Pogled na drugega: podobe Bosne in Hercegovine in njenih prebivalcev med 1878 in 1918

Magistrsko delo skuša osvetliti vprašanje o oblikovanju identitet in diskurzov habsburške periferije v času okupacije in kasnejše aneksije Bosne in Hercegovine. Če klasične »študije imperijev« izhajajo iz binarne matrice razmerja metropola (Dunaj) – periferija (Bosna in Hercegovina), avtor poskuša d...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Krivec, Jaroš
Other Authors: Stergar, Rok
Format: Master Thesis
Language:Slovenian
Published: J. Krivec 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/IzpisGradiva.php?id=130273
https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/Dokument.php?id=147341&dn=
https://plus.si.cobiss.net/opac7/bib/77937667?lang=sl
id ftuniljubljanair:oai:repozitorij.uni-lj.si:IzpisGradiva.php-id-130273
record_format openpolar
institution Open Polar
collection Repository of the University of Ljubljana (RUL)
op_collection_id ftuniljubljanair
language Slovenian
topic identitete
kulturna zgodovina
Habsburška monarhija
Bosna in Hercegovina
19. stoletje
identities
cultural history
Habsburg Monarchy
Bosnia and Herzegovina
19th century
info:eu-repo/classification/udc/94(497.15)"1878/1918"
spellingShingle identitete
kulturna zgodovina
Habsburška monarhija
Bosna in Hercegovina
19. stoletje
identities
cultural history
Habsburg Monarchy
Bosnia and Herzegovina
19th century
info:eu-repo/classification/udc/94(497.15)"1878/1918"
Krivec, Jaroš
Pogled na drugega: podobe Bosne in Hercegovine in njenih prebivalcev med 1878 in 1918
topic_facet identitete
kulturna zgodovina
Habsburška monarhija
Bosna in Hercegovina
19. stoletje
identities
cultural history
Habsburg Monarchy
Bosnia and Herzegovina
19th century
info:eu-repo/classification/udc/94(497.15)"1878/1918"
description Magistrsko delo skuša osvetliti vprašanje o oblikovanju identitet in diskurzov habsburške periferije v času okupacije in kasnejše aneksije Bosne in Hercegovine. Če klasične »študije imperijev« izhajajo iz binarne matrice razmerja metropola (Dunaj) – periferija (Bosna in Hercegovina), avtor poskuša dodati še en člen, namreč »slovenske dežele«, ki sicer spadajo v kategorijo periferije. Raziskovalno vprašanje se osredotoča na to, kako so se prebivalci te periferije ob stiku z novo »kolonijo« sami videli in razumeli ter, seveda, kako so dojemali in opisovali ljudi in situacijo, ki so jo našli v novi »bosanski periferiji«. Fokus je torej na oblikah osmišljanja in pripisovanju pomena. Na podlagi različnih virov s pomočjo kulturnozgodovinskega pristopa, razumljenega predvsem kot specifično perspektivo na različne predmete preučevanja, avtor poskuša razbrati, kakšen diskurz (hegemonialen, imperialen, kolonialen, jugoslovanski, avstrijski …) se je razvil med letoma 1878 in 1918 in h kakšni vrsti subjektivizacije je vodil. Naloga pokaže da južnoslovanska oz. slovenska kultura ni bila samo nem objekt (nemškega) hegemonialnega diskurza, ni bila samo kolaborant dunajskega centra, ampak je bila sama aktiven in samoiniciativen govoreč subjekt. Osrednje mesto raziskave predstavljajo viri od »spodaj«, to pomeni, da so predmet zanimanja posamezni »mali« akterji (posamezni vojaki, profesorji, pisatelji) in njihova konkretna, partikularna in vedno parcialna izkušnja. Undergraduate thesis attempts to illuminate the questions on the formation of identities and discourses of the Habsburg periphery during the occupation and subsequent annexation of Bosnia and Herzegovina. If the classical " empire studies " derive from the binary matrix of the relationship between the metropolis (Vienna) and the periphery (Bosnia and Herzegovina), the author tries to add another element, namely "Slovenian lands", which otherwise belong to the category of periphery. The research question focuses on how the inhabitants of this periphery saw and understood themselves when they came in contact with the new "colony" and, of course, how they perceived and described the people and the situation they found in the new "Bosnian periphery". The focus is therefore on forms of giving sense and attributing meaning. Based on various sources, with the help of a cultural-historical approach, understood primarily as a specific perspective on various subjects of study, the author tries to understand what kind of discourse (hegemonic, imperial, colonial, Yugoslav, Austrian…) developed between 1878 and 1918 and what kind of subjectivization he led to. The thesis shows that the South Slavic or. Slovene culture was not only a silent object of (German) hegemonic discourse, it was not only a collaborator of the Viennese center, but it was itself an active and self-initiated speaking subject. The core of the research represent resources from "below", this means that the object of interest are common people (individual soldiers, professors, writers) and their concrete, particular and always partial experience.
