Tripartite periodization of the Antarctic Treaty System from a systemic perspective
In 1959, twelve countries with a strong record of interest in Antarctica signed a Treaty allowing accessibility to all signatories wishing to conduct peaceful scientific research. The Antarctic Treaty established science and international cooperation as its cornerstones but raised controversies beca...
Published in: | Relaciones Internacionales |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | Spanish |
Published: |
Universidad Nacional de La Plata
2019
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://revistas.unlp.edu.ar/RRII-IRI/article/view/6703 |
id |
ftuninlaplataojs:oai:revistas.unlp.edu.ar:article/6703 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftuninlaplataojs:oai:revistas.unlp.edu.ar:article/6703 2023-05-15T13:41:29+02:00 Tripartite periodization of the Antarctic Treaty System from a systemic perspective Periodización tripartita del Sistema del Tratado Antártico desde una perspectiva sistémica Heinzelmann Portella de Aguiar, Mônica 2019-08-08 application/pdf https://revistas.unlp.edu.ar/RRII-IRI/article/view/6703 spa spa Universidad Nacional de La Plata https://revistas.unlp.edu.ar/RRII-IRI/article/view/6703/6962 https://revistas.unlp.edu.ar/RRII-IRI/article/view/6703 International Relations; Vol. 28 No. 56 (2019); 37-56 Relaciones Internacionales; Vol. 28 Núm. 56 (2019); 37-56 2314-2766 1515-3371 Antarctic Treaty System International Relations international regimes systemic perspective international cooperation Sistema del Tratado Antártico Relaciones Internacionales regímenes internacionales perspectiva sistémica cooperación internacional info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion 2019 ftuninlaplataojs 2022-08-25T16:26:44Z In 1959, twelve countries with a strong record of interest in Antarctica signed a Treaty allowing accessibility to all signatories wishing to conduct peaceful scientific research. The Antarctic Treaty established science and international cooperation as its cornerstones but raised controversies because of its hosting of sovereignty claims over Antarctic territory. This research aims to fill a gap in literature proposing a strict periodization of the Antarctic Treaty System under a systemic perspective. The paper also examines Brazil's accession into the Treaty. Using as indicators of legitimacy the increase in membership and the transparency of decision-making processes, the author argues that the Antarctic Treaty System has become recognized as a legitimate international regime. En 1959, doce países con alto grado de interés en la Antártida firmaron un Tratado permitiendo libre acceso a la investigación científica pacífica. El Tratado Antártico estableció la ciencia y la cooperación internacional como su base, pero generó controversias al aceptar reclamos de soberanía sobre el territorio antártico. Esta investigación objetiva llenar un vacío bibliográfico al proponer una estricta periodización del Sistema del Tratado Antártico desde una perspectiva sistémica. El articulo también examina la adhesión de Brasil al Tratado. Utilizando como indicadores de legitimidad el aumento en la membresía y la transparencia de los procesos de toma de decisiones, el autor sostiene que el Sistema del Tratado Antártico pasó a ser reconocido como un régimen internacional legítimo. Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctic Antarctica Antártida Universidad Nacional de La Plata: Portal del Revistas del UNLP Antarctic The Antarctic Soberanía ENVELOPE(-59.633,-59.633,-62.483,-62.483) Relaciones Internacionales 28 56 37 56 |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Universidad Nacional de La Plata: Portal del Revistas del UNLP |
op_collection_id |
ftuninlaplataojs |
language |
Spanish |
topic |
Antarctic Treaty System International Relations international regimes systemic perspective international cooperation Sistema del Tratado Antártico Relaciones Internacionales regímenes internacionales perspectiva sistémica cooperación internacional |
spellingShingle |
Antarctic Treaty System International Relations international regimes systemic perspective international cooperation Sistema del Tratado Antártico Relaciones Internacionales regímenes internacionales perspectiva sistémica cooperación internacional Heinzelmann Portella de Aguiar, Mônica Tripartite periodization of the Antarctic Treaty System from a systemic perspective |
topic_facet |
Antarctic Treaty System International Relations international regimes systemic perspective international cooperation Sistema del Tratado Antártico Relaciones Internacionales regímenes internacionales perspectiva sistémica cooperación internacional |
description |
In 1959, twelve countries with a strong record of interest in Antarctica signed a Treaty allowing accessibility to all signatories wishing to conduct peaceful scientific research. The Antarctic Treaty established science and international cooperation as its cornerstones but raised controversies because of its hosting of sovereignty claims over Antarctic territory. This research aims to fill a gap in literature proposing a strict periodization of the Antarctic Treaty System under a systemic perspective. The paper also examines Brazil's accession into the Treaty. Using as indicators of legitimacy the increase in membership and the transparency of decision-making processes, the author argues that the Antarctic Treaty System has become recognized as a legitimate international regime. En 1959, doce países con alto grado de interés en la Antártida firmaron un Tratado permitiendo libre acceso a la investigación científica pacífica. El Tratado Antártico estableció la ciencia y la cooperación internacional como su base, pero generó controversias al aceptar reclamos de soberanía sobre el territorio antártico. Esta investigación objetiva llenar un vacío bibliográfico al proponer una estricta periodización del Sistema del Tratado Antártico desde una perspectiva sistémica. El articulo también examina la adhesión de Brasil al Tratado. Utilizando como indicadores de legitimidad el aumento en la membresía y la transparencia de los procesos de toma de decisiones, el autor sostiene que el Sistema del Tratado Antártico pasó a ser reconocido como un régimen internacional legítimo. |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Heinzelmann Portella de Aguiar, Mônica |
author_facet |
Heinzelmann Portella de Aguiar, Mônica |
author_sort |
Heinzelmann Portella de Aguiar, Mônica |
title |
Tripartite periodization of the Antarctic Treaty System from a systemic perspective |
title_short |
Tripartite periodization of the Antarctic Treaty System from a systemic perspective |
title_full |
Tripartite periodization of the Antarctic Treaty System from a systemic perspective |
title_fullStr |
Tripartite periodization of the Antarctic Treaty System from a systemic perspective |
title_full_unstemmed |
Tripartite periodization of the Antarctic Treaty System from a systemic perspective |
title_sort |
tripartite periodization of the antarctic treaty system from a systemic perspective |
publisher |
Universidad Nacional de La Plata |
publishDate |
2019 |
url |
https://revistas.unlp.edu.ar/RRII-IRI/article/view/6703 |
long_lat |
ENVELOPE(-59.633,-59.633,-62.483,-62.483) |
geographic |
Antarctic The Antarctic Soberanía |
geographic_facet |
Antarctic The Antarctic Soberanía |
genre |
Antarc* Antarctic Antarctica Antártida |
genre_facet |
Antarc* Antarctic Antarctica Antártida |
op_source |
International Relations; Vol. 28 No. 56 (2019); 37-56 Relaciones Internacionales; Vol. 28 Núm. 56 (2019); 37-56 2314-2766 1515-3371 |
op_relation |
https://revistas.unlp.edu.ar/RRII-IRI/article/view/6703/6962 https://revistas.unlp.edu.ar/RRII-IRI/article/view/6703 |
container_title |
Relaciones Internacionales |
container_volume |
28 |
container_issue |
56 |
container_start_page |
37 |
op_container_end_page |
56 |
_version_ |
1766151323781169152 |