Total ozone loss during the 2017/18 Arctic winter and comparison to previous years

International audience The amplitude of ozone depletion in the Arctic is monitored every year since 1994 by comparison between total ozone measurements of eight SAOZ / NDACC UV-Vis spectrometers deployed in the Arctic and 3-D chemical transport model simulations in which ozone is considered as a pas...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Goutail, Florence, Pommereau, Jean-Pierre, Pazmino, Andrea, Lefèvre, Franck, Chipperfield, Martyn, Feng, Wuhu, van Roozendaël, Michel, Jepsen, Nis, Hansen, Georg, Kivi, Rigel, Bognar, Kristof, Strong, Kimberley, Walker, Kaley
Other Authors: STRATO - LATMOS, Laboratoire Atmosphères, Milieux, Observations Spatiales (LATMOS), Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Sorbonne Université (SU)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Sorbonne Université (SU)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Institute for Climate and Atmospheric Science Leeds (ICAS), School of Earth and Environment Leeds (SEE), University of Leeds-University of Leeds, Belgian Institute for Space Aeronomy / Institut d'Aéronomie Spatiale de Belgique (BIRA-IASB), Danish Meteorological Institute (DMI), Norwegian Institute for Air Research (NILU), Finnish Meteorological Institute (FMI), Department of Physics Toronto, University of Toronto
Format: Conference Object
Language:English
Published: HAL CCSD 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://insu.hal.science/insu-01967715
id ftuniparissaclay:oai:HAL:insu-01967715v1
record_format openpolar
spelling ftuniparissaclay:oai:HAL:insu-01967715v1 2024-10-20T14:06:27+00:00 Total ozone loss during the 2017/18 Arctic winter and comparison to previous years Goutail, Florence Pommereau, Jean-Pierre Pazmino, Andrea Lefèvre, Franck Chipperfield, Martyn Feng, Wuhu van Roozendaël, Michel Jepsen, Nis Hansen, Georg Kivi, Rigel Bognar, Kristof Strong, Kimberley Walker, Kaley STRATO - LATMOS Laboratoire Atmosphères, Milieux, Observations Spatiales (LATMOS) Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Sorbonne Université (SU)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Sorbonne Université (SU)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) Institute for Climate and Atmospheric Science Leeds (ICAS) School of Earth and Environment Leeds (SEE) University of Leeds-University of Leeds Belgian Institute for Space Aeronomy / Institut d'Aéronomie Spatiale de Belgique (BIRA-IASB) Danish Meteorological Institute (DMI) Norwegian Institute for Air Research (NILU) Finnish Meteorological Institute (FMI) Department of Physics Toronto University of Toronto Vienna, Austria 2018-04-04 https://insu.hal.science/insu-01967715 en eng HAL CCSD 20th EGU General Assembly 2018 https://insu.hal.science/insu-01967715 20th EGU General Assembly 2018, Apr 2018, Vienna, Austria. 20, pp.EGU2018-1978, Geophysical Research Abstracts [SDU.OCEAN]Sciences of the Universe [physics]/Ocean Atmosphere info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject Conference poster 2018 ftuniparissaclay 2024-10-03T23:59:14Z International audience The amplitude of ozone depletion in the Arctic is monitored every year since 1994 by comparison between total ozone measurements of eight SAOZ / NDACC UV-Vis spectrometers deployed in the Arctic and 3-D chemical transport model simulations in which ozone is considered as a passive tracer.The method allows determining the evolution of the daily rate of the ozone destruction and the amplitude of the cumulative loss at the end of the winter. The amplitude of the destruction varies between 0-10% in relatively warm and short vortex duration years to 25-39% in colder and longer ones.However, as shown by the unprecedented depletion of 39% in 2010/11, the loss is not only dependent on the extension of the vortex in spring, but also on its strength limiting its re-noxification by import of nitrogen oxide species from the outside, as reported by the total NO2 columns measured by the SAOZ instruments.Shown in this presentation will be the evolution of ozone loss and re-noxification in the Arctic during the winter 2017/18 compared to that of previous winters.Compared to observed SAOZ O3 loss, REPROBUS and SLIMCAT CTM simulations are showing similar losses, however the agreement may vary from one year to the other, depending on the assumptions of vortex strength and isolation. The comparison between ozone loss amplitudes and ozone loss rates, seen each year since 1994 by SAOZ and the two CTM simulations will be followed by a discussion of possible causes in their variable amplitude. Conference Object Arctic Archives ouvertes de Paris-Saclay Arctic