author2 Stergar, Rok
format Master Thesis
author Krivec, Jaroš
author_facet Krivec, Jaroš
author_sort Krivec, Jaroš
title Pogled na drugega: podobe Bosne in Hercegovine in njenih prebivalcev med 1878 in 1918
title_short Pogled na drugega: podobe Bosne in Hercegovine in njenih prebivalcev med 1878 in 1918
title_full Pogled na drugega: podobe Bosne in Hercegovine in njenih prebivalcev med 1878 in 1918
title_fullStr Pogled na drugega: podobe Bosne in Hercegovine in njenih prebivalcev med 1878 in 1918
title_full_unstemmed Pogled na drugega: podobe Bosne in Hercegovine in njenih prebivalcev med 1878 in 1918
title_sort pogled na drugega: podobe bosne in hercegovine in njenih prebivalcev med 1878 in 1918
publisher J. Krivec
publishDate 2021
url https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/IzpisGradiva.php?id=130273
https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/Dokument.php?id=147341&dn=
https://plus.si.cobiss.net/opac7/bib/77937667?lang=sl
genre sami
sami
genre_facet sami
sami
op_source Ljubljana
op_relation https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/IzpisGradiva.php?id=130273
https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/Dokument.php?id=147341&dn=
https://plus.si.cobiss.net/opac7/bib/77937667?lang=sl
op_rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
_version_ 1766186806566453248
spelling ftuniljubljanair:oai:repozitorij.uni-lj.si:IzpisGradiva.php-id-130273 2023-05-15T18:14:06+02:00 Pogled na drugega: podobe Bosne in Hercegovine in njenih prebivalcev med 1878 in 1918 The View on the Other: images of Bosnia and Herzegovina and its inhabitants between 1878 and 1918 Krivec, Jaroš Stergar, Rok 2021-09-12 application/pdf https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/IzpisGradiva.php?id=130273 https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/Dokument.php?id=147341&dn= https://plus.si.cobiss.net/opac7/bib/77937667?lang=sl slv slv J. Krivec https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/IzpisGradiva.php?id=130273 https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/Dokument.php?id=147341&dn= https://plus.si.cobiss.net/opac7/bib/77937667?lang=sl info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Ljubljana identitete kulturna zgodovina Habsburška monarhija Bosna in Hercegovina 19. stoletje identities cultural history Habsburg Monarchy Bosnia and Herzegovina 19th century info:eu-repo/classification/udc/94(497.15)"1878/1918" info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion 2021 ftuniljubljanair 2021-12-06T10:24:44Z Magistrsko delo skuša osvetliti vprašanje o oblikovanju identitet in diskurzov habsburške periferije v času okupacije in kasnejše aneksije Bosne in Hercegovine. Če klasične »študije imperijev« izhajajo iz binarne matrice razmerja metropola (Dunaj) – periferija (Bosna in Hercegovina), avtor poskuša dodati še en člen, namreč »slovenske dežele«, ki sicer spadajo v kategorijo periferije. Raziskovalno vprašanje se osredotoča na to, kako so se prebivalci te periferije ob stiku z novo »kolonijo« sami videli in razumeli ter, seveda, kako so dojemali in opisovali ljudi in situacijo, ki so jo našli v novi »bosanski periferiji«. Fokus je torej na oblikah osmišljanja in pripisovanju pomena. Na podlagi različnih virov s pomočjo kulturnozgodovinskega pristopa, razumljenega predvsem kot specifično perspektivo na različne predmete preučevanja, avtor poskuša razbrati, kakšen diskurz (hegemonialen, imperialen, kolonialen, jugoslovanski, avstrijski …) se je razvil med letoma 1878 in 1918 in h kakšni vrsti subjektivizacije je vodil. Naloga pokaže da južnoslovanska oz. slovenska kultura ni bila samo nem objekt (nemškega) hegemonialnega diskurza, ni bila samo kolaborant dunajskega centra, ampak je bila sama aktiven in samoiniciativen govoreč subjekt. Osrednje mesto raziskave predstavljajo viri od »spodaj«, to pomeni, da so predmet zanimanja posamezni »mali« akterji (posamezni vojaki, profesorji, pisatelji) in njihova konkretna, partikularna in vedno parcialna izkušnja. Undergraduate thesis attempts to illuminate the questions on the formation of identities and discourses of the Habsburg periphery during the occupation and subsequent annexation of Bosnia and Herzegovina. If the classical " empire studies " derive from the binary matrix of the relationship between the metropolis (Vienna) and the periphery (Bosnia and Herzegovina), the author tries to add another element, namely "Slovenian lands", which otherwise belong to the category of periphery. The research question focuses on how the inhabitants of this periphery saw and understood themselves when they came in contact with the new "colony" and, of course, how they perceived and described the people and the situation they found in the new "Bosnian periphery". The focus is therefore on forms of giving sense and attributing meaning. Based on various sources, with the help of a cultural-historical approach, understood primarily as a specific perspective on various subjects of study, the author tries to understand what kind of discourse (hegemonic, imperial, colonial, Yugoslav, Austrian…) developed between 1878 and 1918 and what kind of subjectivization he led to. The thesis shows that the South Slavic or. Slovene culture was not only a silent object of (German) hegemonic discourse, it was not only a collaborator of the Viennese center, but it was itself an active and self-initiated speaking subject. The core of the research represent resources from "below", this means that the object of interest are common people (individual soldiers, professors, writers) and their concrete, particular and always partial experience. Master Thesis sami sami Repository of the University of Ljubljana (RUL)