OBVIATION AND COREFERENCE RELATIONS IN CREE-MONTAGNAIS-NASKAPI
Algonquian languages distinguish between proximate and obviative third persons. This paper claims that wherever two or more proximate third person occurs in a given derivation, these are necessarily interpreted as coreferential. Consequently, only one proximate referent is permitted per derivation....
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Atlantic Provinces Linguistic Association
2001
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://journals.lib.unb.ca/index.php/la/article/view/22450 |
id |
ftuninewbrunojs:oai:ojs.journals.lib.unb.ca:article/22450 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftuninewbrunojs:oai:ojs.journals.lib.unb.ca:article/22450 2023-05-15T17:13:13+02:00 OBVIATION AND COREFERENCE RELATIONS IN CREE-MONTAGNAIS-NASKAPI Brittain, Julie 2001-07-31 application/pdf https://journals.lib.unb.ca/index.php/la/article/view/22450 eng eng Atlantic Provinces Linguistic Association https://journals.lib.unb.ca/index.php/la/article/view/22450/26107 https://journals.lib.unb.ca/index.php/la/article/view/22450 Copyright (c) 2015 Linguistica Atlantica Linguistica Atlantica; Vol. 23 (2001); 69-91 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion 2001 ftuninewbrunojs 2022-07-11T11:56:28Z Algonquian languages distinguish between proximate and obviative third persons. This paper claims that wherever two or more proximate third person occurs in a given derivation, these are necessarily interpreted as coreferential. Consequently, only one proximate referent is permitted per derivation. This requirement is highly ranked in the grammar, overriding the universally-familiar mechanisms of determining pronominal reference formalized by Binding Theory. Weak crossover constructions are examined as a case in point-in a subset of the Algonquian constructions examined, the expected weak crossover effects (disjoint reference between a wh-phrase and a pronominal) do not appear. In this same subset of cases, coreference is enforced by the requirement to maintain a single proximate referent per derivation. Weak crossover effects appear in cases where this requirement does not hold. This analysis permits an account of the absence of crossover effects in Algonquian which does not appeal to the argument that Algonquian differs structurally from so-called 'configurational languages'. Possibly, the demands of the proximate/obviative system make the grammar of Algonquian appear more divergent than it is. Article in Journal/Newspaper montagnais naskapi University of New Brunswick: Centre for Digital Scholarship Journals |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
University of New Brunswick: Centre for Digital Scholarship Journals |
op_collection_id |
ftuninewbrunojs |
language |
English |
description |
Algonquian languages distinguish between proximate and obviative third persons. This paper claims that wherever two or more proximate third person occurs in a given derivation, these are necessarily interpreted as coreferential. Consequently, only one proximate referent is permitted per derivation. This requirement is highly ranked in the grammar, overriding the universally-familiar mechanisms of determining pronominal reference formalized by Binding Theory. Weak crossover constructions are examined as a case in point-in a subset of the Algonquian constructions examined, the expected weak crossover effects (disjoint reference between a wh-phrase and a pronominal) do not appear. In this same subset of cases, coreference is enforced by the requirement to maintain a single proximate referent per derivation. Weak crossover effects appear in cases where this requirement does not hold. This analysis permits an account of the absence of crossover effects in Algonquian which does not appeal to the argument that Algonquian differs structurally from so-called 'configurational languages'. Possibly, the demands of the proximate/obviative system make the grammar of Algonquian appear more divergent than it is. |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Brittain, Julie |
spellingShingle |
Brittain, Julie OBVIATION AND COREFERENCE RELATIONS IN CREE-MONTAGNAIS-NASKAPI |
author_facet |
Brittain, Julie |
author_sort |
Brittain, Julie |
title |
OBVIATION AND COREFERENCE RELATIONS IN CREE-MONTAGNAIS-NASKAPI |
title_short |
OBVIATION AND COREFERENCE RELATIONS IN CREE-MONTAGNAIS-NASKAPI |
title_full |
OBVIATION AND COREFERENCE RELATIONS IN CREE-MONTAGNAIS-NASKAPI |
title_fullStr |
OBVIATION AND COREFERENCE RELATIONS IN CREE-MONTAGNAIS-NASKAPI |
title_full_unstemmed |
OBVIATION AND COREFERENCE RELATIONS IN CREE-MONTAGNAIS-NASKAPI |
title_sort |
obviation and coreference relations in cree-montagnais-naskapi |
publisher |
Atlantic Provinces Linguistic Association |
publishDate |
2001 |
url |
https://journals.lib.unb.ca/index.php/la/article/view/22450 |
genre |
montagnais naskapi |
genre_facet |
montagnais naskapi |
op_source |
Linguistica Atlantica; Vol. 23 (2001); 69-91 |
op_relation |
https://journals.lib.unb.ca/index.php/la/article/view/22450/26107 https://journals.lib.unb.ca/index.php/la/article/view/22450 |
op_rights |
Copyright (c) 2015 Linguistica Atlantica |
_version_ |
1766070157890813952 |