Acoustic Surface Backscatter vs Incidence Angle from Glacial Ice

Surface acoustic backscatter angular response is commonly used for seafloor sediment characterization, however composite models of this type do not yet exist for the backscatter angular response of sea ice. For seafloor measurements, the response near normal incidence is often dominated by a specula...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Schmidt, Val E., Hamilton, A K, Mueller, D, Brucker, S, Hamilton, Travis, Forrest, A L, Laval, B E
Format: Text
Language:unknown
Published: University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:https://scholars.unh.edu/ccom/689
id ftuninhampshire:oai:scholars.unh.edu:ccom-1689
record_format openpolar
spelling ftuninhampshire:oai:scholars.unh.edu:ccom-1689 2023-05-15T18:17:31+02:00 Acoustic Surface Backscatter vs Incidence Angle from Glacial Ice Schmidt, Val E. Hamilton, A K Mueller, D Brucker, S Hamilton, Travis Forrest, A L Laval, B E 2013-06-01T07:00:00Z https://scholars.unh.edu/ccom/689 unknown University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository https://scholars.unh.edu/ccom/689 Center for Coastal and Ocean Mapping text 2013 ftuninhampshire 2023-01-30T21:33:06Z Surface acoustic backscatter angular response is commonly used for seafloor sediment characterization, however composite models of this type do not yet exist for the backscatter angular response of sea ice. For seafloor measurements, the response near normal incidence is often dominated by a specular return and influence from returns from the volume beneath the water-sediment interface, which is highly dependent on substrate grain size, acoustic impedance, and porosity. At oblique angles beyond the water-sediment critical angle, seafloor roughness due to grain size and bedforms dominate the response. The combined angular response can therefore be highly suggestive of the composition of the seafloor. For sea ice, at angles beyond the critical angle, roughness models similar to those used for the seafloor are applicable; however, near normal incidence angles, models remain largely undeveloped. With the development of appropriate models, acoustic measurements may allow discrimination of ice characteristics such as ice air content, interstitial fresh-water content, sea-ice age and ice origins (i.e., terrestrial vs. marine). Similar to seafloor measurements, the combined angular response of sea ice may provide a remote sensing method for widespread mapping and characterization of ice from surface and submersible vessels. In 2011, as part of an effort to gather information on the precise shape of large tabular icebergs to calibrate the Canadian Ice Service ice hazard drift and deterioration model, portions of the periphery of several pieces of the Petermann Ice Island, were surveyed with a Kongsberg EM3002 multibeam sonar. In addition to the geometric data, the collected measurements provide a means to measure the surface acoustic backscatter response of the ice surface as a function of angle of incidence, providing a preliminary characterization data set of tabular ice islands. While it is difficult to draw conclusions at this early stage, models for the seafloor provide some insight to the data. For example, ... Text Sea ice University of New Hampshire: Scholars Repository Kongsberg ENVELOPE(19.082,19.082,69.123,69.123)
institution Open Polar
collection University of New Hampshire: Scholars Repository
op_collection_id ftuninhampshire
language unknown
description Surface acoustic backscatter angular response is commonly used for seafloor sediment characterization, however composite models of this type do not yet exist for the backscatter angular response of sea ice. For seafloor measurements, the response near normal incidence is often dominated by a specular return and influence from returns from the volume beneath the water-sediment interface, which is highly dependent on substrate grain size, acoustic impedance, and porosity. At oblique angles beyond the water-sediment critical angle, seafloor roughness due to grain size and bedforms dominate the response. The combined angular response can therefore be highly suggestive of the composition of the seafloor. For sea ice, at angles beyond the critical angle, roughness models similar to those used for the seafloor are applicable; however, near normal incidence angles, models remain largely undeveloped. With the development of appropriate models, acoustic measurements may allow discrimination of ice characteristics such as ice air content, interstitial fresh-water content, sea-ice age and ice origins (i.e., terrestrial vs. marine). Similar to seafloor measurements, the combined angular response of sea ice may provide a remote sensing method for widespread mapping and characterization of ice from surface and submersible vessels. In 2011, as part of an effort to gather information on the precise shape of large tabular icebergs to calibrate the Canadian Ice Service ice hazard drift and deterioration model, portions of the periphery of several pieces of the Petermann Ice Island, were surveyed with a Kongsberg EM3002 multibeam sonar. In addition to the geometric data, the collected measurements provide a means to measure the surface acoustic backscatter response of the ice surface as a function of angle of incidence, providing a preliminary characterization data set of tabular ice islands. While it is difficult to draw conclusions at this early stage, models for the seafloor provide some insight to the data. For example, ...
format Text
author Schmidt, Val E.
Hamilton, A K
Mueller, D
Brucker, S
Hamilton, Travis
Forrest, A L
Laval, B E
spellingShingle Schmidt, Val E.
Hamilton, A K
Mueller, D
Brucker, S
Hamilton, Travis
Forrest, A L
Laval, B E
Acoustic Surface Backscatter vs Incidence Angle from Glacial Ice
author_facet Schmidt, Val E.
Hamilton, A K
Mueller, D
Brucker, S
Hamilton, Travis
Forrest, A L
Laval, B E
author_sort Schmidt, Val E.
title Acoustic Surface Backscatter vs Incidence Angle from Glacial Ice
title_short Acoustic Surface Backscatter vs Incidence Angle from Glacial Ice
title_full Acoustic Surface Backscatter vs Incidence Angle from Glacial Ice
title_fullStr Acoustic Surface Backscatter vs Incidence Angle from Glacial Ice
title_full_unstemmed Acoustic Surface Backscatter vs Incidence Angle from Glacial Ice
title_sort acoustic surface backscatter vs incidence angle from glacial ice
publisher University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository
publishDate 2013
url https://scholars.unh.edu/ccom/689
long_lat ENVELOPE(19.082,19.082,69.123,69.123)
geographic Kongsberg
geographic_facet Kongsberg
genre Sea ice
genre_facet Sea ice
op_source Center for Coastal and Ocean Mapping
op_relation https://scholars.unh.edu/ccom/689
_version_ 1766191778688401408