On the sensitivity of Antarctic sea ice model biases to atmospheric forcing uncertainties

Although atmospheric reanalyses are an extremely valuable tool to study the climate of polar regions, they suffer from large uncertainties in these data-poor areas. In this work, we examine how Antarctic sea ice biases in an ocean-sea ice model are related to these forcing uncertainties. Three exper...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Climate Dynamics
Main Authors: Barthélemy, Antoine, Goosse, Hugues, Fichefet, Thierry, Lecomte, Olivier
Other Authors: UCL - SST/ELI/ELIC - Earth & Climate
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2078.1/194019
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-017-3972-7
id ftunistlouisbrus:oai:dial.uclouvain.be:boreal:194019
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunistlouisbrus:oai:dial.uclouvain.be:boreal:194019 2024-05-12T07:56:35+00:00 On the sensitivity of Antarctic sea ice model biases to atmospheric forcing uncertainties Barthélemy, Antoine Goosse, Hugues Fichefet, Thierry Lecomte, Olivier UCL - SST/ELI/ELIC - Earth & Climate 2017 http://hdl.handle.net/2078.1/194019 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-017-3972-7 eng eng boreal:194019 http://hdl.handle.net/2078.1/194019 doi:10.1007/s00382-017-3972-7 urn:ISSN:0930-7575 urn:EISSN:1432-0894 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Climate Dynamics, , p. 19 p. (2017) Antartic Model Atmospheric forcing Uncertainties Sea ice info:eu-repo/semantics/article 2017 ftunistlouisbrus https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-017-3972-7 2024-04-18T17:33:06Z Although atmospheric reanalyses are an extremely valuable tool to study the climate of polar regions, they suffer from large uncertainties in these data-poor areas. In this work, we examine how Antarctic sea ice biases in an ocean-sea ice model are related to these forcing uncertainties. Three experiments are conducted in which the NEMOLIM model is driven by different atmospheric forcing sets. The minimum ice extent, the ice motion and the ice thickness are sensitive to the reanalysis chosen to drive the model, while the wintertime ice extent and inner pack concentrations are barely affected. The analysis of sea ice concentration budgets allows identifying the processes leading to differences between the experiments, and also indicates that large and similar errors compared to observations are present in all three cases. Our assessment of the influence of forcing inaccuracies on the simulated Antarctic sea ice allows disentangling two types of model biases: the ones that can be reduced thanks to better atmospheric forcings, and those that would require improvements of the physics of the ice or ocean model. Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctic antartic* Sea ice DIAL@USL-B (Université Saint-Louis, Bruxelles) Antarctic Climate Dynamics 51 4 1585 1603
institution Open Polar
collection DIAL@USL-B (Université Saint-Louis, Bruxelles)
op_collection_id ftunistlouisbrus
language English
topic Antartic
Model
Atmospheric forcing
Uncertainties
Sea ice
spellingShingle Antartic
Model
Atmospheric forcing
Uncertainties
Sea ice
Barthélemy, Antoine
Goosse, Hugues
Fichefet, Thierry
Lecomte, Olivier
On the sensitivity of Antarctic sea ice model biases to atmospheric forcing uncertainties
topic_facet Antartic
Model
Atmospheric forcing
Uncertainties
Sea ice
description Although atmospheric reanalyses are an extremely valuable tool to study the climate of polar regions, they suffer from large uncertainties in these data-poor areas. In this work, we examine how Antarctic sea ice biases in an ocean-sea ice model are related to these forcing uncertainties. Three experiments are conducted in which the NEMOLIM model is driven by different atmospheric forcing sets. The minimum ice extent, the ice motion and the ice thickness are sensitive to the reanalysis chosen to drive the model, while the wintertime ice extent and inner pack concentrations are barely affected. The analysis of sea ice concentration budgets allows identifying the processes leading to differences between the experiments, and also indicates that large and similar errors compared to observations are present in all three cases. Our assessment of the influence of forcing inaccuracies on the simulated Antarctic sea ice allows disentangling two types of model biases: the ones that can be reduced thanks to better atmospheric forcings, and those that would require improvements of the physics of the ice or ocean model.
author2 UCL - SST/ELI/ELIC - Earth & Climate
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Barthélemy, Antoine
Goosse, Hugues
Fichefet, Thierry
Lecomte, Olivier
author_facet Barthélemy, Antoine
Goosse, Hugues
Fichefet, Thierry
Lecomte, Olivier
author_sort Barthélemy, Antoine
title On the sensitivity of Antarctic sea ice model biases to atmospheric forcing uncertainties
title_short On the sensitivity of Antarctic sea ice model biases to atmospheric forcing uncertainties
title_full On the sensitivity of Antarctic sea ice model biases to atmospheric forcing uncertainties
title_fullStr On the sensitivity of Antarctic sea ice model biases to atmospheric forcing uncertainties
title_full_unstemmed On the sensitivity of Antarctic sea ice model biases to atmospheric forcing uncertainties
title_sort on the sensitivity of antarctic sea ice model biases to atmospheric forcing uncertainties
publishDate 2017
url http://hdl.handle.net/2078.1/194019
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-017-3972-7
geographic Antarctic
geographic_facet Antarctic
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
antartic*
Sea ice
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
antartic*
Sea ice
op_source Climate Dynamics, , p. 19 p. (2017)
op_relation boreal:194019
http://hdl.handle.net/2078.1/194019
doi:10.1007/s00382-017-3972-7
urn:ISSN:0930-7575
urn:EISSN:1432-0894
op_rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-017-3972-7
container_title Climate Dynamics
container_volume 51
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1585
op_container_end_page 1603
_version_ 1798836731524415488