Antarctic Specially Protected Areas (ASPA): a case study at Rothera Point providing tools and perspectives for the implementation of the ASPA network

Antarctica is considered among the world’s last great wildernesses, but its current network of Antarctic Specially Protected Areas (ASPAs) is inadequate, unrepresentative and at risk, needing urgent expansion due to the vulnerability of Antarctica to increasing threats from climate change and human...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Biodiversity and Conservation
Main Authors: Cannone, N., Convey, P., Malfasi, F.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/11383/2077847
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-018-1559-1
http://www.springerlink.com/content/0960-3115
id ftuninsubriairis:oai:irinsubria.uninsubria.it:11383/2077847
record_format openpolar
spelling ftuninsubriairis:oai:irinsubria.uninsubria.it:11383/2077847 2024-04-14T08:00:13+00:00 Antarctic Specially Protected Areas (ASPA): a case study at Rothera Point providing tools and perspectives for the implementation of the ASPA network Cannone, N. Convey, P. Malfasi, F. Cannone, N. Convey, P. Malfasi, F. 2018 http://hdl.handle.net/11383/2077847 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-018-1559-1 http://www.springerlink.com/content/0960-3115 eng eng info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/wos/WOS:000436794700011 volume:27 issue:10 firstpage:2641 lastpage:2660 numberofpages:20 journal:BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION http://hdl.handle.net/11383/2077847 doi:10.1007/s10531-018-1559-1 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/scopus/2-s2.0-85046740687 http://www.springerlink.com/content/0960-3115 Antarctica Case study Environmental representativene Threats to biodiversity Wilderness protection Ecology Evolution Behavior and Systematic Nature and Landscape Conservation info:eu-repo/semantics/article 2018 ftuninsubriairis https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-018-1559-1 2024-03-21T19:05:14Z Antarctica is considered among the world’s last great wildernesses, but its current network of Antarctic Specially Protected Areas (ASPAs) is inadequate, unrepresentative and at risk, needing urgent expansion due to the vulnerability of Antarctica to increasing threats from climate change and human activities. Among the existing ASPAs, no. 129 Rothera Point is unique because its designation related specifically to the monitoring of the impacts associated with the neighbouring Rothera Research Station, operated by the United Kingdom. The station is located on Adelaide Island (Antarctic Peninsula) in Antarctic Conservation Biogeographic Region 3 (ACBR3). We aim here to: (1) provide an improved description of the botanical values of the ASPA, and detailed vegetation mapping as for the establishment of future monitoring, (2) assess the representativeness of the ASPA vegetation within a wider geographical context encompassing Marguerite Bay and Adelaide Island and, (3) use this case study as a contribution to the ongoing discussion within the Antarctic Treaty System on the future development of the continent-wide ASPA network. Even though this specific ASPA was not initially designated for its biodiversity value, a higher species richness was recorded within the ASPA than outside the protected area on Rothera Point. Within the local geographic context, based on the available data, Rothera Point is characterized by high biodiversity and, above all, Léonie Island exhibits the greatest floristic richness within Marguerite Bay and Adelaide Island, being a biodiversity hot-spot of exceptional value. This case study emphasizes the continued existence of significant knowledge gaps relating to Antarctic terrestrial biodiversity, and the urgent need for large-scale assessment of the biological values of Antarctica, as one of the main challenges for the implementation of a robust and representative system of protected areas in terrestrial Antarctica, to protect this global natural heritage in the face of current and predicted ... Article in Journal/Newspaper Adelaide Island Antarc* Antarctic Antarctic Peninsula Antarctica IRInSubria - Institutional Repository Insubria (Università degli Studi dell’Insubria) Antarctic The Antarctic Antarctic Peninsula Marguerite ENVELOPE(141.378,141.378,-66.787,-66.787) Rothera ENVELOPE(-68.130,-68.130,-67.568,-67.568) Marguerite Bay ENVELOPE(-68.000,-68.000,-68.500,-68.500) Adelaide Island ENVELOPE(-68.914,-68.914,-67.762,-67.762) Rothera Point ENVELOPE(-68.133,-68.133,-67.567,-67.567) Rothera Research Station ENVELOPE(-68.129,-68.129,-67.566,-67.566) Biodiversity and Conservation 27 10 2641 2660
institution Open Polar
collection IRInSubria - Institutional Repository Insubria (Università degli Studi dell’Insubria)
op_collection_id ftuninsubriairis
language English
topic Antarctica
Case study
Environmental representativene
Threats to biodiversity
Wilderness protection
Ecology
Evolution
Behavior and Systematic
Nature and Landscape Conservation
spellingShingle Antarctica
Case study
Environmental representativene
Threats to biodiversity
Wilderness protection
Ecology
Evolution
Behavior and Systematic
Nature and Landscape Conservation
Cannone, N.
