Subsidiarna zaščita

• Main Author: Stare, Katja
• Other Authors: Zagorc, Saša
• Format: Master Thesis
• Language: Slovenian
• Published: 2017
• Subjects: Mednarodna zaščita; evropsko azilno pravo; subsidiarna zaščita; Diakité; Elgafaji; Kvalifikacijska direktiva II; Kvalifikacijska uredba; Zakon o mednarodni zaščiti; Sodišče EU; ESČP; International protection; European asylum law; subsidiary protection; Qualification Directive II; Qualification Regulation; International Protection Act; CJEU; ECtHR; sami
• Online Access: https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/IzpisGradiva.php?id=95416; https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/Dokument.php?id=104009&dn=; https://plus.si.cobiss.net/opac7/bib/15789393?lang=sl

Magistrska naloga obravnava institut subsidiarne zaščite, ki je ena od oblik mednarodne zaščite v Evropski uniji. Subsidiarna zaščita je bila v pravo EU vpeljana na podlagi praks držav članic in predstavlja zaščito, ki dopolnjuje Konvencijo o statusu beguncev iz leta 1951. Osebe s statusom subsidiarne zaščite uživajo manj pravic kot osebe s statusom begunca. Zaradi skope podlage za razlago v sami direktivi, v travaux préparatoires in v sodni praksi Sodišča Evropske unije je interpretacija instituta zahtevna, kar vodi do razlik pri uporabi instituta med državami članicami. Prvi del magistrske naloge je namenjen predstavitvi instituta. Drugi del se osredotoča na identifikacijo elementov instituta, ki povzročajo največ težav pri interpretaciji. Za vsak institut so podane interpretativne smernice, podprte s sodno prakso SEU, ESČP in slovenskih sodišč. V tretjem delu magistrske naloge je prikazano, da različna ureditev statusa subsidiarne zaščite, ki upravičencem zagotavlja krajše trajanje zaščite in omejen dostop do socialnih pravic v primerjavi s statusom begunca, ni potrebna in objektivno utemeljena. V sklepu magistrske naloge je kritična opredelitev do previdene reforme Skupnega evropskega azilnega sistema, v okviru katerega se predvideva sprejem Kvalifikacijske uredbe. Predlog Kvalifikacijske uredbe državam članicam ne ponudi trdnejše opore za interpretacijo instituta niti ne rešuje vprašanja različne obravnave oseb s statusom begunca in statusom subsidiarne zaščite. The thesis addresses subsidiary protection, a form of international protection in the European Union. Subsidiary protection was incorporated in the EU law on the basis of EU member states practices, complementing the protection granted by the 1951 Refugee Convention. Subsidiary protection beneficiaries enjoy fewer rights than persons with refugee status. Interpretation of the legal construct is often challenging due to very limited basis for interpretation in the Directive, travaux préparatoires and CJEU case-law. That, consequently, leads to different applications of subsidiary protection among member states. The first part of the thesis consists of a brief introduction of subsidiary protection. The second part is focused on the identification of the elements of subsidiary protection definition, which are causing major difficulties in interpretation. Interpretational guidelines supported by the CJEU, ECtHR and Slovenian courts case-law are provided for each of the elements. The third part of the thesis illustrates that different regulations of refugee status and subsidiary protection status, which grants a shorter duration of the protection and limited access to social welfare to the beneficiaries, is not necessary and objectively justified. The thesis is concluded with critical observations on the intended Common European Asylum System reform and expected adoption of the Qualification Regulation. The proposal of the Qualification Regulation neither offers a more solid basis for interpretation of subsidiary protection nor solves the issue of different treatment of refugees and persons with subsidiary protection status.