Terranova, l'interpretazione e la filosofia/teoria del diritto
Giuseppe Terranova, Emeritus of Commercial law at the “La Sapienza” University of Rome, in his book The legal reasoning (2021) addresses important questions of interpretation theory, raising at least three types of reflections. The first one concerns the division of labor, both scientific and academ...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | Italian |
Published: |
2022
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/11368/3041680 |
_version_ | 1821726707203178496 |
---|---|
author | Barberis Mauro |
author2 | Barberis, Mauro |
author_facet | Barberis Mauro |
author_sort | Barberis Mauro |
collection | Università degli studi di Trieste: ArTS (Archivio della ricerca di Trieste) |
description | Giuseppe Terranova, Emeritus of Commercial law at the “La Sapienza” University of Rome, in his book The legal reasoning (2021) addresses important questions of interpretation theory, raising at least three types of reflections. The first one concerns the division of labor, both scientific and academic, between legal dogmatics and philosophy/theory of law. The second reflection concerns Terranova’s own contribution to the theory of interpretation and argumentation, especially by the notions of canonical meaning and application scenario. The third reflection, finally, focuses on the role that philosophy/theory of law could acquire in legal studies, without renouncing the traditional speculative and analytical claims: becoming a ground for meeting/clash among legal dogmatics and non-legal sciences relevant to the jurists. |
format | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
genre | Terranova |
genre_facet | Terranova |
id | ftunitriestiris:oai:arts.units.it:11368/3041680 |
institution | Open Polar |
language | Italian |
op_collection_id | ftunitriestiris |
op_relation | volume:X/2022 issue:19 firstpage:355 lastpage:366 numberofpages:12 journal:LO STATO https://hdl.handle.net/11368/3041680 |
op_rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess |
publishDate | 2022 |
record_format | openpolar |
spelling | ftunitriestiris:oai:arts.units.it:11368/3041680 2025-01-17T01:04:47+00:00 Terranova, l'interpretazione e la filosofia/teoria del diritto Barberis Mauro Barberis, Mauro 2022 STAMPA https://hdl.handle.net/11368/3041680 ita ita volume:X/2022 issue:19 firstpage:355 lastpage:366 numberofpages:12 journal:LO STATO https://hdl.handle.net/11368/3041680 info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess interpretation argumentation methodology info:eu-repo/semantics/article 2022 ftunitriestiris 2023-04-09T05:59:26Z Giuseppe Terranova, Emeritus of Commercial law at the “La Sapienza” University of Rome, in his book The legal reasoning (2021) addresses important questions of interpretation theory, raising at least three types of reflections. The first one concerns the division of labor, both scientific and academic, between legal dogmatics and philosophy/theory of law. The second reflection concerns Terranova’s own contribution to the theory of interpretation and argumentation, especially by the notions of canonical meaning and application scenario. The third reflection, finally, focuses on the role that philosophy/theory of law could acquire in legal studies, without renouncing the traditional speculative and analytical claims: becoming a ground for meeting/clash among legal dogmatics and non-legal sciences relevant to the jurists. Article in Journal/Newspaper Terranova Università degli studi di Trieste: ArTS (Archivio della ricerca di Trieste) |
spellingShingle | interpretation argumentation methodology Barberis Mauro Terranova, l'interpretazione e la filosofia/teoria del diritto |
title | Terranova, l'interpretazione e la filosofia/teoria del diritto |
title_full | Terranova, l'interpretazione e la filosofia/teoria del diritto |
title_fullStr | Terranova, l'interpretazione e la filosofia/teoria del diritto |
title_full_unstemmed | Terranova, l'interpretazione e la filosofia/teoria del diritto |
title_short | Terranova, l'interpretazione e la filosofia/teoria del diritto |
title_sort | terranova, l'interpretazione e la filosofia/teoria del diritto |
topic | interpretation argumentation methodology |
topic_facet | interpretation argumentation methodology |
url | https://hdl.handle.net/11368/3041680 |