Modeling the climatic diversity of the warm interglacials

Numerous interglacials have been espoused as Marine Isotopic Stage (MIS) 1 analogues or windows into the future of Holocene climate based on their astronomical characteristics, seasonal insolation patterns or their similarity to predicted anthropogenic warming. However, to date there has been little...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Herold, Nicholas, Yin, Qiuzhen, karami, Pasha, Berger, André
Format: Conference Object
Language:English
Published: 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2078/122744
id ftunistlouisbrus:oai:dial.uclouvain.be:boreal:122744
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunistlouisbrus:oai:dial.uclouvain.be:boreal:122744 2024-05-12T08:05:25+00:00 Modeling the climatic diversity of the warm interglacials Herold, Nicholas Yin, Qiuzhen karami, Pasha Berger, André 2012 http://hdl.handle.net/2078/122744 eng eng boreal:122744 http://hdl.handle.net/2078/122744 info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject 2012 ftunistlouisbrus 2024-04-18T18:02:24Z Numerous interglacials have been espoused as Marine Isotopic Stage (MIS) 1 analogues or windows into the future of Holocene climate based on their astronomical characteristics, seasonal insolation patterns or their similarity to predicted anthropogenic warming. However, to date there has been little quantitative study of the climate of these interglacials within a physically robust framework. Here we examine the climate response to peak interglacial forcing during MIS1, 5, 9, 11 and 19 using the Community Climate System Model 3. We determine which interglacial provides the closest analogue to peak MIS1 conditions as well as the mechanisms that dominate the surface climate responses of these interglacials. Considering the differences in astronomical parameters and greenhouse gases we discount MIS5 and 9 as analogues of peak MIS1 conditions due to their significantly stronger seasonal climate responses. Conversely, based on seasonal and hemispheric averages of surface temperature, precipitation and sea-ice cover, MIS11 and 19 are most similar to MIS1, with MIS11 actually exhibiting a higher affinity particularly during boreal summer. This is attributed to a greater similarity in the seasonal and latitudinal distribution of insolation over middle latitude Eurasia and North America, which are the regions most sensitive to insolation change given the absence of ice-sheet dynamics in our model. Global ocean overturning circulation is also closer to MIS1 during MIS11 than MIS19, due predominantly to differences in Weddell Sea bottom water formation. Thus, under the assumption of present-day ice-sheets MIS11 appears to be the better climatic analogue to peak MIS1 climate. Surface temperature variations between the interglacials are primarily due to sensitivity of the relatively large northern hemisphere landmasses to insolation, sea-level pressure changes in the North Pacific and Southern Oceans, cooling in the Nordic Seas and the summer-remnant effect (winter warming due to increased sea-ice melt during more intensely ... Conference Object Ice Sheet Nordic Seas Sea ice Weddell Sea DIAL@USL-B (Université Saint-Louis, Bruxelles) Pacific Weddell Weddell Sea
institution Open Polar
collection DIAL@USL-B (Université Saint-Louis, Bruxelles)
op_collection_id ftunistlouisbrus
language English
description Numerous interglacials have been espoused as Marine Isotopic Stage (MIS) 1 analogues or windows into the future of Holocene climate based on their astronomical characteristics, seasonal insolation patterns or their similarity to predicted anthropogenic warming. However, to date there has been little quantitative study of the climate of these interglacials within a physically robust framework. Here we examine the climate response to peak interglacial forcing during MIS1, 5, 9, 11 and 19 using the Community Climate System Model 3. We determine which interglacial provides the closest analogue to peak MIS1 conditions as well as the mechanisms that dominate the surface climate responses of these interglacials. Considering the differences in astronomical parameters and greenhouse gases we discount MIS5 and 9 as analogues of peak MIS1 conditions due to their significantly stronger seasonal climate responses. Conversely, based on seasonal and hemispheric averages of surface temperature, precipitation and sea-ice cover, MIS11 and 19 are most similar to MIS1, with MIS11 actually exhibiting a higher affinity particularly during boreal summer. This is attributed to a greater similarity in the seasonal and latitudinal distribution of insolation over middle latitude Eurasia and North America, which are the regions most sensitive to insolation change given the absence of ice-sheet dynamics in our model. Global ocean overturning circulation is also closer to MIS1 during MIS11 than MIS19, due predominantly to differences in Weddell Sea bottom water formation. Thus, under the assumption of present-day ice-sheets MIS11 appears to be the better climatic analogue to peak MIS1 climate. Surface temperature variations between the interglacials are primarily due to sensitivity of the relatively large northern hemisphere landmasses to insolation, sea-level pressure changes in the North Pacific and Southern Oceans, cooling in the Nordic Seas and the summer-remnant effect (winter warming due to increased sea-ice melt during more intensely ...
format Conference Object
author Herold, Nicholas
Yin, Qiuzhen
karami, Pasha
Berger, André
spellingShingle Herold, Nicholas
Yin, Qiuzhen
karami, Pasha
Berger, André
Modeling the climatic diversity of the warm interglacials
author_facet Herold, Nicholas
Yin, Qiuzhen
karami, Pasha
Berger, André
author_sort Herold, Nicholas
title Modeling the climatic diversity of the warm interglacials
title_short Modeling the climatic diversity of the warm interglacials
title_full Modeling the climatic diversity of the warm interglacials
title_fullStr Modeling the climatic diversity of the warm interglacials
title_full_unstemmed Modeling the climatic diversity of the warm interglacials
title_sort modeling the climatic diversity of the warm interglacials
publishDate 2012
url http://hdl.handle.net/2078/122744
geographic Pacific
Weddell
Weddell Sea
geographic_facet Pacific
Weddell
Weddell Sea
genre Ice Sheet
Nordic Seas
Sea ice
Weddell Sea
genre_facet Ice Sheet
Nordic Seas
Sea ice
Weddell Sea
op_relation boreal:122744
http://hdl.handle.net/2078/122744
_version_ 1798847716918296576