Antarctic Specially Protected Areas (ASPA): a case study at Rothera Point providing tools and perspectives for the implementation of the ASPA network
Antarctica is considered among the world’s last great wildernesses, but its current network of Antarctic Specially Protected Areas (ASPAs) is inadequate, unrepresentative and at risk, needing urgent expansion due to the vulnerability of Antarctica to increasing threats from climate change and human...
Published in: | Biodiversity and Conservation |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2018
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/11383/2077847 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-018-1559-1 http://www.springerlink.com/content/0960-3115 |
id |
ftuninsubriairis:oai:irinsubria.uninsubria.it:11383/2077847 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftuninsubriairis:oai:irinsubria.uninsubria.it:11383/2077847 2024-04-14T08:00:13+00:00 Antarctic Specially Protected Areas (ASPA): a case study at Rothera Point providing tools and perspectives for the implementation of the ASPA network Cannone, N. Convey, P. Malfasi, F. Cannone, N. Convey, P. Malfasi, F. 2018 http://hdl.handle.net/11383/2077847 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-018-1559-1 http://www.springerlink.com/content/0960-3115 eng eng info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/wos/WOS:000436794700011 volume:27 issue:10 firstpage:2641 lastpage:2660 numberofpages:20 journal:BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION http://hdl.handle.net/11383/2077847 doi:10.1007/s10531-018-1559-1 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/scopus/2-s2.0-85046740687 http://www.springerlink.com/content/0960-3115 Antarctica Case study Environmental representativene Threats to biodiversity Wilderness protection Ecology Evolution Behavior and Systematic Nature and Landscape Conservation info:eu-repo/semantics/article 2018 ftuninsubriairis https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-018-1559-1 2024-03-21T19:05:14Z Antarctica is considered among the world’s last great wildernesses, but its current network of Antarctic Specially Protected Areas (ASPAs) is inadequate, unrepresentative and at risk, needing urgent expansion due to the vulnerability of Antarctica to increasing threats from climate change and human activities. Among the existing ASPAs, no. 129 Rothera Point is unique because its designation related specifically to the monitoring of the impacts associated with the neighbouring Rothera Research Station, operated by the United Kingdom. The station is located on Adelaide Island (Antarctic Peninsula) in Antarctic Conservation Biogeographic Region 3 (ACBR3). We aim here to: (1) provide an improved description of the botanical values of the ASPA, and detailed vegetation mapping as for the establishment of future monitoring, (2) assess the representativeness of the ASPA vegetation within a wider geographical context encompassing Marguerite Bay and Adelaide Island and, (3) use this case study as a contribution to the ongoing discussion within the Antarctic Treaty System on the future development of the continent-wide ASPA network. Even though this specific ASPA was not initially designated for its biodiversity value, a higher species richness was recorded within the ASPA than outside the protected area on Rothera Point. Within the local geographic context, based on the available data, Rothera Point is characterized by high biodiversity and, above all, Léonie Island exhibits the greatest floristic richness within Marguerite Bay and Adelaide Island, being a biodiversity hot-spot of exceptional value. This case study emphasizes the continued existence of significant knowledge gaps relating to Antarctic terrestrial biodiversity, and the urgent need for large-scale assessment of the biological values of Antarctica, as one of the main challenges for the implementation of a robust and representative system of protected areas in terrestrial Antarctica, to protect this global natural heritage in the face of current and predicted ... Article in Journal/Newspaper Adelaide Island Antarc* Antarctic Antarctic Peninsula Antarctica IRInSubria - Institutional Repository Insubria (Università degli Studi dell’Insubria) Antarctic The Antarctic Antarctic Peninsula Marguerite ENVELOPE(141.378,141.378,-66.787,-66.787) Rothera ENVELOPE(-68.130,-68.130,-67.568,-67.568) Marguerite Bay ENVELOPE(-68.000,-68.000,-68.500,-68.500) Adelaide Island ENVELOPE(-68.914,-68.914,-67.762,-67.762) Rothera Point ENVELOPE(-68.133,-68.133,-67.567,-67.567) Rothera Research Station ENVELOPE(-68.129,-68.129,-67.566,-67.566) Biodiversity and Conservation 27 10 2641 2660 |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
IRInSubria - Institutional Repository Insubria (Università degli Studi dell’Insubria) |
op_collection_id |
ftuninsubriairis |
language |
English |
topic |
Antarctica Case study Environmental representativene Threats to biodiversity Wilderness protection Ecology Evolution Behavior and Systematic Nature and Landscape Conservation |
spellingShingle |
