation
argumentation
methodology
topic_facet interpretation
argumentation
methodology
url https://hdl.handle.net/11368/3041680