Global patterns and drivers of soil total phosphorus concentration

• Main Authors: He, Xianjin, Augusto, Laurent, Goll, Daniel, S, Ringeval, Bruno, Wang, Yingping, Helfenstein, Julian, Huang, Yuanyuan, Yu, Kailiang, Wang, Zhiqiang, Yang, Yongchuan, Hou, Enqing
• Other Authors: Chongqing University Chongqing, Key Laboratory of the Three Gorges Reservoir Region's Eco-Environment, Ministry of Education, Interactions Sol Plante Atmosphère (UMR ISPA), Ecole Nationale Supérieure des Sciences Agronomiques de Bordeaux-Aquitaine (Bordeaux Sciences Agro)-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE), Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement Gif-sur-Yvette (LSCE), Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université Paris-Saclay-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Direction de Recherche Fondamentale (CEA) (DRF (CEA)), Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA), Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation Canberra (CSIRO), Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing (CAS), Agroscope, Princeton University, Sichuan University Chengdu (SCU), This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32071652, 31870464), the China PostdoctoralScience Foundation (2020M673123), Chongqing Technology Innovation and Application Demonstration Major ThemeSpecial Project (cstc2018jszx-zdyfxmX0007), and the ANR CLAND Convergence Institute
• Format: Report
• Language: English
• Published: HAL CCSD 2022
• Subjects: [SDE]Environmental Sciences; Antarc*; Antarctica
• Online Access: https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-03335526; https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-03335526/document; https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-03335526/file/essd-13-5831-2021.pdf; https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2021-166

Review status: this preprint is currently under review for the journal ESSD. Soils represent the largest phosphorus (P) reserves on land and determining the amount is a critical first step for identifying sites where ecosystem functioning is potentially limited by P availability. However, global patterns and predictors of soil total P concentration remain poorly understood. To address this knowledge gap, we constructed a database of the total P concentration of 5,275 distributed globally natural soils. We quantified the relative importance of 13 soil-forming variables in predicting soil total P concentration and then made further predictions at the global scale using a random forest approach. Soil total P concentration varied significantly among parent material types, soil orders, biomes, and continents, and ranged widely from 1.4 to 9,630.0 (median 430.0 and mean 570.0) mg kg−1 across the globe. About two-thirds (65 %) of the global variation was accounted for by the 13 variables that we selected, among which soil organic carbon concentration, parent material, mean annual temperature, and soil sand content were the most important. While global predictions of soil total P concentration increased significantly with latitude, they varied largely among regions with similar latitudes due to regional differences in parent material, topography, and/or climate conditions. Global soil P stocks (excluding Antarctica) were estimated to be 26.8 ± 3.1 (mean ± standard deviation) Pg and 62.2 ± 8.9 Pg (1 Pg = 1 × 1015 g) in the topsoil (0–30 cm) and subsoil (30–100 cm), respectively. Our global map of soil total P concentration as well as the underlying drivers of soil total P concentration can be used to constraint Earth system models that represent the P cycle and to inform quantification of global soil P availability. Raw datasets and global maps generated in this study are available at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.14583375 (He et al., 2021).