Antarctica Case study Environmental representativene Threats to biodiversity Wilderness protection Ecology Evolution Behavior and Systematic Nature and Landscape Conservation Cannone, N. Convey, P. Malfasi, F. Antarctic Specially Protected Areas (ASPA): a case study at Rothera Point providing tools and perspectives for the implementation of the ASPA network |
topic_facet |
Antarctica Case study Environmental representativene Threats to biodiversity Wilderness protection Ecology Evolution Behavior and Systematic Nature and Landscape Conservation |
description |
Antarctica is considered among the world’s last great wildernesses, but its current network of Antarctic Specially Protected Areas (ASPAs) is inadequate, unrepresentative and at risk, needing urgent expansion due to the vulnerability of Antarctica to increasing threats from climate change and human activities. Among the existing ASPAs, no. 129 Rothera Point is unique because its designation related specifically to the monitoring of the impacts associated with the neighbouring Rothera Research Station, operated by the United Kingdom. The station is located on Adelaide Island (Antarctic Peninsula) in Antarctic Conservation Biogeographic Region 3 (ACBR3). We aim here to: (1) provide an improved description of the botanical values of the ASPA, and detailed vegetation mapping as for the establishment of future monitoring, (2) assess the representativeness of the ASPA vegetation within a wider geographical context encompassing Marguerite Bay and Adelaide Island and, (3) use this case study as a contribution to the ongoing discussion within the Antarctic Treaty System on the future development of the continent-wide ASPA network. Even though this specific ASPA was not initially designated for its biodiversity value, a higher species richness was recorded within the ASPA than outside the protected area on Rothera Point. Within the local geographic context, based on the available data, Rothera Point is characterized by high biodiversity and, above all, Léonie Island exhibits the greatest floristic richness within Marguerite Bay and Adelaide Island, being a biodiversity hot-spot of exceptional value. This case study emphasizes the continued existence of significant knowledge gaps relating to Antarctic terrestrial biodiversity, and the urgent need for large-scale assessment of the biological values of Antarctica, as one of the main challenges for the implementation of a robust and representative system of protected areas in terrestrial Antarctica, to protect this global natural heritage in the face of current and predicted ... |
author2 |
Cannone, N. Convey, P. Malfasi, F. |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Cannone, N. Convey, P. Malfasi, F. |
author_facet |
Cannone, N. Convey, P. Malfasi, F. |
author_sort |
Cannone, N. |
title |
Antarctic Specially Protected Areas (ASPA): a case study at Rothera Point providing tools and perspectives for the implementation of the ASPA network |
title_short |
Antarctic Specially Protected Areas (ASPA): a case study at Rothera Point providing tools and perspectives for the implementation of the ASPA network |
title_full |
Antarctic Specially Protected Areas (ASPA): a case study at Rothera Point providing tools and perspectives for the implementation of the ASPA network |
title_fullStr |
Antarctic Specially Protected Areas (ASPA): a case study at Rothera Point providing tools and perspectives for the implementation of the ASPA network |
title_full_unstemmed |
Antarctic Specially Protected Areas (ASPA): a case study at Rothera Point providing tools and perspectives for the implementation of the ASPA network |
title_sort |
antarctic specially protected areas (aspa): a case study at rothera point providing tools and perspectives for the implementation of the aspa network |
publishDate |
2018 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11383/2077847 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-018-1559-1 http://www.springerlink.com/content/0960-3115 |
long_lat |
ENVELOPE(141.378,141.378,-66.787,-66.787) ENVELOPE(-68.130,-68.130,-67.568,-67.568) ENVELOPE(-68.000,-68.000,-68.500,-68.500) ENVELOPE(-68.914,-68.914,-67.762,-67.762) ENVELOPE(-68.133,-68.133,-67.567,-67.567) ENVELOPE(-68.129,-68.129,-67.566,-67.566) |
geographic |
Antarctic The Antarctic Antarctic Peninsula Marguerite Rothera Marguerite Bay Adelaide Island Rothera Point Rothera Research Station |
geographic_facet |
Antarctic The Antarctic Antarctic Peninsula Marguerite Rothera Marguerite Bay Adelaide Island Rothera Point Rothera Research Station |
genre |
Adelaide Island Antarc* Antarctic Antarctic Peninsula Antarctica |
genre_facet |
Adelaide Island Antarc* Antarctic Antarctic Peninsula Antarctica |
op_relation |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/wos/WOS:000436794700011 volume:27 issue:10 firstpage:2641 lastpage:2660 numberofpages:20 journal:BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION http://hdl.handle.net/11383/2077847 doi:10.1007/s10531-018-1559-1 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/scopus/2-s2.0-85046740687 http://www.springerlink.com/content/0960-3115 |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-018-1559-1 |
container_title |
Biodiversity and Conservation |
container_volume |
27 |
container_issue |
10 |
container_start_page |
2641 |
op_container_end_page |
2660 |
_version_ |
1796317434990297088 |