institution Open Polar
collection Archives ouvertes de Paris-Saclay
op_collection_id ftuniparissaclay
language English
topic [SDU.OCEAN]Sciences of the Universe [physics]/Ocean
Atmosphere
spellingShingle [SDU.OCEAN]Sciences of the Universe [physics]/Ocean
Atmosphere
Goutail, Florence
Pommereau, Jean-Pierre
Pazmino, Andrea
Lefèvre, Franck
Chipperfield, Martyn
Feng, Wuhu
van Roozendaël, Michel
Jepsen, Nis
Hansen, Georg
Kivi, Rigel
Bognar, Kristof
Strong, Kimberley
Walker, Kaley
Total ozone loss during the 2017/18 Arctic winter and comparison to previous years
topic_facet [SDU.OCEAN]Sciences of the Universe [physics]/Ocean
Atmosphere
description International audience The amplitude of ozone depletion in the Arctic is monitored every year since 1994 by comparison between total ozone measurements of eight SAOZ / NDACC UV-Vis spectrometers deployed in the Arctic and 3-D chemical transport model simulations in which ozone is considered as a passive tracer.The method allows determining the evolution of the daily rate of the ozone destruction and the amplitude of the cumulative loss at the end of the winter. The amplitude of the destruction varies between 0-10% in relatively warm and short vortex duration years to 25-39% in colder and longer ones.However, as shown by the unprecedented depletion of 39% in 2010/11, the loss is not only dependent on the extension of the vortex in spring, but also on its strength limiting its re-noxification by import of nitrogen oxide species from the outside, as reported by the total NO2 columns measured by the SAOZ instruments.Shown in this presentation will be the evolution of ozone loss and re-noxification in the Arctic during the winter 2017/18 compared to that of previous winters.Compared to observed SAOZ O3 loss, REPROBUS and SLIMCAT CTM simulations are showing similar losses, however the agreement may vary from one year to the other, depending on the assumptions of vortex strength and isolation. The comparison between ozone loss amplitudes and ozone loss rates, seen each year since 1994 by SAOZ and the two CTM simulations will be followed by a discussion of possible causes in their variable amplitude.
author2 STRATO - LATMOS
Laboratoire Atmosphères, Milieux, Observations Spatiales (LATMOS)
Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Sorbonne Université (SU)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Sorbonne Université (SU)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
Institute for Climate and Atmospheric Science Leeds (ICAS)
School of Earth and Environment Leeds (SEE)
University of Leeds-University of Leeds
Belgian Institute for Space Aeronomy / Institut d'Aéronomie Spatiale de Belgique (BIRA-IASB)
Danish Meteorological Institute (DMI)
Norwegian Institute for Air Research (NILU)
Finnish Meteorological Institute (FMI)
Department of Physics Toronto
University of Toronto
format Conference Object
author Goutail, Florence
Pommereau, Jean-Pierre
Pazmino, Andrea
Lefèvre, Franck
Chipperfield, Martyn
Feng, Wuhu
van Roozendaël, Michel
Jepsen, Nis
Hansen, Georg
Kivi, Rigel
Bognar, Kristof
Strong, Kimberley
Walker, Kaley
author_facet Goutail, Florence
Pommereau, Jean-Pierre
Pazmino, Andrea
Lefèvre, Franck
Chipperfield, Martyn
Feng, Wuhu
van Roozendaël, Michel
Jepsen, Nis
Hansen, Georg
Kivi, Rigel
Bognar, Kristof
Strong, Kimberley
Walker, Kaley
author_sort Goutail, Florence
title Total ozone loss during the 2017/18 Arctic winter and comparison to previous years
title_short Total ozone loss during the 2017/18 Arctic winter and comparison to previous years
title_full Total ozone loss during the 2017/18 Arctic winter and comparison to previous years
title_fullStr Total ozone loss during the 2017/18 Arctic winter and comparison to previous years
title_full_unstemmed Total ozone loss during the 2017/18 Arctic winter and comparison to previous years
title_sort total ozone loss during the 2017/18 arctic winter and comparison to previous years
publisher HAL CCSD
publishDate 2018
url https://insu.hal.science/insu-01967715
op_coverage Vienna, Austria
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
genre_facet Arctic
op_source 20th EGU General Assembly 2018
https://insu.hal.science/insu-01967715
20th EGU General Assembly 2018, Apr 2018, Vienna, Austria. 20, pp.EGU2018-1978, Geophysical Research Abstracts
_version_ 1813445019586002944