Convey, P.
Malfasi, F.
Antarctic Specially Protected Areas (ASPA): a case study at Rothera Point providing tools and perspectives for the implementation of the ASPA network
topic_facet Antarctica
Case study
Environmental representativene
Threats to biodiversity
Wilderness protection
Ecology
Evolution
Behavior and Systematic
Nature and Landscape Conservation
description Antarctica is considered among the world’s last great wildernesses, but its current network of Antarctic Specially Protected Areas (ASPAs) is inadequate, unrepresentative and at risk, needing urgent expansion due to the vulnerability of Antarctica to increasing threats from climate change and human activities. Among the existing ASPAs, no. 129 Rothera Point is unique because its designation related specifically to the monitoring of the impacts associated with the neighbouring Rothera Research Station, operated by the United Kingdom. The station is located on Adelaide Island (Antarctic Peninsula) in Antarctic Conservation Biogeographic Region 3 (ACBR3). We aim here to: (1) provide an improved description of the botanical values of the ASPA, and detailed vegetation mapping as for the establishment of future monitoring, (2) assess the representativeness of the ASPA vegetation within a wider geographical context encompassing Marguerite Bay and Adelaide Island and, (3) use this case study as a contribution to the ongoing discussion within the Antarctic Treaty System on the future development of the continent-wide ASPA network. Even though this specific ASPA was not initially designated for its biodiversity value, a higher species richness was recorded within the ASPA than outside the protected area on Rothera Point. Within the local geographic context, based on the available data, Rothera Point is characterized by high biodiversity and, above all, Léonie Island exhibits the greatest floristic richness within Marguerite Bay and Adelaide Island, being a biodiversity hot-spot of exceptional value. This case study emphasizes the continued existence of significant knowledge gaps relating to Antarctic terrestrial biodiversity, and the urgent need for large-scale assessment of the biological values of Antarctica, as one of the main challenges for the implementation of a robust and representative system of protected areas in terrestrial Antarctica, to protect this global natural heritage in the face of current and predicted ...
author2 Cannone, N.
Convey, P.
Malfasi, F.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Cannone, N.
Convey, P.
Malfasi, F.
author_facet Cannone, N.
Convey, P.
Malfasi, F.
author_sort Cannone, N.
title Antarctic Specially Protected Areas (ASPA): a case study at Rothera Point providing tools and perspectives for the implementation of the ASPA network
title_short Antarctic Specially Protected Areas (ASPA): a case study at Rothera Point providing tools and perspectives for the implementation of the ASPA network
title_full Antarctic Specially Protected Areas (ASPA): a case study at Rothera Point providing tools and perspectives for the implementation of the ASPA network
title_fullStr Antarctic Specially Protected Areas (ASPA): a case study at Rothera Point providing tools and perspectives for the implementation of the ASPA network
title_full_unstemmed Antarctic Specially Protected Areas (ASPA): a case study at Rothera Point providing tools and perspectives for the implementation of the ASPA network
title_sort antarctic specially protected areas (aspa): a case study at rothera point providing tools and perspectives for the implementation of the aspa network
publishDate 2018
url http://hdl.handle.net/11383/2077847
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-018-1559-1
http://www.springerlink.com/content/0960-3115
long_lat ENVELOPE(141.378,141.378,-66.787,-66.787)
ENVELOPE(-68.130,-68.130,-67.568,-67.568)
ENVELOPE(-68.000,-68.000,-68.500,-68.500)
ENVELOPE(-68.914,-68.914,-67.762,-67.762)
ENVELOPE(-68.133,-68.133,-67.567,-67.567)
ENVELOPE(-68.129,-68.129,-67.566,-67.566)
geographic Antarctic
The Antarctic
Antarctic Peninsula
Marguerite
Rothera
Marguerite Bay
Adelaide Island
Rothera Point
Rothera Research Station
geographic_facet Antarctic
The Antarctic
Antarctic Peninsula
Marguerite
Rothera
Marguerite Bay
Adelaide Island
Rothera Point
Rothera Research Station
genre Adelaide Island
Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctic Peninsula
Antarctica
genre_facet Adelaide Island
Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctic Peninsula
Antarctica
op_relation info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/wos/WOS:000436794700011
volume:27
issue:10
firstpage:2641
lastpage:2660
numberofpages:20
journal:BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION
http://hdl.handle.net/11383/2077847
doi:10.1007/s10531-018-1559-1
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/scopus/2-s2.0-85046740687
http://www.springerlink.com/content/0960-3115
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-018-1559-1
container_title Biodiversity and Conservation
container_volume 27
container_issue 10
container_start_page 2641
op_container_end_page 2660
_version_ 1796317434990297088